Unity and Sectionalism (1)
Download
Report
Transcript Unity and Sectionalism (1)
Growth and Expansion:
UNITY AND SECTIONALISM
The Era of Good Feelings
The absence of major political
divisions after the War of 1812
helped forge a sense of national
unity which a Boston newspaper
called “The Era of Good Feelings.”
In the 1816 presidential election,
James Monroe, the Republican
candidate, faced almost no
opposition.
Monroe spent much of his first term
touring the country and greeting
citizens.
He paid his own expenses and tried
to travel without an official escort.
In 1820 President Monroe won
reelection, winning all but one
electoral vote.
Sectionalism Grows
The Era of Good Feelings did not
last long as regional differences
soon came to the surface.
Most Americans felt a strong
allegiance to the region where they
lived such as the North, South, or
West.
This sectionalism became more
intense as differences arose over
national policies.
The conflict over slavery became
particularly heated as Southerners
supported it and Northerners
opposed it.
Southern whites claimed that any
attempt by the federal government
to limit slavery was a infringement
on states’ rights.
Other Disagreements
The different regions also
disagreed on the need for
tariffs, a national bank, and
internal improvements.
Internal improvements
were federal, state, and
privately funded projects
such as canal and roads, to
develop the nation’s
transportation system.
3 powerful voices emerged
in Congress in the early
1800s as spokespersons for
their regions.
3 Powerful Voices
John C. Calhoun: planter from
South Carolina who supported
state sovereignty, the idea that
states have autonomous power.
Argued that tariffs raised prices
on manufactured goods that
people needed.
Daniel Webster: Representative
of New Hampshire and then
Massachusetts who favored the
Tariff of 1816 which protected
American industries from
foreign competition.
Henry Clay: Speaker of the
House, from Kentucky, who
represented the Western states.
Believed in compromise.
The Missouri Compromise
Sectional tension reached new
heights in 1820 over the issue of
admitting new states.
The South wanted Missouri
admitted as a slave state, but the
North wanted it free.
While the debate was still going on,
Maine also applied for statehood.
Eventually Henry Clay helped
negotiate the Missouri Compromise
which admitted Missouri as a slave
state and Maine as a free state.
It also banned slavery in any new
territories north of the 36 30 N
parallel.
The American System
In addition to the Missouri Compromise,
Henry Clay also came up with a plan
called “The American System.”
This included a protective tariff, a
program of internal improvements to
stimulate trade, and a national bank to
control inflation and lend money to
developing industries.
He believed that the tariff would provide
money to build roads and canals which
would help businesses.
Many Southerners, including Thomas
Jefferson, believed that the plan would
only benefit the wealthy manufacturing
classes of New England.
In the end, very few of Clay’s suggestions
were put into practice.
McCulloch v. Maryland
The Supreme Court also became
involved in the issue of states’
rights.
Maryland had imposed a tax on the
Baltimore branch of the Second
Bank of the United States, a federal
institution.
The Bank refused to pay, and took
Maryland to court.
Speaking for the Court, Chief Justice
John Marshall ruled that Maryland
had no right to tax a federal
institution.
The Constitution and the federal
government received their authority
directly from the people, not by way
of the state governments.
Relations With Britain
In the years following the War of
1812, President Monroe and his
secretary of state, John Quincy
Adams, moved to resolve longstanding disputes with Great
Britain.
In 1817, the Rush-Bagot Treaty
provided for disarmament, the
removal of weapons, by setting
limits on the number of naval
vessels each could have on the
Great Lakes.
The Convention of 1818 set the
boundary between the U.S. and
British Canada at the 49th
parallel and demilitarized the
border.
Relations With Spain
Spain owned East Florida and also
claimed West Florida, but the United
States contended that West Florida was
part of the Louisiana Purchase.
In 1810 and 1812, Americans simply
added parts of West Florida to Louisiana
and Mississippi, and although Spain
objected, it took no action.
In April 1818, General Andrew Jackson
invaded Spanish East Florida, seizing
control of 2 Spanish forts.
Although he had been ordered to stop
Seminole raids on American territory,
capturing Spanish forts were not part of
his instructions.
Secretary of War Calhoun said Jackson
should be court-martialed.
Adams-Onis Treaty
Secretary of State John Quincy
Adams, on the other hand, saw
what Jackson had done as a means
to an end.
Already troubled by rebellions in
Mexico and South America, Spain
signed the Adams-Onis Treaty in
1819 which gave both East and West
Florida to the United States.
In return the United States gave up
its claims to Spanish Texas and took
over responsibility for paying the $5
million that American citizens
claimed Spain owed them for
damages.
The U.S. also gained a large piece of
territory in the Northwest making
America a transcontinental power.
Spain Loses Its Empire
In the fall of 1810 a priest, Miguel
Hidalgo, led a rebellion against the
Spanish government in Mexico.
Although Hidalgo was defeated and
executed, Mexico did eventually
gain its independence in 1821.
Simon Bolivar, also known as “the
Liberator,” led the movement that
won freedom for present-day
Venezuela, Colombia, Panama,
Bolivia, and Ecuador.
Jose de San Martin successfully
achieved independence for Chile
and Peru.
By 1824, Spain’s once great empire
in the Americas had shrunk to Cuba,
Puerto Rico, and a few other islands
in the Caribbean.
The Monroe Doctrine
In 1822 Spain had asked France,
Austria, Russia, and Prussia to help
in its fight against revolutionary
forces in South America.
The possibility of increased
European involvement in the
Americas led President Monroe to
take action.
The president issued a statement,
later known as the Monroe
Doctrine, that while the United
States would not interfere with any
existing European colonies in the
Americas, North and South America
“are henceforth not to be
considered as subjects for future
colonization by any European
powers.”