Transcript Presentation 6 Review of EU Cohesion Policy M Camhis - e

University of Thessaly
Department of Planning and Regional Development
Graduate Program in European Regional Development Studies
Fall Semester, 2012-13
Course:
The Geography of European Integration: Economy, Society and
Institutions
Lecturers: Petrakos G., Camhis M., Kotios A., Maraveyas N., Topaloglou L.,
Bogiazides N.
Lecture 6:
Review of EU Cohesion Policy
Marios Camhis
University of Thessaly
Department of Planning
and Regional Development
Lecture 27 November 2012
Review of EU Cohesion policy
Marios Camhis PhD
3
4
What is the EU
 A unique construction, under continuous development
and step by step change
 MSs differences: economic development, history,
administration, size and population, 23 languages
 Complex geography: islands, mountain ranges, deep
bays, rivers and plains
 Two methods of functioning: Community and
Intergovernmental
 Policies: differences in competence, budget, legal base
 No final vision/plan
 The more EU you have the more you need
5
Undergoes continuous transformation
Successive enlargements: increase in area and population
+1.1.2013 Croatia
6
Changing borders
7
Categories of Union competence
 1. Exclusive competence: only the Union may legislate and adopt
legally binding acts.
 2. Shared competence: EU and MSs may legislate in that area, but
the MSs shall exercise their competence to the extent that the EU has
not exercised its competence
 3. MSs coordinate their economic and employment policies within
arrangements as determined by this Treaty
 4. Competence to carry out actions to support, coordinate or
supplement the actions of the MSs, without superseding MSs’
competence. Legally binding acts of the Union relating to these areas
shall not entail harmonisation of MSs' laws
 5. The Union shall have competence, (Treaty on European Union), to
define and implement a common foreign and security policy,
including the progressive framing of a common defence policy.
8
EU Budget 2012
9
Συνοχή-Περιφερειακή πολιτική
10
History of EU’s Regional Policy
1957: only preamble of the
Treaty of Rome mentions the need
to reduce the differences between
region
Prevalent ideology: market forces
will take care of regional inequalities
Regions in which firms benefit from
regional aids of national policies EEC 1964
1972: enlargement changes
character of EC:
Ireland, Greenland UK regions
in industrial decline+ Northern
Ireland.
1975: ERDF to support the regional
policies of MSs co-financing of
projects with economic character
selected by the MSs
1985: revised ERDF regulation, but
overtaken by events
11
History of EU’s Regional Policy

1986: new dynamic of European integration SEA Single market: people,
goods, services and money move freely + social and economic cohesion +
environment

15.02.1987: Commission “Making a success of the Single Act: a new
frontier for Europe” COM (87) 100 final. – proposals for SFs

1986-1989 Integrated Mediterranean Programmes: Tackle development
problems and new ideas: integrated approach, planning/programming

December 1988, difficult negotiations, Council adopts multiannual
programme (1ο Delors package)

New regulations and doubling of the resources of the SFs (Regional,
Social and Agricultural Guidance) until 1993

Regional policy transformed from supporting national regional policies to a
European Regional Policy
12
1989-1993
 Integration of the structural
funds
 5 objectives (+New
Länder) – European criteria
12 Community initiatives innovative actions
Partnership
 New procedures
 Decentralized management
 Increase of the structural
funds' budget up to 14
billion ECU p.a. (ca. 20% of
EU-Budget)
13
Next reforms:
1994-1999, 2000-2006
 Adapting to new situations - improving procedures
 Consolidation of cohesion efforts
 Enlargements
 Rationalization of objectives and community initiatives
 Better management – increased controls
 Evaluation: ex ante, ex post
 Guidelines for preparation and implementation of programs
14
1994-1999
Treaty of EU (Maastricht):
Cohesion main objective as
Single market and EMU - TEN
Cohesion Fund and fisheries
instrument
New Regulations
New objective 6 (5+1)
13(16) initiatives
Simplification of procedures
Dec 1993: increase of the
structural funds' budget up to
32 billion ECU p.a. (ca. 30% of
EU budget) total 177 b.
15
2000- 30.4.2004
European Union :
Structural Funds 2000-2006 :
Areas eligible under Objectives 1 and 2
Canarias (E)
Guadeloupe Martinique
(F)
(F)
Réunion
(F)
Guyane (F)
Objective 1
Açores (P)
Objective 1
Phasing-out
(till 31/12/2005)
Phasing-out
(till 31/12/2006)
Special programme
Objective 2
Madeira
(P)
Objective 2
Objective 2 (partly)
Phasing-out
(till 31/12/2005)
Phasing-out (partly)
(till 31/12/2005)
Regional boundaries
NUTS2 boundaries
O3 (ex+4)
training and employment
0
SIG16
SIG16
100
500 km
© EuroGeographics Association for the administrative boundaries
7 initiatives , Pre-accession instruments (ISPA) + SAPARD + PHARE
16
2004-2006
Surface +34%, population +28%,
GDP +5%
Increase of inequalities: 1/3 pop
in MS with GDP < 90% of EU
Objective 1 population from
84 to 123 mil. (EU25)
From 40% to 49,9% of EU
population (155→224 Mio.) in
eligible areas
Phasing-out for some
objective 1,2 and 5b regions
Increase of the structural
funds' budget up to 38 b.
Euro p.a. (ca. 33% of EU
budget)
17
Evaluation of cohesion policy

Growth: increase in public and private investments

Convergence: increase of GDP in less developed regions

Employment: creation of new work places

Strengthening of integration: infrastructure, cross border cooperation

Contribution to Community priorities: environment, single market

Financial stability for 7 years

European model of life

Better regional and local governance - Link of EU with citizens
18
Evaluation of Regional policy
42,6 %
Greece
35,2 %
Portugal
Ireland
26,7 %
18,9 %
New German
Länder
17,4 %
Mezzogiorno
Spain
14,7 %
0
10
20
30
40
50
 Benefited MSs which contributed: % of European transfers
spend for imports from other Member States
19
Συνοχή 2007-2013
20
Cohesion policy 2007-2013
 From EU25 to EU 27
 Even greater inequalities
 Differences in administrative practices and experiences
of new MSs
 Great number of programmes/projects
 Difficulties of control
 Over ¼ of population lives in regions below 75% of EU
average GDP
 14 Member States have GDP below 90% of average
(34% of population)
21
Cohesion policy 2007-2013
3 objectives, no Community
initiatives, 3 Funds
< 75% ΕΕ27
< 75% EU15 + > EU27
> 75%
All regions eligible
Identification of territorial
zones
for “convergence”
Budget increase:
about Euro 50 bn p.a.
(ca. 36% of the EU budget)
Rural development and
fisheries funds
outside cohesion policy
22
Cohesion Policy 2007-2013
 81.54% for Convergence
 15.95% for Regional
Competitiveness and
Employment
 2.52% for European
Territorial Cooperation
Emphasize link with
Goteborg
and Lisbon agenda:
to make Europe
the most competitive
and dynamic economy
in the world: by 2010
employment rate of 70% R&D
3% of GDP…
23
Cohesion Policy 2007-2013
24
Concentration on the Lisbon agenda
1.
Making Europe and its regions a more attractive place to
invest and work: expand and improve transport infrastructures;
improve the environmental contribution to growth and jobs;
address the intensive use of traditional energy sources
2.
Knowledge and innovation for growth: increase and improve
investment in RTD; facilitate innovation and promote
entrepreneurship; promote the information society for all; improve
access to finance
3.
More and better jobs: attract and retain more people in
employment, modernise social protection systems; improve
adaptability of workers and enterprises and the flexibility of the
labour market; increase investment in human capital through
better education and skills; administrative capacity; health and the
labour force
25
Cohesion policy 2007-2013
 Convergence objective: 84 regions (in 17 MSs), pop.
154 m., GDP < 75 % EU average, EUR 199.3 b; 16
regions “phasing-out”, pop. 16.4 m., GDP slightly above
75 % due to statistical effect of larger EU, EUR 14 b.; EUR
69.5 b. for the Cohesion Fund (15 MSs).
 Regional Competitiveness and Employment objective:
strengthening competitiveness, support employment;
EU27-19 MSs 168 regions eligible, pop. 314 m. Within
these, 13 “phasing-in” regions (pop. 19 m.) with special
financial allocations former status “Objective 1”. EUR 55
billion – of which EUR 11.4 billion for the “phasing-in”
regions – about 16% of total allocation.
26
Cohesion policy 2007-2013
 European Territorial Co-operation objective (former Interreg)
EUR 8.7 billion (2.5 % of total):
 Cross-border co-operation Population in cross-border areas
181.7 million (37.5 % EU) EUR 6.44 billion
 Trans-national co-operation All EU regions covered by one of
the existing 13 transnational co-operation areas. EUR 1.83
billion
 Interregional co-operation and exchange of experience EUR
445 million
 European Grouping of Territorial Cooperation: legal basis to
implement joint programmes
 Former programmes Urban II and Equal integrated into
Convergence and Regional Competitiveness objectives.
27
Cohesion Fund
 Benefit from cohesion fund MSs with GNI (Gross National
Income) < 90% of the EU average.
 All the regions of: Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Estonia, Greece,
Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Malta, Poland, Portugal,
Romania, Slovenia, and Slovakia
 A phasing-out system for Spain (would have been eligible if
threshold at 90% of GNI average of the EU15 and not at EU25
 Cohesion Fund and ERDF in OPs for transport and
environmental projects
28
Cohesion policy 2007-2013
Γενικός Κανονισμός για
το ΕΤΠΑ, το ΕΚΤ και το Ταμείο
Συνοχής
 Κανονισμός ΕΤΠΑ
 Κανονισμός ΕΚΤ
 Κανονισμός Ταμείου Συνοχής
Ομοφωνία Συμβουλίου,
σύμφωνη γνώμη
Ευρωπαϊκού
Κοινοβουλίου
ΕΤΠΑ, ΕΚΤ:
συναπόφαση
Ταμείο Συνοχής:
διαβούλευση
 Κανονισμός για τη
σύσταση Ευρωπαϊκού Ομίλου
Εδαφικής Συνεργασίας (ΕΟΕΣ)
Ένας κανονισμός της Επιτροπής
Ενημέρωση, διαφήμιση,
δημοσιονομικός
έλεγχος και δημοσιονομικές
διορθώσεις
Νέο: ο Γενικός Κανονισμός ισχύει και για το Ταμείο Συνοχής· νέο Ταμείο Αγροτικής
Ανάπτυξης τώρα εκτός πολιτικής συνοχής· ένας κανονισμός της Επιτροπής αντί
για πέντε με ειδικές πτυχές· κανόνες επιλεξιμότητας που είναι απλοποιημένοι και
ενσωματωμένοι στο Γενικό Κανονισμό και τους κανονισμούς των Ταμείων.
29
Cohesion policy 2007-2013
 The Commission validates NSRF and each operational
programme (OP) regional or sectoral (by Fund).
 2007-2013: around 450 OPs adopted
 MSs and its regions implement the OPs, monitor and assess
 EC commits the expenditure to allow MS to start programs
 EC pays the certified expenditure per MS
 Commission + MS monitor each operational programme
 Joint management: MSs and Commission share the responsibility
of control of the budget
30
Cohesion policy 2007-2013
 For each OP the MS appoints:

a managing authority (a national, regional or local public
authority or public/private body to manage the operational
programme);

a certification body (a national, regional or local public
authority or body to certify the statement of expenditure
and the payment applications before their transmission to
the Commission); Πιστοποίηση

an auditing body (a national, regional or local public
authority or body for each operational programme to
oversee the efficient running of the management and
monitoring system). ΕΔΕΛ
31
Cohesion policy 2007-2013
 Maximum rate of co-financing for each objective:




Convergence: between 75% and 85% (for outmost regions
and Greek islands) – 95%
Competitiveness and Employment: between 50% and 55%
European Territorial Cooperation: between 75% and 85%
(for interregional cooperation)
Cohesion Fund: 85%
 Rewarding quality: reserve 3% (Council will decide in 2011)
 Flexibility: national reserve for unexpected economic and social
situations (1% in convergence, 3% in competitiveness)
32
Financial engineering
 Several new tools and initiatives to enable the most efficient use of
Structural and Cohesion Funds in the 2007-13 period. Financial
engineering instruments, ensuring that the investments maintain
their impact mainly with the European Investment Bank
 JEREMIE (Joint European Resources for Micro to Medium
Enterprises). Products include equity, venture capital, guarantees,
loans and technical assistance which will allow a multiplier effect of
the EU funds by using revolving financial products instead of grants.
 JESSICA (Joint European Support for Sustainable Investment in City
Areas) Initiative of the EC in cooperation with the EIB and the CEB to
promote sustainable investment in urban projects and programmes.
Resources from OPs to be invested under JESSICA can be
transferred to urban development funds, and co-financing can come
from municipalities, banks, pension funds or investment funds.
33
Cohesion policy 2007-2013:
important themes











Business support
Culture
Employment and education
Energy.
Environment
Health:
Information and communication technologies
Tourism
R&D and Innovation:
Transport:
Urban development
34
National Strategic Rural Development
Plan 2007-2013
 Determines priorities on the support of rural development in
accordance with Regulation on European Agricultural Fund for
Rural Development (EAFRD)
 Rural development policy for Greece focuses on three basic axes:
 Improving competitiveness in agricultural and forestry sectors.
 Enhancing the environment and the countryside
 Ameliorating quality of life in rural areas and differentiation of the
rural economy.
 It will be assisted by LEADER, a fourth horizontal axis, which is
based on the experience gained from the Leader Community
Initiatives of past programming periods.
35
National Strategic Plan for Fisheries
Development
 Covers fishery sector, in accordance with the Regulation regarding
the European Fisheries Fund (EFF)
 Determines priorities, objectives and resources:
 Sustainable development of fishing activities and areas;
aquaculture; processing and trade of fishery products; inland
waters fishery;
 Improvement of competitiveness
 Maintaining human resources and ensuring viable employment
 Protection and improvement of the marine environment
 Inspection and control requirements of fishing activities
 Collection of data and information on common fishery policy
36
Cohesion
policy
2007-2013
Greece
Περιφέρειες σύγκλισης
Περιφέρειες σταδιακής εξόδου
Περιφέρειες σταδιακής εισόδου
Περιφέρειες ανταγωνιστικότητας
και απασχόλησης
37
Cohesion Policy 2007-2013 Greece
National Strategic Reference Framework
 Sectoral Operational Programmes:

Environment & Sustainable Development; Accessibility
Improvement; Competitiveness and Entrepreneurship;
Digital Convergence; Human Resources Development;
Education and Lifelong Learning; Public Administration
Reform; Technical Support for Implementation; National
Contingency Reserve
 Regional Programmes:

Macedonia – Thrace; Western Greece – Peloponnesus –
Ionian islands; Crete and Aegean islands; Thessaly Sterea – Epirus; Attica
 Cross border and transnational programs
38
ΕΣΠΑ










Απορρόφηση κοντά/πάνω μέσο κοινοτικό
Ανάγκη επιτάχυνσης
Καλλικράτης
Μεγάλα έργα/παραχωρήσεις
Απαλλοτριώσεις – δικαστικές αποφάσεις
Εκχωρήσεις
Κοιμώμενα/νεκρά έργα
Σχέδιο δράσης ΥΠΑΑΝ/ΜΟΔ
181 έργα προτεραιότητας (110 στα ΠΕΠ, 71 τομεακά)
Προβληματικά ΕΠ (Ψηφιακή σύγκλιση, Διοικητική
μεταρρύθμιση
39
40
UNFINISHED PROJECTS OF THE 2000-2006
PROGRAMMING PERIOD

The backlog from the previous programming period 2000-2006 amounted, in
October 2011, to 1200 projects with an EC financial contribution of 3.39
billion euros.

Group A: 444 unfinished projects of the 13 Operational Programs with
completion date 30/9/12. 384 projects with an EC financial contribution of
748.32 million euros were completed by 30.9.2012.
60 projects with an EC financial contribution of 65.04 million euros remained
uncompleted by September 2012.


Group B: 756 unfinished projects of the 14 Operational Programs completion
date the 31/3/13. 422 projects with a budget of 3.55 billion euros and EC
financial contribution of 2.02 billion euros have to be completed by March
2013. In particular:



348 projects with an EC financial contribution of 1.56 billion euros will close
on time.
53 projects with an EC financial contribution of 0.45 billion euros need a
short time extension in order to be completed.
21 projects with an EC financial contribution of 12 million euros seem to be
“hopeless”.
41
Η νέα περίοδος 2014-2020
42
Europe 2020 (March 2010)
 Smart growth means improving the EU's performance in:
education; research-innovation; digital society
 Sustainable growth means: competitive low-carbon
economy; protecting the environment; developing new
green technologies; introducing efficient smart electricity
grids; harnessing EU-scale networks to give businesses an
additional competitive advantage; helping consumers make
green choices.
 Inclusive growth means: raising Europe’s employment rate –
more and better jobs; investment in skills & training;
modernising labour markets and welfare systems; ensuring
the benefits of growth reach all
43
Objectives
44
Reinforcing effectiveness and
performance
45
Στρατηγική προσέγγιση
 Κοινό Στρατηγικό Πλαίσιο (Κ.Σ.Π.): Θέτει τις βασικές δράσεις για την
επίτευξη των προτεραιοτήτων της Ε.Ε. «Mεταφράζει» τους σκοπούς
και στόχους της Στρατηγικής της Ε.Ε. για έξυπνη, βιώσιμη και χωρίς
αποκλεισμούς ανάπτυξη σε βασικές δράσεις για κάθε ένα από τα
Ταμεία (ΕΤΠΑ, ΕΚΤ, Ταμείο Συνοχής, ΕΓΤΑΑ και ΕΤΘΑ).
 Partnership agreement- Συμφωνία Εταιρικής Σχέσης: Το «πρώην
Ε.Σ.Π.Α.» αποτελεί μία «σύμβαση» ανάμεσα στο Κ-Μ και την ΕΕ
σχετικά με την χρήση των πόρων. Αξιολογείται υπό το πρίσμα της
υλοποίησης της «Ευρώπη 2020». Η αποτυχία στην επίτευξη στόχων
μπορεί να οδηγήσει σε αναστολή ή και ακύρωση της χρηματοδότησης.
Η χρηματοδότηση του Σ.Σ. καλύπτεται από όλα τα ταμεία.
 Επιχειρησιακό Πρόγραμμα (Ε.Π.): Το Ε.Π. θέτει τις προτεραιότητες
κάθε περιφέρειας ή τομέα. Τα Ε.Π. θα πρέπει να εγκριθούν από την
Επιτροπή προτού τεθούν σε εφαρμογή.
46
Κανονισμοί
 Γενικός Κανονισμός όλων των Ταμείων
 Ευρωπαϊκό Ταμείο Περιφερειακής Ανάπτυξης
(ΕΤΠΑ)
 Ευρωπαϊκό Κοινωνικό Ταμείο (ΕΚΤ)
 Ταμείο Συνοχής
 Ευρωπαϊκή Εδαφική Συνεργασία
 Ευρωπαϊκό Γεωργικό Ταμείο Αγροτικής
Ανάπτυξης
 Ευρωπαϊκό Ταμείο Θάλασσας και Αλιείας
47
Αιρεσιμότητες
 Εκ των προτέρων Αιρεσιμότητες: Προϋποθέσεις
που πρέπει να πληρωθούν πριν την υποβολή των
Σ.Σ. και των Ε.Π. Τα Κ-Μ έχουν προθεσμία 2 ετών
από την έγκριση του Σ.Σ. προκειμένου να
πληρώσουν τις προϋποθέσεις αυτές. Μη υλοποίησή
τους εντός των χρονικών ορίων αποτελεί την βάση
για την αναστολή των πληρωμών.
 Αποθεματικό Επίδοσης: 5% από τον
προϋπολογισμό κάθε Σ.Σ. μένει εκτός και διατίθεται
μόνον στα Κ-Μ ή τις Περιφέρειες που κατάφεραν να
«πιάσουν» τους στόχους που έχουν συμφωνηθεί
(στο δικό τους Σ.Σ.). Η εκταμίευση αυτή γίνεται
κατόπιν ενδιάμεσης έκθεσης αξιολόγησης.
48
A menu of thematic objectives
49
Eligibility simulation
50
51
How will funding be allocated?
Διευκόλυνση "Συνδέοντας την Ευρώπη" για μεταφορές, ενέργεια και ΤΠΕ 40.0
52
European Social Fund (ESF)
53
Position paper of the European Commission on
the development of Partnership Agreement and
programmes in Greece for the period 2014-2020
54 54
Regional
Disparities
• Significant divergences regarding
the average GDP for 2007-2009
among the 13 Regions
• 120,1% GDP per capita for Attica
while in Western Greece it is only
66,2%
55 55
Key challenges – Global Vision
Europe 2020 headline
targets
3% of expenditure on R&D
Current situation in
Greece end 2011
National 2020 target
0,6% in 2007
2%
75% of population aged 20-64
should be employed
59,9%
70%
The share of early school leavers
should be under 10%
13,1%
9,7%
At least 40% of 30-34 years old
should have completed a tertiary
or equivalent education
28,9%
32%
Reducing the number of people at
risk of poverty or exclusion by
20 million in the EU
619,000
Reducing by 450,000
20% increase in Energy efficiency
Under revision
2,7 Mtoe
20% of energy from renewables
5,8 % in 2005
8,2 % in 2011
18%
20% Greenhouse gas (GHG)
emissions reduction compared to
1990
-8% (2010 emissions
compared to 2005)
+3% (2020 emissions
compared to 2005)
-4% (national binding target for
non-ETS sectors compared to
2005)
56 56
Key Challenges
Unsustainable
economic model that
lacks competitiveness
High unemployment &
social exclusion
Insufficient key infrastructure
networks
Inefficient use of natural
resources
Weak public
administration
57 57
FUNDING PRIORITIES
1. A Business-friendly Environment
2. Increase Labour Market Participation, Active
Inclusion & Education/Skill Policies
3. Sustainable Key Infrastructure Networks
4. Environment Friendly/Resource-efficient
Economy
5. Reforms For An Efficient & Accountable
Administration
58 58
Funding priority
1
A businessfriendly
environment
• Μείωση του διοικητικού βάρους και της
γραφειοκρατίας , απλοποίηση του
διοικητικού και θεσμικού πλαισίου
ώστε να εξασφαλίζονται αρτιότερες
υπηρεσίες προς τις επιχειρήσεις
• Διευκόλυνση της πρόσβασης σε
χρηματοδότηση, ανάπτυξη
προηγμένων επιχειρηματικών
υπηρεσιών προς στοχευμένες μικροεπιχειρήσεις και ΜΜΕ.
59 59
Funding Priority
1
A businessfriendly
environment
• Έξυπνη στρατηγική εξειδίκευσης
• Επένδυση σε ανθρώπινο κεφάλαιο και
δεξιότητες
• Εξοπλισμός του εργατικού δυναμικού με
τις απαραίτητες δεξιότητες που θα του
επιτρέψει να προσαρμοστεί στις
βιομηχανικές αλλαγές.
60 60
Funding Priority
2
Increase labour
market
participation,
active inclusion
& education/skill
policies
• Υποστήριξη και ένταξη των νέων
ανέργων στην αγορά εργασία με
βελτιωμένες και καινοτόμες πολιτικές
ενεργοποίησης
• Ενίσχυση της αποτελεσματικότητας των
πολιτικών ένταξης για τους ανέργους
• Ενεργός και υγιής γήρανση
61 61
Funding Priority
2
Increase labour
market
participation,
active inclusion
& education/skill
policies
•Προώθηση της ολοκληρωμένης και
βιώσιμης ένταξης στην αγορά εργασίας
•Βελτίωση της ποιότητας της
εκπαίδευσης/κατάρτισης και της Δια Βίου
Μάθησης. Αύξηση της σύνδεσης των
συστημάτων εκπαίδευσης με την αγορά
εργασίας
•Προώθηση των πολιτικών κοινωνικής
ένταξης και καταπολέμησης της φτώχειας
62 62
Funding Priority
3
Sustainable key
infrastructure
networks
•Προώθηση της προσπελασιμότητας
•Ανάπτυξη μίας ολοκληρωμένης
πολυτροπικής στρατηγικής μεταφορών
•Εκσυγχρονισμός των διακρατικών και
συνοριακών σταθμών
•Ενίσχυση των θαλάσσιων συγκοινωνιών και
ενός συνεκτικού και διαλειτουργικού
συστήματος μεταφορών
•Ανάπτυξη λιμενικών υποδομών (μαρίνες)
για ιστιοπλοϊκά σκάφη και θαλαμηγούς
63 63
Funding Priority
3
Sustainable key
infrastructure
networks
•Εκσυγχρονισμός των ενεργειακών
δικτύων, και ειδικότερα του ηλεκτρικού και
φυσικού αερίου
•Εξασφάλιση σύγχρονων υποδομών
διαχείρισης στερεών και υγρών
αποβλήτων
64 64
Funding Priority
4
Environment
friendly and
resourceefficient
economy for
growth and jobs
• Προστασία του περιβάλλοντος και της
αποδοτικής χρήσης των πόρων
• καλύτερη αξιοποίηση των υδάτινων
πόρων
• Προστασία του εδάφους
• Βελτίωση του χωροταξικού σχεδιασμού
• Προστασία και αποκατάσταση των δασών
• Διατήρηση της βιοποικιλότητας (NATURA 2000)
• Εξασφάλιση βιώσιμων
•
* γεωργικών πρακτικών
* παράκτιων κοινοιτήτων (CFP)
65 65
Funding Priority
4
Environment
friendly and
resourceefficient
economy for
growth and jobs
• Προσαρμογή και μείωση της κλιματικής
αλλαγής
• Στρατηγικές πρόληψης για :
• - πυρκαγιές*
- πλημμύρες
- διάβρωση του εδάφους
- ατμοσφαιρική ρύπανση σε μεγάλες πόλεις
66 66
Funding Priority
4
Environment
friendly and
resourceefficient
economy for
growth and jobs
• Υποστήριξη της μετάβασης προς
μία οικονομία χαμηλών εκπομπών
διοξειδίου του άνθρακα και
ανανεώσιμων πηγών ενέργειας
• - Προώθηση της παραγωγής και της
διανομής ενέργειας από ανανεώσιμες πηγές
(αιολική, ηλιακή, γεωθερμική …)
- βελτίωση της ενεργειακής απόδοσης:
στις ιδιωτικές κατοικίες και στα δημόσια
κτίρια
- Καινοτόμες ενεργειακές τεχνολογίες
67 67
Funding Priority
5
Reforms for an
efficient &
accountable
administration
• Ισχυρός κυβερνητικός μηχανισμός
και διυπουργικός συντονισμός
• Απλοποίηση του πολύπλοκου
θεσμικού και διοικητικού πλαισίου
68 68
Funding Priority
5
Reforms for an
efficient &
accountable
administration
• Αποτελεσματική διαχείριση
ανθρώπινων πόρων
• Δικαστική μεταρρύθμιση
• Αποτελεσματική διαχείριση σε τομείς
με σημαντική δημοσιονομική
επίπτωση ( Δημόσιες συμβάσεις,
υγεία κλπ)
69 69
Funding Priority
5
Reforms for an
efficient &
accountable
administration
• E-government (ηλεκτρονική
υπογραφή και ηλεκτρονική
διαβούλευση)
• E-υπηρεσίες προς τους πολίτες
(υποβολή φορολογικών δηλώσεων,
πληρωμή φόρων, έκδοση αδειών
και πιστοποιητικών, κλπ)
70 70
European Territorial Cooperation
Cooperation through the ETC programmes in the
following areas:
• Strengthening research, technological development and
innovation.
• Protecting the environment, promoting resource efficiency,
energy efficiency and renewables.
• Promoting sustainable and intermodal transport
• Supporting modernisation of customs infrastructure,
equipment, and systems.
71 71
European Territorial Cooperation
Cooperation through the ETC programmes in the
following areas:
• Enhancing
the potential of the blue economy (e.g. development
of maritime and coastal tourism) together with reducing maritime
risks and improving maritime safety and security.
• Improving coherence, coordination and alignment of policies and
instruments with impact on the maritime economy (focus on
marine knowledge, Maritime Spatial Planning and Integrated
Maritime Surveillance).
Future programmes of the CSF Funds should take into account the priorities of
a potential maritime strategy for the Adriatic and the Ionian Sea.
72 72
Success Factors for Effective Delivery
Ex-ante conditionalities = preconditions relating to the
efficient use of EU Funds
Administrative reform and administrative efficiency
A comprehensive strategy for inclusive start-up support (Small
Business Act)
Existence and implementation of a national strategy for
poverty reduction
A comprehensive strategy to reduce early school leaving
A digital growth strategy and a national next generation
access (NGA) plan
73 73
Success Factors for Effective Delivery
Ex-ante conditionalities = preconditions relating to the
efficient use of EU Funds
A national or regional strategy on innovation based on smart
specialisation
Adopt a pricing policy for the use of water resources
State aid - an independent body or authority that coordinates
State aid issues, which has appropriate and dedicated
resources (budget, qualified staff) – set up a central state aid
registry.
74 74
Success Factors for Effective Delivery
Ex-ante conditionalities = preconditions relating to the
efficient use of EU Funds
With regard to fisheries and rural development specific
measures to ensure administrative efficiency should be taken
to guarantee the effective implementation
Set up a multi-annual strategic plan for aquaculture.
Full implementation of the EU environmental acquis develop a roadmap for the effective implementation and
respect of the EU environmental “acquis” in the areas of water
waste and solid waste.
75 75
Governance (a)
The new program architecture should guarantee
ownership, proximity of decision making,
effectiveness of interventions, sound and
transparent financial management and
accountability:
• Cooperation at all levels for achieving quality of
spending, efficiency and timely operation.
• Lessons learnt and experience acquired from the
previous programming period should be taken
into account.
76 76
Governance (b)
Coordination between policies and complementarity of
interventions is a key condition for successful
implementation of CSF Fund:
• Strong policy framework and coordination centre shall be
ensured to improve enforcement of the development strategy;
• Clear division of responsibilities and greater accountability of the
institutions involved.
77 77
Governance (c)
• Accountability and ownership
• Active participation of relevant partners
• Reinforce coordination on preparatory works
78 78