Transcript Addendum A - NPTF Principles

NETWORK PLANNING TASK
FORCE
“SUMMER PLANNING SESSIONS”
8/01/05
1
Meeting Schedule – FY 2006
■ Summer Focus Groups (2)
■ July 18
■ August 01
■ Fall Meetings (6)
■ October 03 – Review Current Status/ Operational
Discussions/ Establishing the Fall priorities
■ October 17 – Strategic Security Discussions (Dave Millar)
■ October 31 – Strategic Security Discussions (Dave Millar)
■ November 07 – Strategic Discussions
■ November 21 – Strategic Discussions
■ December 5 – Consensus/Prioritization/Rate Setting
2
NPTF Fall ’05 Members
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
Mary Alice Annecharico / Rod MacNeil,
SOM
Robin Beck, ISC
Chris Bradie/Dave Carrol, Business
Services
Cathy DiBonaventura, School of Design
Geoff Filinuk, ISC
Bonnie Gibson, Office of Provost
John Keane/ Grover McKenzie , Library
John Irwin, GSE
Marilyn Jost, ISC
Deke Kassabian / Melissa Muth, ISC
Doug Berger/ Manuel Pena, Housing
and Conference Services
Mike Weaver, Budget Mgmt. Analysis
Dominic Pasqualino, OACP
James Kaylor, CCEB
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
Kayann McDonnell, Law
Donna Milici, Nursing
Dave Millar, ISC
Michael Palladino, ISC (Chair)
Dan Shapiro, Dental
Mary Spada, VPUL
Marilyn Spicer, College Houses
Steve Stines / Joseph Shannon, Div.
of Finance
Andrew Selden, PCBI
Ira Winston / Helen Anderson,
SEAS, SAS, School of Design
Mark Aseltine/ Mike Lazenka, ISC
Eric Snyder, Vet School
Brian Doherty/John Yates, SAS
Richard Cardona, Annenberg
Deirdre Woods/ Bob Zarazowski,
Wharton
3
FY ’06 NPTF Goals
■
■
■
■
■
■
Evaluate various CSF funding models.
Hold as many rates flat as possible for FY ’07.
Depending on outcome of 100Mbps pilots, lower rate in
January 2006.
Determine new strategic initiatives/directions.
Determine which services can be scaled back.
Deploy new wireless APs to include capitalization.
4
NPTF Principles



Many Penn investments and operations are dependent
upon the viability, accessibility and security of the
network. ISC maintains close alignment with University
academic, research and business strategies.
Customers and ISC work as partners when making
decisions, insuring flexibility to accommodate business
needs and changing technologies. Using a continuous
process improvement approach, we seek maximum costeffectiveness and a high degree of customer satisfaction.
Customers and ISC are proactive in identifying strategic
directions and emerging technologies and encourage the
retirement of obsolete services and systems to insure
that we remain competitive with our peers and industry.
5
NPTF Principles (Funding Model)
 The costs are visible for data, voice and video services
and their associated components, showing a 5-year view
of budgets and assumptions. Aggregate service rate
increases are targeted at 0-3% maximum yearly,
determined in conjunction with the NPTF.
 The funding model is rational from both a customer and
ISC perspective and is measurable in terms that are
meaningful to the customer.
 All operating expenses (business continuity, planning,
support, security) are included in the model.
 The model is demand-based.
 The model remains simple in order to minimize overhead
costs and to allow for easy budgeting and discussion.
6
Budget Assumptions for FY ‘07
■
■
■
Security concerns continue to be a high priority as
various intrusions, compromises,viruses, worms, etc.
have reduced Penn’s productivity levels. New monies
may be requested for FY ’07.
5 year phase-out of allocated monies ($2.317M) to
occur from FY2003-07.
Telecommunications surplus, operating efficiencies
and increased costs to offset allocated cost phase out.
7
Budget Assumptions for FY ’07 (Continued)
■
■
■
Bandwidth management techniques combined with a
good Internet strategy have eased the pressure on
developing tiered network connectivity options based on
usage. However, this will continue to be explored and
evaluated as the need arises.
Separate SLAs for College Houses and Greeknet for
maintenance and bandwidth exist.
The FY2006 budget assumed Next Generation PennNet
project funding at $590k/year. Funding source is
Telecommunications surplus. TBD for FY ’07 – ‘10
8
Budget Assumptions for FY ’07 (Continued)
■
■
■
■
■
No rate increases for existing Telecommunications services
in FY ’07. Some Video service rate increase in ’07.
www.net.isc.upenn.edu/rates
For FY ‘06 College House students will continue to be billed
indirectly as part of housing fees for baseline PennNet and
Penn Video Network services. TBD for FY ’07
Building entrance and router equipment are on a four-year
replacement cycle.
Closet electronics and network servers are on a three-year
replacement cycle.
Penn will continue to operate MAGPI, the Internet2
gigaPop with primary purpose to help lower Penn’s Internet
costs and position for Penn’s likely need in the future for
the National Lambda Rail (Internet3?). Preliminary NLR
rates will be presented to NPTF this Fall.
9
Budget Assumptions for FY ’07 (Continued)
■
■
■
■
■
The growth rate in IP addresses from the
schools/centers is projected to increase by 1000 per
year from FY ’05-’09. TBD for FY ’06 –’10.
ISC managed wallplates projected to increase by 1000
new per year from FY ’06-’10
The CSF subsidized approximately 900 wired, public lab
connections that have computers attached in FY ’06.
TBD for FY ‘07
The CSF subsidized approximately 900 wireless public
IP connections in FY’06. TBD for FY ‘07
The NPTF decided to do school-based IP wireless
subsidies for FY ’06. TBD for FY ‘07
10
Budget Assumptions for FY ’07 (Continued)
■ To retain and recruit appropriate N&T IT staff, 3%
compensation has been budgeted from FY ‘06 –‘10.
■ In FY2006 a 51.8% overhead rate was projected to
cover costs of benefits, rent, training, computers,
telephones, etc. TBD for FY ’07.
■ The NOC will not be physically staffed (7x24x365)
through FY ‘10. It will continue to operate from 6 AM –
11 PM, M-F with the rest of the week covered by
technical staff on beepers.
■ N&T total expense budget increases from $22.0M in FY
’02 to only $23.7M in FY ’10. (< 1%/year)
11
Potential FY ’06 NPTF Topics






Additional LSP troubleshooting skills/tools
More comprehensive Remedy reports with topdown (building/school) view.
Closer look at Microsoft Exchange
Improved communication on security incidents
Security should be more proactive
Network repairs take too long for nonstandard connections (T1s).
12
Potential FY ’06 NPTF Topics

Campus-wide intrusion-detection system
 Is Arbor a possibility?
 Should we focus on more prevention rather than more
detection?

Authorization
 Especially for wireless PennNet
 Scan, certify and block capability
 Expanded directory services
 (Alumni, student groups, etc.)



Distribute tools such as PUMA to interested
schools/centers LSPs.
Student/staff discounted music contract
Campus Windows domain
13
Potential FY ’06 NPTF Topics



Disaster recovery
Data management/backup/archiving
Wireless
 Authorization
 N&T capitalization of APs
 Increased speed of 802.11 (54Mbps)

Campus edge firewall
 Block NetBIOS
 VPN Service (centralized or local?)

Expanded PennCommunity/Online Directory
Service
14
CUSTOMER FEEDBACK/
DISCUSSIONS
15