managing flash floods risk perception from a cultural perspective
Download
Report
Transcript managing flash floods risk perception from a cultural perspective
Cultural psychology and
hazards research
An integrated model for risk
perception and warning response
behavior
Ashley Coles
University of Arizona
Outline
Background literature and
theoretical framework
– Risk perception research
– Cultural psychology
– An integrated model
Photo: http://www.foe.co.uk
Case study: Flash floods
in Tucson, AZ
Risk perception research
Typical approaches
There is an appropriate
response, anything else is
irrational
Behavior as a result of
psychological
(dys?)function
Behavior as a result of
human nature
More recently and
frequently, studies are
beginning to account for
the effects of cultural and
social contexts
Photo: http://www.glassbird.com
What is culture?
A way of life learned from and shared by a
social unit
– Attitudes, beliefs, values, and habits
While many regard culture as a national or
multi-national variable, it also includes
subgroups based on “gender, ethnicity,
religion, cohort or generation, historical
period, profession, social class, and
country of origin” (Kitayama & Markus, 1995, p. 368)
What role does culture play in risk
perception and behavior?
Norms, values, and practices influence how
individuals process information and make
decisions
Actions become embedded in the culture, acting
to either reinforce or transform the culture
Cultural
Norms/values
Cognitive
processes
e.g. Kitayama and Markus, 1995
Actions/Inactions
Main cultural factors
Trust
– In science, government, and responsible agency
Self-efficacy
– How confident people feel in their ability to handle
ordinary life as well as extreme events
Social incorporation
– Extent of social networks
Social autonomy
– Degree of freedom to fill any
social role
Time perspective
– Focus on past, present, or future
Photo: http://rfcd.pima.gov/alertsys
Proposed integrated model
Hazard information
Group Identities
Gender
Age
Values
Ethnicity
Socioeconomic
Etc.
Cultural Factors
Trust
Self-efficacy
Incorporation
Autonomy
Time perspective
Risk Perception
Behavior
Implications for mitigation
Education and information not likely to
change attitudes, values, and beliefs
Risk managers must speak to these
attitudes, values, and beliefs
Diversity?
– Which means that
managers must “know”
the people they are
responsible for protecting
Photo: http://www.sonoma.edu
Case study: Tucson, AZ
Frequent heavy
downpours during
summer monsoon
season
Many low water
crossings and roads
built to convey water
Barricades, signs, and
even laws meant to
deter motorists often
fail
Research design
Workshop with flood risk
management agencies
in Tucson to share
information and gather
input
Surveys to Tucson residents to elicit cultural
factors and behavior during flash floods
(historical, typical, hypothetical)
Multiple regression and factor analyses to see
which cultural factors appear to have the highest
impact on behavior – and how
Conclusion
If cultural factors seem to influence risk
perception, socio-cultural contexts should be
considered in the development of warnings as
well as educational materials
Thank you!
Acknowledgements
Guidance and academic support
– Drs. Katie Hirschboeck, Marv Waterstone, Stephanie
Fryberg, Eve Gruntfest
Financial support
– For travel and conference fees
Hazards Specialty Group, Dept. of Geography and Regional
Development (UA), Graduate and Professional Student
Association (UA)
– For research
Climate Assessment of the Southwest (CLIMAS)
Spanish translation and other assistance
– Rolando Diaz, Abigail Sotelo, Dr. Sarah Moore, Susan
Kaleita, Helen Yoon