Transcript Feb 25

EEES4760/6760
Landscape Ecology
Jiquan chen
Feb. 25, 2009
1. Fragmentation
2. Island Biogeographic Theory (IBT)
1km
50 m
1km
30 m
81 ha
69 ha
59 ha
Case 7.2 (A) Degree of fragmentation of major river basins of the world
7.4 A fragmentation sequence
7.8 A constellation of separate habitat patches may be critical to the survival of
individuals or populations
7.9 Many animals require a suite of different habitats or resources to meet
life history needs
7.13 Roads can be
significant barriers to the
movement of small
vertebrates and
invertebrates
EFFECTS OF FRAGMENTATION
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Landscape structure
· Patch density
· Patch size
· Inter-patch distance
· Connectivity
· Boundary length
· Interior/edge ratio
· Maximum of core (interior forest)
· Total interior
· Stepping stones
· Corridors
Species
· Isolation
· Number of generalist
· Exotic species
· Nest predation
· Extinction rate
· Dispersal of interior species
· Large-home-range species
· Richness of interior species
•
•
•
•
•
Others
· Metapopulation dynamics
· Genetic inbreeding
· Size of disturbance patches
· Cumulative effects (rain, snow and
flooding effects)
The Checkerboard Landscape
Patterns of
clearcutting
development under
various models(a-c)
Progression of
clearcutting using
the dispersed patch
model in which
areas are selected
for cutting so as to
be distributed
regularly across the
landscape: shown
are 25, 50, and 75%
cutover points. (ef) Pattern of cutting
at 50% point using
single, four nucleus,
and aggressiveparallel cutting
systems. (Franklin
& Forman 1987)
Susceptibility of
forests in the
Douglas-fir region to
various damaging
agent along a
landscape cutting
gradient as shown
by the checkerboard
model (Franklin &
Forman 1987)
Creating
Land
Mosaics
An old-growth patch surrounded by a long rotation island that is cut in a
programmed sequence such ( Harris 1984).
Conclusions
•
The number, size, and arrangement of the patches in a mosaic
created by forest managers strongly influence the degree to
which management objectives are fulfilled.
•
Two recommendations are: (1) reduce the emphasis on
dispersing small clearcut patches through the forest
landscape, and (2) identify and reserve large patches of
primeval forest in the landscape for maintenances of interior
and amenity values.
•
SLOSS debate
What do we want to know about fragmentation?
•
•
•
•
•
What are the relationships among patch area, shape, isolation,
edge, the interaction of these factors, and various population and
ecosystem?
How do various landscape elements (e.g., corridors, linear
networks, and matrix) affect ecosystem processes and the
connectivity of populations in fragmented landscapes?
How do pattern-process linkages function in spatially and
temporally dynamic landscapes across the range of spatial and
temporal scales?
What levels of habitat loss and fragmentation does population
viability decline drastically?
How long does it take population and ecosystem processes to
respond to physical changes in the landscape associated with
fragmentation?
Island Biogeographic Theory
1.
Early interest in habitat fragmentation arose from
island biogeographic theory (MacArthur & Wilson 1963 & 1967).
(MacArthur and Wilson, 1963)
19.4 – fish 1982
(Preston, 1962; Nilsson et al. 1988)
19.3 – mammal 1989
The equilibrium
model of island
biogeography by
MacArthur and
Wilson (1963)
Manipulative and Mensurative Experiment
- Two Major Approaches •
•
Manipulative experiment
•
Physically manipulates some attribute of the system in a
controlled manner, while holding all other attributes
constant.
Mensurative experiment
•
Simply observes or measures the system at different
locations or times
•
The treatment is the different conditions in space or
time.
•
Generally, manipulative experiments lead to stronger
inferences and therefore more reliable knowledge than
mensurative experiments.
•
An ideal manipulative experiment requires
•
•
•
•
•
•
The similarity among landscape minimizes the experimental
error
The size of the landscape are functionally relevant to the
process/organism(s) under consideration
Areal extent and configuration manipulation is needed to
assess independent and interactive of processes
Replication and random
Temporal and spatial controls (natural variability)
Observing the delayed effect
Mensurative Experiment
•
Can overcome some of the important limitations
• The practical and logistical difficulties of implementing
large-scale treatment
• No practical limit to the spatial or temporal scale of the
study system
• Flexibility in time lag effect
•
Still problems …
• Additional sources of variation associated with
inconsistent and uncontrolled past perturbations
• Lack in pretreatment control – owing to substituting space
for time – inherent variability and autocorrelation
Lack in …
•
•
•
•
Landscape level study
Isolation of a process
Extinction threshold/ time lag/ synergisms
between habitat area and configuration
Inequity in the organismal focus
•
•
•
Invertebrates, reptiles, and amphibians
Replication / poorly controlled
Spatial information