Transcript PowerPoint

Refugee Research
Institute
EU Refugee and Asylum Policy Proposal
Michael Apicelli, Leticia Cano, Paola Castellani, Jessica Hartman, Tanya Raymond
Current Policy Situation





Significant differences in refugee and asylum
policy between EU member states
Differing interpretations of the definition of
refugee status
Asymmetrical “burden sharing” among member
states
Current bureaucratic process is uneven,
extended, unfair and inefficient
Varying standards of rights and benefits for
refugees and asylum seekers
Policy Objectives




To establish greater unity in the area of
freedom, justice and security among EU
member states
To create a common policy on asylum that the
EU can implement
To guarantee expedient, fair, and humane
protection to refugees and asylum seekers with
an assurance of rights and benefits
An accelerated process of determining refugee
status
Creating a Common Policy



Considered existing
policy of member
states
Example member
states chosen to
represent diversity of
the EU
Size, economy,
geography, history,
and duration in the
EU taken into
consideration

Germany, Spain,
Czech Republic,
Greece, and Latvia
cases
Definitions


A refugee is a person who "owing to a wellfounded fear of being persecuted for reasons of
race, religion, nationality, membership of a
particular social group, or political opinion, is
outside the country of his nationality, and is
unable to or, owing to such fear, is unwilling to
avail himself of the protection of that country...”
Convention Refugee status: a status that is
granted to refugees within countries who abide
by the 1951 UN Convention on Refugees,
which prescribes certain minimum standards.
Centralized Policy




Asylum seeker may apply at any member
state’s police station, border crossing, or
consulate
Timeframe—must apply within 72 hours of
arrival
Convention Refugee applications shall be
submitted to the EU Committee for Refugee
and Asylum
EU decision to grant refugee status based on
1951 Convention guidelines
Decision Process



EU Committee for Refugee and Asylum will
consist of a panel of judges and immigration
officials
Committee members are appointed to
represent all member states
Quotas will be set for each country by the
Committee
Country Placement




When refugee applies for asylum, refugee is
granted a choice for country placement
Choice 1: refugee allows the EU to place her in
“the best suited place”—timeframe = 3 months
Choice 2: refugee lists top three country
choices—timeframe = 4-7 months
Placement is based on country quotas to
ensure equal responsibility between EU
member states
Asylum seeker
submits application
EU determines if applicant can
have Convention Status
Status Granted
Status not granted
EU Council on
Immigration &
Naturalization
EU Refugee
Council
Council Determines
Placement
Applicant Choice 1
Applicant Choice 2
Applicant Choice 3
Yes
No
Yes
Council Determines
Placement
No
Yes
No
Appeals

Any host state or asylum applicant in
disagreement with the EU decision may appeal
to the EU Court of Justice

Determination of appeals are to be decided
within 1 month
EU Refugee Applicant Fund



Financial assistance provided to member states
to support asylum seekers
Funding is pooled from member states
according to relative economic strength
Funding will be distributed to states according
to volume of refugee applicants received each
year
Initial Payment Allocation to EU Refugee Fund
Austria
Final Re-allocation of EU Refugee Fund
based on actual Refugee Distribution
Belgium
Belgium
2%
Cyprus
4%
10%
4%
1%
6%
Denmark
3%
5%
1%
Czech Republic
5%
Estonia
4%
5%
5%
1%
Cyprus
3%
5%
Germany
Greece
1%
Hungary
Czech Republic
Denmark
4%
0%
Finland
France
10%
1%
8%
3%
Italy
5%
5%
Netherlands
2%
9%
2%
1%
Poland
Ireland
8%
Italy
9%
3%
6%
3%
3%
Slovakia
Slovania
Latvia
Lithuania
Luxembourg
2%
1%
7%
11%
0%
Portugal
5%
France
Hungary
Luxembourg
Malta
1%
Finland
11% Greece
1%
Latvia
Lithuania
Estonia
Germany
1%
Ireland
4%
Austria
3%
1%
2% 3%
Malta
Netherlands
Poland
Portugal
Slovakia
Spain
Slovania
Sw eden
Spain
United Kingdom
Sw eden
United Kingdom
Figure A. represents the proportion of funds paid for by the State to the EU Refugee fund, which pays for refugee benefits while the application is being
processed. This proportion is based upon: total GDP, population size, and annual GDP growth.
Figure B. represents the proportion of funds from the EU Refugee fund that are re-distributed to the States based on the total number of asylum seekers
residing at in-country refugee centers, as the EU covers the cost of Convention Status refugees while their application is processed.
Guaranteed Rights and
Benefits


Asylum seekers accorded refugee status will be
guaranteed minimal standards of reception
encompassing housing, employment,
education, health care, and legal council
Minimal standards apply in all member states
Challenges

EU enlargement

Security—border
control, terrorism,
and human
trafficking

EU member states’
opposition to loss of
absolute sovereignty
Further Recommendations

Define criteria for
“safe countries”

Integration of
Migration and
Refugee Policies