Transcript Document

Circuit Families
Adopted from David Harris of Harvey Mudd College
Outline
 Pseudo-nMOS Logic
 Dynamic Logic
 Pass Transistor Logic
2
Introduction
 What makes a circuit fast?
– I = C dV/dt -> tpd  (C/I) DV
– low capacitance
– high current
4
B
– small swing
4
A
 Logical effort is proportional to C/I
1
1
 pMOS are the enemy!
– High capacitance for a given current
 Can we take the pMOS capacitance off the input?
 Various circuit families try to do this…
Y
3
Pseudo-nMOS
 In the old days, nMOS processes had no pMOS
– Instead, use pull-up transistor that is always ON
 In CMOS, use a pMOS that is always ON
– Ratio issue
– Make pMOS about ¼ effective strength of
pulldown network
1.8
1.5
load
P/2
1.2
P = 24
Ids
Vout 0.9
Vout
16/2
Vin
0.6
P = 14
0.3
P=4
0
0
0.3
0.6
0.9
1.2
1.5
1.8
Vin
4
Pseudo-nMOS Gates
 Design for unit current on output
to compare with unit inverter.
 pMOS fights nMOS
Y
inputs
f
Inverter
Y
A
NAND2
gu
gd
gavg
pu
pd
pavg
=
=
=
=
=
=
A
B
gu
g
Y gd
avg
pu
pd
pavg
NOR2
=
=
=
=
=
=
A
B
gu
gd
gavg
Y pu
pd
pavg
=
=
=
=
=
=
5
Pseudo-nMOS Gates
 Design for unit current on output
to compare with unit inverter.
 pMOS fights nMOS
Y
inputs
f
Inverter
2/3
Y
A
4/3
NAND2
gu
gd
gavg
pu
pd
pavg
=
=
=
=
=
=
gu
g
Y gd
avg
8/3
pu
pd
8/3
pavg
2/3
A
B
NOR2
=
=
=
=
=
=
2/3
A
4/3 B
gu
gd
gavg
Y pu
4/3 pd
pavg
=
=
=
=
=
=
6
Pseudo-nMOS Gates
 Design for unit current on output
to compare with unit inverter.
 pMOS fights nMOS
Y
inputs
f
Inverter
2/3
Y
A
4/3
NAND2
gu
gd
gavg
pu
pd
pavg
= 4/3
= 4/9
= 8/9
=
=
=
A
B
gu
2/3
g
Y gd
avg
8/3
pu
pd
8/3
pavg
NOR2
= 8/3
= 8/9
= 16/9
=
=
=
2/3
A
4/3 B
gu
gd
gavg
Y pu
4/3 pd
pavg
= 4/3
= 4/9
= 8/9
=
=
=
7
Pseudo-nMOS Gates
 Design for unit current on output
to compare with unit inverter.
 pMOS fights nMOS
Y
inputs
f
Inverter
2/3
Y
A
4/3
NAND2
gu
gd
gavg
pu
pd
pavg
= 4/3
= 4/9
= 8/9
= 6/3
= 6/9
= 12/9
gu
g
Y gd
avg
8/3
pu
pd
8/3
pavg
2/3
A
B
NOR2
= 8/3
= 8/9
= 16/9
= 10/3
= 10/9
= 20/9
2/3
A
4/3 B
gu
gd
gavg
Y pu
4/3 pd
pavg
= 4/3
= 4/9
= 8/9
= 10/3
= 10/9
= 20/9
8
Pseudo-nMOS Power
 Pseudo-nMOS draws power whenever Y = 0
– Called static power P = I•VDD
– A few mA / gate * 1M gates would be a problem
– This is why nMOS went extinct!
 Use pseudo-nMOS sparingly for wide NORs
 Turn off pMOS when not in use
en
Y
A
B
C
9
Dynamic Logic
 Dynamic gates uses a clocked pMOS pullup
 Two modes: precharge and evaluate
2
A

2/3
Y
1
Y
1
A
Static
4/3
Pseudo-nMOS

Precharge
Y
A
1
Dynamic
Evaluate
Precharge
Y
10
The Foot
 What if pulldown network is ON during precharge?
 Use series evaluation transistor to prevent fight.
precharge transistor

Y


Y
inputs
A
Y
inputs
f
f
foot
footed
unfooted
11
Logical Effort
Inverter

unfooted
NAND2
1
gd
pd
footed
2
2
2
B
2
gd
pd
=
=

1
1
B
Y
gd
pd
=
=
A
1
gd
pd
=
=
1
Y
1
Y
A
A
=
=


1
Y
1
Y
A

NOR2
A
3
B
3
3

1
Y
gd
pd
=
=
A
2
B
2
2
gd
pd
=
=
12
Logical Effort
Inverter

unfooted
NAND2
1
gd
pd
footed
2
2
2
B
2
gd
pd
= 2/3
= 3/3

1
1
B
Y
gd
pd
= 2/3
= 3/3
A
1
gd
pd
= 1/3
= 3/3
1
Y
1
Y
A
A
= 1/3
= 2/3


1
Y
1
Y
A

NOR2
A
3
B
3
3

1
Y
gd
pd
= 3/3
= 4/3
A
2
B
2
2
gd
pd
= 2/3
= 5/3
13
Monotonicity
 Dynamic gates require monotonically rising inputs
during evaluation

– 0 -> 0
A
– 0 -> 1
– 1 -> 1
violates monotonicity
– But not 1 -> 0
during evaluation
A

Precharge
Evaluate
Precharge
Y
Output should rise but does not
14
Monotonicity Woes
 But dynamic gates produce monotonically falling
outputs during evaluation
 Illegal for one dynamic gate to drive another!
A=1

A
Y

Precharge
Evaluate
Precharge
X
X
Y
15
Monotonicity Woes
 But dynamic gates produce monotonically falling
outputs during evaluation
 Illegal for one dynamic gate to drive another!
A=1

A
Y

Precharge
Evaluate
Precharge
X
X
X monotonically falls during evaluation
Y
Y should rise but cannot
16
Domino Gates
 Follow dynamic stage with inverting static gate
– Dynamic / static pair is called domino gate
– Produces monotonic outputs

Precharge
Evaluate
Precharge
domino AND
W
W
X
Y
Z
X
A
B
C

Y
Z
dynamic static
NAND inverter

A
B


W
X
H
C
Y
H
Z
=
A
B

X
Z
C
17
Domino Optimizations
 Each domino gate triggers next one, like a string of
dominos toppling over
 Gates evaluate sequentially but precharge in parallel
 Thus evaluation is more critical than precharge
 HI-skewed static stages can perform logic

S0
S1
S2
S3
D0
D1
D2
D3
H
Y

S4
S5
S6
S7
D4
D5
D6
D7
18
Dual-Rail Domino
 Domino only performs noninverting functions:
– AND, OR but not NAND, NOR, or XOR
 Dual-rail domino solves this problem
– Takes true and complementary inputs
– Produces true and complementary outputs
sig_h
sig_l
Meaning
0
0
Precharged
0
1
‘0’
1
0
‘1’
1
1
invalid

Y_l
inputs
f
Y_h
f

19
Leakage
 Dynamic node floats high during evaluation
– Transistors are leaky (IOFF  0)
– Dynamic value will leak away over time
– Formerly miliseconds, now nanoseconds!
 Use keeper to hold dynamic node
– Must be weak enough not to fight evaluation
weak keeper

A
1 k
X
H
Y
2
2
20
Charge Sharing
 Dynamic gates suffer from charge sharing


A
Y
CY
x
A
Y
B=0
Cx
x
21
Charge Sharing
 Dynamic gates suffer from charge sharing


A
Y
CY
x
A
Y
B=0
Cx
Charge sharing noise
x
Vx  VY 
22
Charge Sharing
 Dynamic gates suffer from charge sharing


A
Y
CY
x
A
Y
B=0
Cx
Charge sharing noise
x
CY
Vx  VY 
VDD
Cx  CY
23
Secondary Precharge
 Solution: add secondary precharge transistors
– Typically need to precharge every other node
 Big load capacitance CY helps as well

Y
A
secondary
precharge
transistor
x
B
24
Noise Sensitivity
 Dynamic gates are very sensitive to noise
– Inputs: VIH  Vtn
– Outputs: floating output susceptible noise
 Noise sources
– Capacitive crosstalk
– Charge sharing
– Power supply noise
– Feedthrough noise
– And more!
25
Domino Summary
 Domino logic is attractive for high-speed circuits
– 1.5 – 2x faster than static CMOS
– But many challenges:
• Monotonicity
• Leakage
• Charge sharing
• Noise
 Widely used in high-performance microprocessors
26
Pass Transistor Circuits
 Use pass transistors like switches to do logic
 Inputs drive diffusion terminals as well as gates
 CMOS + Transmission Gates:
– 2-input multiplexer
– Gates should be restoring
S
S
A
A
S
S
Y
Y
B
B
S
S
27
LEAP
 LEAn integration with Pass transistors
 Get rid of pMOS transistors
– Use weak pMOS feedback to pull fully high
– Ratio constraint
S
A
S
L
Y
B
28
CPL
 Complementary Pass-transistor Logic
– Dual-rail form of pass transistor logic
– Avoids need for ratioed feedback
– Optional cross-coupling for rail-to-rail swing
S
A
S
L
Y
L
Y
B
S
A
S
B
29