Transcript October In

October In-Service
MAP Information
October 22, 2004
MAP Testing Schedule
Spring 2005




Communication Arts - 3, 7, 11
Mathematics - 4, 8, 10
Science - 3, 7, 10 (voluntary – ???)
Social Studies - 4, 8, 11 (voluntary – ???)
MAP Testing Schedule
Spring 2006 and 2007
 Communication Arts 3 - 8, 11
• 3, 7, 11 – same type of tests (MC, CR, PE) but shorter
• 4, 5, 6, 8 – MC, CR only
 Mathematics 3 - 8, 10
• 4, 8, 10 – same type of tests (MC, CR, PE) but shorter
• 3, 5, 6, 7 – MC, CR only
 Science – 3, 7, 10 (voluntary – ???)
 Social Studies - 4, 8, 11 (voluntary – ???)
MAP Testing Schedule
Spring 2008
 Communication Arts 3 - 8, 11
 Mathematics 3 - 8, 10
 Science - grade span (EL{5}, MS{8}, HS{11})
 {recommended grade levels – not definite}
 Social Studies - 4, 8, 11 (voluntary – ???)
CURRICULUM REVISION SCHEDULE
Summersville R-II
2004-2009
2004-2005
Science
2005-2006
Social Studies
Fine Arts
Guidance
Gifted
Vocational
Health/PE
2006-2007
Communication
Arts
Technology
2007-2008
Math
2008-2009
Science
Foreign
Language
Media/Library
Fine Arts
Gifted
Vocational
Curriculum adjustments will be made as needed based on performance data. Major
curriculum revisions will be made during the scheduled year unless performance data
indicates major changes are needed or curricular changes occur at the State level.
Content Standards Report
Years 2000 – 2004
Grade Level
Content Area
Looking for Trends
Content Standards Report
Communication Arts
Communication Arts 03
Communication Arts 07
Communication Arts 11
Content Standards Report
Math
Mathematics 04
Mathematics 08
Mathematics 10
Content Standards Report
Science
Science 03
Science 07
Science 10
Content Standards Report
Social Studies
Social Studies 04
Social Studies 08
Social Studies 11
Content Standards Report
Content Standards Item
Analysis
Greater than 90%
Grade Level / Content
Area
Communication Arts
Mathematics
Science
Social Studies
GROUPS
Communication Arts
Sherry Tune (both)
Vicki Stoops (both)
Carol Hawkins (both)
Brenda Atchison (both)
Pam Nicholson (both)
Science
Julie Craig
Dena Keeling
Bob Irvin
Bill Holden
Junior King
Karen Terrill Laura Olson
Sue Keeling
Joni Appleton
Barb Jester
Sandy Smith
Chuck Conine Linda Barnett
Angela McCully Vicki Grogan
Lisa Vaughan
Johnny Collins
Jackie Cooper
GROUPS
Mathematics
Social Studies
Brenda Allen (both)
Danny Smith
Mindy Spurgin (both)
Clark Howell
Sondra Howell (both)
Lisa Haynes
Lisa Howell (both)
Beth Williamson
Sharon Davis (both)
Karen Wright
John Daniels
Bill Wells
Joni Irvin
Brenda Smith
Sue Conine
Nancy Tippin
Debbie Tune Jeannine Ross
Karen Hampton Brad Shockley
Identify Areas of Concern
“LIGHT IS A
NATURAL
DISINFECTANT”
Content & Goal Process Standards
Item Analysis
Less than 50%
Grade Level / Content
Area
Communication Arts
Mathematics
Science
Social Studies
What to Look For
Reoccurring Item Benchmarks on Content
Standards (pick three)
Question Types
Goal Process Standards that relate to Item
Benchmarks
Fill out Concepts & Applications Causing Low
Achievement Scores (for three indicated above)
IT’S TIME FOR A BREAK!!!!
October In-Service
Grade-Level Expectations
October 22, 2004
Grade-Level Expectations
Communication Arts – FINAL (updated 10-18)
Organized according to Strand (reading, writing,
listening, etc.); Big Idea (e.g., 1. Develop and
apply skills and strategies to the reading
process); and Concept (e.g., A. Print Concepts).
Each GLE is aligned to the Show-Me Standards
(content and process) and to benchmarks from
the Frameworks for Curriculum Development.
Glossary:
http://www.dese.state.mo.us/divimprove/curric
ulum/commarts/GlossaryUpdateCBarr.pdf
Grade-Level Expectations
Mathematics – FINAL (Mar ’04)
Organized according to Strand (Number and
Operations, etc.); Big Idea (e.g., 1. Understand
numbers, ways of representing numbers,…); and
Concept (e.g., A. Read, Write, and Compare
Numbers).
Each GLE is aligned to the Show-Me Standards
(content and process) and to benchmarks from
the Frameworks for Curriculum Development.
Grade-Level Expectations
Science – NOT FINAL (mid-Dec)
Organized according to Standard (1. Properties
and Principles of Matter and Energy); Big Idea
(e.g., 1. Changes in Properties and states of
matter…); and Concept (e.g., A. Objects, and
the materials they are made of, have
properties…).
Each GLE will be aligned to the Show-Me
Standards (content and process) and to
benchmarks from the Frameworks for
Curriculum Development.
Grade-Level Expectations
Social Studies – FINAL (updated 10-20)
Organized according to Standards and GradeLevels ( Grades K-4 – 1. Principals of
Constitutional Democracy); Benchmark
objectives for each standard are listed on the far
left side and indicate how they might reasonably
be placed in a K-12 curriculum.
Glossary:
http://www.dese.state.mo.us/divimprove/curric
ulum/GLE/ssglossary.pdf
Grade-Level Expectations
Correlation Study
Objectives Report
Review Objectives to
find how they correlate
with the Grade-Level
Expectations
ASK – Does this fit??
Grade-Level Expectations
Present Objective is Above and Beyond
 BLUE
Present Objective is Close
 YELLOW
Present Objective Does Not Match
 PINK
To Do List
Review areas of concern
Put copies in your lesson book (keep it visible!)
Revise curriculum throughout the school year
Curriculum should be a living, breathing
document
Be flexible
Change something – Cannot expect different
results unless you change something!!
Where do we go from here?