Transcript Slide 1
History of Medicine
Body health dependent on the
balance of 4 humours:
Blood, phlegm, bile, and black bile
Sweating, vomiting, urinating,
bleeding, oozing pus were ways to
restore balance
Treatment linked to this theory
Blood letting – cutting, cupping, leeches
Induce vomiting - Ipecac, calomel
Blistering – mustard pack to induce
infection
History of Medicine
News Flash 1799! George
Washington has a sore throat!
Blistered throat
Leeches behind ears and on throat
Enema
Emetic
More blood letting = 5 pints!
History of Medicine
News Flash 1881! President
Garfield Shot!
Drs probed wound with fingers
“Healthy pus” discharged – Whew!
We thought he might die…
Died of infection – strep bacteria
were introduced by probing of
doctors
History of Medicine
Rise of Thomsonians in early 1800s
Less violent treatment
Thought that disease was a result of cold
Herbs used to purge the body
Warm baths
Return medicine to laypeople
Others
Homeopaths: Let nature do it…diet,
exercise, hygiene
Hydrotherapy: Diet, bathing
These beat throwing up and enemas!
History of Medicine
Why were these therapies supported?
No cures!
Some benefits – diet, exercise,
cleanliness
Accidental successes – Many diseases
are self limiting – “post hoc ergo propter
hoc”
Popular press
Placebo effect
Reason was used instead of
experimentation
History of Medicine
New Advances…Europe 1800s
Microscope, stethoscope,
thermometers
Study of Bacteriology
Study of parasites
Epidemiology: Correlation of disease
and treatments - found bleeding to
be ineffective – Whew!
History of Medicine
James Lind - 1747
In a controlled experiment, gave
oranges/lemons to British sailors and
they didn’t develop scurvy
Joseph Lister – 1850s and 1860s
Aseptic surgery
Antiseptic carbolic acid
4% mortality rate
Paradigm shift:
Development of microscope
Humours to microorganisms
Claude Bernard:
“Why think?
Exhaustively experiment,
then think.”
History of Medicine
Advances in U.S.
Johns Hopkins dies and leaves 3.5
million to open a university/hospital
Quaker trustees of estate decided on
the German model
Research and experimentation
began with much success
Immunizations – Typhoid, cholera,
rabies
Research Culminated In…
First Cure 1891: Diphtheria
“El garrotillo”
Francisco de Goya
1746 - 1828
History of Medicine
Sometime in the early 1900s…
“a random patient, with a random
disease, consulting a doctor
chosen at random had, for the first
time in the history of mankind, a
better than fifty-fifty chance of
profiting from the encounter”
- Lawence Henderson, Harvard, 1964
Science Makes a Difference!
Ea 18
rly 00
19 s
00
s
19
40
s
N
ow
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
G
re
M ek
ed s
ie
va
l
# Years
Average Life Expectancy
Current Tx in Autism Field
Rapid prompting
Sensory integration
Facilitated communication
EDTA Chelation
Xango juice
Mega-Vitamins
GFCF diet
Auditory integration
Relationship development intervention
Psychomotor patterning
Sciopathy
Behavior Analysis*
Current Tx in Autism Field
Why are there so many?
No cure for autism
Accidental successes
Kids may improve for unknown reasons
Kids may improve due to concurrent Tx
Press and internet blogs
“(Child’s name) reasoning and behavior have changed for the
better since drinking this juice. “
Placebo effect?
Lack of appropriate experimentation –
sound familiar? Reason vs experiments
Current Tx in Autism Field
Why are they used? (cont’d)
Proponents tell us that Tx is
supported by “Research”
But sometimes studies don’t have
objective measurement
Some studies don’t establish
causality
Current Tx in Autism Field
Should I Try This One?
Is there scientific support?
Make evidence-based decisions
Are the studies that support it
correctly done?
Weigh risks/costs vs benefits
Short term vs long term
What about cost of not trying
alternatives
Beware of “Research Shows”
HRT (Hormone replacement therapy during
menopause)
1985: 122,000 nurses studied by Harvard
Medical School
HRT is effective at managing menopausal
symptoms
Also, concluded that nurses taking HRT during
menopause had 1/3 as many heart attacks
This result formed the basis of therapeutic wisdom
for the next 17 years
Beware of “Research Shows”
1998: Heart-Estrogen Replacement (HERS)
Clinical Trial– post-menopausal women
Concluded that estrogen increased frequency of
heart attacks in those women who had existing
heart disease.
2002: Women’s Health Initiative (WHI)
Clinical Trial – post-menopausal women
Concluded that HRT was a potential health risk for
all post-menopausal women including heart
disease, stroke, breast cancer. But may offer
protection from osteoporosis and maybe
colorectal cancer.
2011 – Effects of HRT less clear – short term
use maybe OK
Observational Study - Nurses
Collection of Subjects:
Some take Drug and
some do not
Prescriber Effect: Drug
may be prescribed to
healthier (or sicker) patients
Compliance Effect:
Those who follow Dr
orders are generally
healthier!
BIAS!!
Assignment
for Analysis
Drug
Healthy User Bias: Those
who take the drug do many
things right! (diet, exercise)
No Drug
Observational Studies
“They can distinguish associations
between events…But they cannot
inherently determine causation…”
-Gary Taubes, New York Times, Science Journalist
Controlled Experiment – HERS/WHI
Subjects
Random
Assignment
Drug
No Systematic Bias
Placebo