Transcript Document

Feedback on the use of EST
in Finland
• In Finland the EST codes (user name &
password) given at the end of the 2 year
partnership
• For many users EST seems to be
relatated as one part of the final report,
not so much as a tool of dissemination
or gathering information
Information & Promotion
• Information events for the potential
applicants
• Every training organized for the
beneficiaries
Flyer, website, accompanying letter to
beneficiaries
General impressions /
beneficiary
• The user interface is simple to use, no
major technical problems
• More questions about the content:
– How many products should be shown?
– Is one joint product enough? What is a result?
– Why is the same information repeated many
times (common language & national
language)?
General impressions /
global users
• Very good that all the partnerships/
projects are found in one place
• Good possibility to find lots of
information on European cooperation
• Wide range of different possibilities to
get ideas for the new partnerships
/projects
Ideas for improvement
• Clearer instructions of the final
work/result?
• How to spread the star project
information to all partners?
• Search-function?
• Some links are not visual enough, the
user has to move the cursor a lot to find
the links