Transcript Brand map - Network Rail Safety Central

Infrastructure Projects
Planning & Change control
– Suppliers Safety Forum
Update
R Dickinson / J Murphy / R Smith
1
Project Remit
Planning - Problem Statement - Planning is often identified as a causal
factor in accidents and incidents, however what exactly ‘failed’ can often be
unclear
Planning time - Problem Statement - having adequate time and resource
to plan and putting a freeze of change (design, methodology, sequencing etc.)
at a given point prior to the activity
Change - Problem Statement - change occurring and laying dormant and
undetected until the actual work takes place
Change Control Process - Problem Statement - having appropriate
change control processes that assess the impact of the change
Involving the Right People - Problem Statement - Involving
the right people in the planning process – how often does
the supervisor or tradesman get asked to contribute
2
IW & SMIS Event Review
•IP Irregular Working events (118) –
2010/11/12 – 57% show or indicate a
planning issue contributed.
•IP SMIS extract events (700) - 2011/12
– 56% of relevant events show or
indicate a planning issue contributed.
3
The Team
A team was assembled from Network Rail and our supply chain
AMCo –
Andries Lienberg
Carillion –
Rob Tunley
Invensys –
Robert Cairns
Murphy –
John Murphy
Network Rail – Mike Lyons, Mark Tingay
tusp –
Richard Smith
A series of workshops were undertaken with additional work
being carried out outside of these.
4
Project Roadmap
July Meeting – Outcomes of Logic Mapping exercise
Objectives
Less people hurt
Less late changes on work
More efficient delivery
Better interface between stake
holders Understanding the
different drivers of customers, etc
Smoother process than currently
Expected Benefits
Reduction of (safety) loss events
More efficient utilisation of
resources
Improved productivity (10%?)
Improved relationships with
stakeholders and our people
Expected Outcomes
More engaged work force
Better facilities for planning
Improved Long, Medium & short
range planning
Improved briefing - clear &
Concise
Reduced Fatigue (local workforce
utilised)
Change Required
Improved communication
strategy
collaborative working
approach
Changes to standards
and rules
5
Planning
• The working group considered long term – medium term and - short term
planning. The aim being to understand how plans are currently formed and how
they can be improved. The process maps below were developed.
/ T-37
TT-90
6
Actions taken forward July to date
• Task Briefing Sheet development
• Murphy and AMCo undertook internal trials of revised TBS
format. Feedback positive, formats adopted on certain projects.
• SNE S&SD have undertaken an exercise reviewing a number of
current TBS formats and developed a revised / simplified TSB
template for consideration.
7
Actions taken forward July to date
and going forward
The Planning Toolkit
• Review / Finalise Planning Tool Kit requirements
– Concise guidance - consideration of existing good practice gathered
– Mission Room utilisation – Surround vision (currently in use on F2A and
currently looking at York)
– 3 and 4 D Modelling utilisation
– Briefing and training requirements
– Creation of Planning Centres (dedicated locations)
• www.planning-toolkit.co.uk
• Collaborative working group interfaces and opportunities
– (integration with the Route planning process and the
Electrification work stream)
8