Workplace Violence: What To Know What To Do
Download
Report
Transcript Workplace Violence: What To Know What To Do
Workplace Violence:
What To Know
What To Do
William McPeck
Director
Employee Health and Safety
Maine State Government
The Perspective I Bring
Social worker with EAP specialization
Maine State Fire Marshal’s Office
Investigated fires, explosions and arsons
Trained in criminal profiling
Trained in threat assessment
Instructor in non-violent crisis
intervention
What Is Workplace Violence?
Workplace violence
Any act of physical violence – overt aggression
Homicide, physical and sexual assault
Workplace aggression – emotional toll
Expressions of hostility
Gestures, facial expressions and verbal assaults
Threats of physical violence
Harassment, intimidation, bullying
Ostracism/shunning
Obstructionism
Passive/aggressive behaviors that impede job
performance or achievement of organizational
objectives
Source: Joel Neuman, Journal of Management, May/June, 1998
Workplace Violence Can…
Be inflicted by a stranger with
criminal intent, or
Be inflicted by an abusive
Employee, supervisor or manager
Client, patient or customer
Former employee, manager or supervisor
Family member or significant other
Workplace Violence Can…
Affect or involve
Employees
Visitors, customers, patients or clients
contractors
Why the Increase in Workplace
Violence?
Increase in societal tolerance of violence
Acceptance of violence as a form of
communication
Increased accessibility to weapons
Less control over work environment
Lack of careers, commitment and loyalty
Job vs. career
Downsizing, Reengineering
Do more with less
Loss of middle management
Why the Increase in Workplace
Violence? (con’t)
Substance abuse
Psychological factors
Increasing stress
Breakdown of support systems
Nuclear families
Extended families
Sense of neighborhood/community
Change
The increasing pace of change
Ability to cope with pace of organizational
change
Why the Increase in Workplace
Violence? (con’t)
Insatiable electronic media demands
24/7 TV news
The Internet
Government and government workers
easy targets for angry citizens
Changes in government benefits and
services
Entitlement philosophy
How Big Is The Problem?
Source of the statistics needs to be
kept in mind
Two general sources of data
Crime statistics
Occupational injury statistics
OSHA
Bureau of Labor Statistics Annual Survey
National Traumatic Occupational Fatalities
Surveillance System - NIOSH
How Big Is The Problem?
Nationally
1 million individuals are the victim of a
violent workplace crime each year (BJS)
This represents 15% of all violent
crimes committed annually in America (BJS)
The 1998 National Crime Victimization
Survey estimates some 2 million
American workers are victims of
workplace violence each year.
(Source: Bureau of Justice Statistics, 1994)
(Source: National Crime Victimization Study – 1998)
How Big Is The Problem?
Nationally (con’t)
1980 – 1989 nearly 7,600 U.S. workers were
victims of homicide in the workplace
Approximately 12% of all deaths from injury in
the workplace
Causes of death in the workplace
#1 Motor vehicle
#2 Machinery
#3 Homicide
(Source: NIOSH, 1993)
How Big Is The Problem?
Nationally (con’t)
Workplace Homicides
@7,600 1980 – 1989 (NIOSH, 1993)
1,080 in 1994 (BLS)
860 in 1997 (BLS)
645 in 1999 (BLS)
Overall workplace homicide has
remained the third most frequent
cause of fatalities in the workplace
How Big Is The Problem?
Nationally (con’t)
1997, Percent of Work-Related
Homicides by Type
Type
Type
Type
Type
(Source: BLS)
1
2
3
4
Criminal Intent – 85%
Customer/Client – 3%
Co or Past Worker – 7%
Personal Relationship – 5%
How Big Is The Problem?
Nationally (con’t)
From 1980 – 1989, workplace homicide
was the leading cause of fatal
occupational injury for women (NIOSH, 1993)
In 1999, workplace homicide was the
second leading cause of fatal
occupational injury for women (BJS)
How Big Is The Problem?
Nationally (con’t)
Victims of Workplace Violence 1992 –
1996
73.6%
19.7%
4.2%
2.5%
0.05%
Simple Assault
Aggravated Assault
Robbery
Rape and Sexual Assault
Homicide
Source: National Crime Victimization Study - 1998
How Big Is The Problem?
Nationally (con’t)
Fully 99.8% of the victims of workplace
violence survive the assaults they
experience
Source: Joel Neuman, Journal of Management, May/June, 1998
This doesn’t make the experience any
less traumatic!
How Big Is The Problem?
Nationally (con’t)
Average number of violent non-fatal
victimizations in the workplace, 1992 –
1996,by selected occupations
Retail - @285,000
Law Enforcement – @240,000
Teaching - @135,000
Medical - @130,000
Mental Health - @ 75,000
Transportation - @ 65,000
Source: University of Iowa, Injury Prevention Research Center, February 2001
How Big Is The Problem?
Maine’s Experience
(Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics)
Disabling Cases
1997 144 cases
1998 164 cases
1999 218 cases
1.1%
1.3%
1.3%
Maine State Government Employees
Mental health workers
Correctional workers
Law Enforcement personnel
Who Commits Workplace Violence?
80% committed by males
40% committed by complete
strangers
35% committed by casual
acquaintances
19% by individuals well known to
victim
1% by relatives of the victim
(Source: Bureau of Justice Statistics, 1994)
Weapons Used
WORKPLACE HOMICIDES, 1990-1989
Guns – 75%
Knives etc. – 14%
(Source, NIOSH, 1993)
In 62% of the violent crimes the
perpetrator was not armed; in 30% of
the violent crimes the perpetrator
was armed with a handgun
(Source: BJS, 1994)
Where Did The Incidents Occur?
61% in private companies
30% in government agencies
8% involved self-employed
individuals
(Source: BJS, 1994)
What Does Workplace Violence
Cost?
The Economics of Workplace Violence
Three most affected areas are:
Costly litigation
Negligent hiring
Negligent retention
Negligent supervision
Inadequate security
Lost productivity
>
80% for 2 weeks post incident
CISD, investigations, PTSD
Increased turnover
Decreased morale
What Does Workplace Violence
Cost?
The Economics of Workplace Violence
(Continued)
Damage Control
Tangible
Customer buying decisions
Intangible
Media exposure
Community relations
Corporate image
(Source: Workplace Violence Research Institute)
What Does Workplace Violence
Cost?
Estimated that some 500,000
employees miss 1,751,000 days of
work annually or 3.5 days per
incident
This missed work equates to
approximately $55 million in lost
wages
(Source: BJS, 1994)
Classifications of Workplace
Violence
Type
Type
Type
Type
I Criminal Intent
II Customer/Client
III Worker-on-Worker
IV Personal Relationship
Source: University of Iowa, Injury Prevention Research Center, February 2001
Classifications of Workplace
Violence
Type I – Criminal Intent
Perpetrator has no legitimate relationship
to the organization or its employees
A crime is usually being committed in
conjunction with the violence
Robbery, shoplifting, criminal trespassing
Classifications of Workplace
Violence (con’t)
Type II – Customer/Client
The perpetrator has a legitimate
relationship with the organization – The
recipient or object of services provided
by the affected workplace or victim
This category includes customers,
clients, patients, students, inmates, etc.
Classifications of Workplace
Violence (con’t)
Type III – Worker-on-Worker
The perpetrator is an employee or past
employee of the organization who
attacks or threatens fellow past or
present employees
May be seeking revenge for what is
perceived as unfair treatment
Includes employees, supervisors and
managers
Classifications of Workplace
Violence (con’t)
Type IV – Personal Relationship
The perpetrator usually does not have a
legitimate relationship with the organization, but
has or has had a personal relationship with the
intended victim
May involve a current or former spouse, lover,
relative, friend, or acquaintance
Domestic violence carried out at the workplace
The perpetrator is motivated by perceived
difficulties in the relationship or by psychosocial
factors that are specific to the perpetrator
What Are Possible Risk Factors?
Exchange of money with the public
Working alone or in small numbers
Working late night or early morning
Working in high crime areas
Guarding valuable property or
possessions
Working in community settings
(e.g. taxicab drivers, retail clerks, police)
What Are Possible Risk Factors?
(con’t)
Where alcohol/drugs sold or
dispensed
Exposure to unstable or volatile
persons? (e.g. health care, social services, criminal
justice settings)
Employees deciding on benefits, or in
some way controlling a person’s
future, well-being or freedom? (Such as a
government agency does)
(Source: NIOSH)
Conditions Allowing Workplace
Violence
Individual Characteristics
Precipitating Events or Conditions
System Characteristics
Source: Workplace Solutions, 1997
Conditions Allowing Workplace
Violence (con’t)
Individual Characteristics
Paranoid personality and thinking
Drug and/or alcohol problem
Life stressor – divorce/separation,
illness, helplessness, loss or control,
isolation
Conditions Allowing Workplace
Violence (con’t)
Precipitating events or conditions
Termination
Job changes
Harassment by co-workers or
supervisors
Conditions Allowing Workplace
Violence (con’t)
System Characteristics
Not recognizing or ignoring early warning
signs
Indifference to the needs of employees
Poor management of downsizings,
terminations and accidents
Punishing or terminating impaired or
deviant employees
Poor or non-existent communication
between labor and management
Conditions Allowing Workplace
Violence (con’t)
System Characteristics (con’t)
Information that could signal problems is
not shared
Lack of commitment and involvement by
top management
Indicators of Potential Workplace
Violence
Intimidating, harassing, bullying,
belligerent or other inappropriate and
aggressive behavior
Numerous conflicts with customers,
co-workers or supervisors
Bringing a weapon to the workplace
(unless job related)
Making inappropriate references to
guns
Indicators of Potential Workplace
Violence (con’t)
Making threats or idle threats about
using a weapon to harm someone
Making statements showing a
fascination with incidents of
workplace violence
Making statements indicating
approval of the use of violence to
resolve a problem
Indicators of Potential Workplace
Violence (con’t)
Making statements indicating the
identification with perpetrators of
workplace homicides
Statements indicating desperation
over family, financial or other types of
personal problems
Statements about contemplating
suicide
Indicators of Potential Workplace
Violence (con’t)
Direct or veiled threats of harm
Substance abuse
Extreme changes in normal behavior
Source: U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1998
Profile of the Most Likely Type III
Perpetrator
A male, aged 25 to 40 years
Has a history of violence
Tends to be a loner
Owns several weapons
Has requested some form of
assistance in the past
Exhibits frequent anger
Has a history of conflict with others
Profile of the Most Likely Type III
Perpetrator (con’t)
Has a history of family or marital problems
After periods of verbalizing anger, will
become withdrawn
Is paranoid
Exhibits self-destructive behavior such as
alcohol and/or drug use
Remember, don’t take profile too literally
Source: www.svn.net/mikekell/v3.html
Behavior Warning Signs of Potential
Violence and Their Probability of
Occurrence
Male (80% or better)
White (75% or better)
Working age (90% or better)
Will display one or more of the
following behaviors (90% or better)
A history of violence
Evidence of psychosis
Evidence of abnormally strong sexual
desire (erotomania)
Behavior Warning Signs of Potential
Violence and Their Probability of
Occurrence (con’t)
Evidence of drug and/or alcohol
dependence
Evidence of depression and withdrawal
A pattern of pathological blaming
Evidence of impaired neurological
functioning
An elevated frustration level
An interest/fascination in weapons
Evidence of a personality disorder
Behavior Warning Signs of Potential
Violence and Their Probability of
Occurrence (con’t)
Unexplained increase in absenteeism
Noticeable decrease in attention to
appearance and personal hygiene
Has a plan to “solve all problems”
Resistance and over reaction to changes
in policies or procedures
repeated violations of the organization’s
policies
Behavior Warning Signs of Potential
Violence and Their Probability of
Occurrence (con’t)
The following behaviors are commonly exhibited, but
have an uncertain probability:
Will vocalize or otherwise act out, violent
intentions prior to committing a violent act
Over a sustained period of time, will exhibit
behaviors that are interpreted as insignificant,
strange, bizarre or threatening by coworkers
and supervisors
Remember: These are general guidelines.
Exceptions will always occur
Source: Workplace Violence Research Institute
Preventing Workplace Violence
Three general approaches to
prevention
Environmental
Administrative/Organizational
Behavioral/Interpersonal
Source: University of Iowa, Injury Prevention Research Center, February 2001
Preventing Workplace Violence
(con’t)
Environmental
Adequate inside and outside lighting
Secure entrances and exits
Security hardware
Turnstiles
Key cards
Smart cards
Biometric systems
Physical barriers
Preventing Workplace Violence
(con’t)
Environmental (con’t)
Metal and Explosives Detectors
Security Forces
Uniformed vs. Business Attire
Armed vs. unarmed
Specialized customer/client meeting
rooms
Other engineering controls
Preventing Workplace Violence
(con’t)
Administrative/Organizational
Programs
Workplace Violence Plan
Threat Assessment Team
EAP
Policies
Harassment
Workplace violence
SOPs
Preventing Workplace Violence
(con’t)
Administrative/Organizational (con’t)
Hiring and Termination Practices
Hiring
Corroborate information on applications/resumes
(42% contain intentional misstatements of material
facts)
Interview – Use of open-ended questions
Looking for a pattern of aggressive behavior
Conduct background investigation
Firing
Consider the possibility of violent response
Plan out – script out the procedure
Preventing Workplace Violence
(con’t)
Administrative/Organizational (con’t)
Work Practice Controls - Work practices
aimed at maintaining a safe working
environment – Written procedures and
guidelines
Preventing Workplace Violence
(con’t)
Behavioral/Interpersonal
Changing employee attitudes toward security –
It won’t happen to me
Staff training – Train staff to anticipate,
recognize and respond to conflict and potential
violence in the workplace
Personal security techniques
Non-violent crisis intervention techniques
De-escalation techniques
Communication techniques
How to report violent, inappropriate, disruptive
or threatening behavior
Preventing Workplace Violence
(con’t)
Supervisor/manager training – in
addition to the staff level training,
supervisors and managers should receive
training in:
Creating a positive work culture/climate
that supports employees
Developing skills for displaying compassion,
concern and support for employees –
employee trust is critical
How to best utilize the EAP
Preventing Workplace Violence
(con’t)
Supervisor/manager training (con’t)
Performance management
Administering progressive discipline
Contract management/grievance
handling
Employee counseling/coaching
Special Considerations For
Managers/Supervisors
What are the workplace violence risks at
the worksites you run?
Indicators that employees need immediate
intervention
Excessive tardiness or absences
An increased need for supervisory attention or
supervision
Reduced productivity
Inconsistent work habits
Strained workplace relationships
Special Considerations For
Managers/Supervisors (con’t)
Inability to concentrate
Violation of safety procedures
New, sudden involvement in accidents or
violations
Changes in health or hygiene
Unusual or sudden behavioral change
Fascination with weapons
Alcohol and/or drug abuse
Anonymous, confidential screening
1-877-788-4173
Special Considerations For
Managers/Supervisors (con’t)
Stress
Excuses and Blaming
Depression
Anonymous and confidential screening
1-877-788-4173
Responding to Workplace Violence
Facility Emergency Action Plan
Threat Assessment Team
Emergency Response Team
CISD
EAP and Behavioral Health Services
Media Contact
Organizational Recovery/Continued
Operation Plan
Special Issues for Field Forces
Need to develop specific safety
guidelines to employee’s specific
situation and the problems they are
likely to encounter
Preparation of daily work
plans/itinerary (e.g. flight plan)
Maintaining periodic contact
throughout their tour of duty
Special Issues for Field Forces
(con’t)
Use of a buddy system
Need to recognize potentially
dangerous situations ahead of time,
so back-up can be secured/started or
a strategy implemented so the
employee does not go in alone
Source: U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1998
For Further Information:
William McPeck
Director, Employee Health and Safety
Maine State Government
114 Sate House Station
Augusta, ME 04333
207-287-6783 (voice)
207-287-6796 (fax)
[email protected]