Transcript BIG camp - Oikodomos

SPECIALIZED AT CAAD
FA STU BA 2009/2010

Teacher guarantee – ing.arch v. joklová, phd

students – andrej šabo ( 3rd year )
andrea stieflerová ( 2nd )
michal pisarčík ( 3rd )
bálint takács ( 4th )
Gergely kunyik ( 4th )
BIG camp
EFFICIENT HOUSING
EFFICIENT HOUSING


Our buildings consume about a third of our energy production and they usually don´t offer
very healthy indoor environment. Both these aspects need improvement and we are
looking for the most efficient tools, inspired by factor 4 or even factor 10 requirements.
Efficient building is possible and affordable, sophisticated architectural design is the base
of this efficincy together with innorative technologies.
If we build a new house, which fulfil the condictions of todays applicable standards,
consume for heating will be roughly 100 kwh/m2 every year. Virtually by the same
construction cost and without any special measures can be built section house, which
energy consumption for heating will be approximately on semi. Calculated energy
consuption for house would be not more then 70 kwh/m2 every year. Only by better
insulation and draft solution without thermal bridges can receive a value of about one third
lower. We can called this relatively efficienct housing: the same comfort we have operating
costs roughly semi.
(references – špaček R. pivko h.,effecient housing, 2008 )
NEW VISION




Low-energy house corresponds to the factor 2. can we go still further in raising efficiency of
housing section? Yes, we can- and also it sounds shocking a factor of 10 is realistic target,
achieved in euripe for thousands of home.
Tool to achieve it is the concept of so-called passive house- the house that need so little
heat in winter, that one-third covered sunflower power, without special eguipment, just
across the window (so called passive manner- and thus the name ), next one-third of the
heat from human staying and domestic service consumers, and only the remaining third
section we add the external energy source and pay for it.
The passive house calls if the energy demand for heating drops bellow 15 kwh/m2 every
year. When we include energy consuption of hot water and operation of houses
technology, real savings are typically around 80%.
In assesing the feasibility of such visions is also important question, how much such a giant
leap the cost-effectiveness. In austria and germany, where such house is up, the statistic
say about 8 or 10% increase in investment.
Scheme no 1 – constructive solutions low energy house
scheme no 2 – the cost to increase operational efficiency of the
house.
-Energy costs
--cost improvement
--total cost
1.- low-energy house well known also for glazed areas on
south side of the building.
2.- passive house can be also present by an exclusive
architecture ( family house in linz ) .
Territorial analysis
Our intetion was to creat a coherent urban environment with a simple
structure, clear and sufficient follow-up connections to transport network.
Country – slovakia
City – capital, bratislava
Area – dubravka, lamac, devinska koliba
From left – dubravka, connection to the highway
From right – nature, gardens- devínska koliba
Re-vitalisation of former glass factory
Developement areas in neighbourhood
Dubravka , lamac – extended from line
Big camp – near to center of bratislava
Territorial analysis
description
Factory
Residential
Buildings
Family houses
Reilway
Design variants
Our intetion was to creat a coherent urban
environment with a simple structure, clear and
sufficient follow-up connections to transport
network.
Department of privacy from the public space by
internal means.
Separation from the residential area of industrial.
Accessibility by public transport – bus, trolley,
train.
Accessibility by the main road.
Separation from family houses
Lack of greenery and water aeras.
Residential complex by the sports area, leisure
parks, pedestrian aera, civil and menities by with
interconnection.
Design variants
Description :
Water area
Railway station
Residential buildings
Family housing
Services, trade
Office buildings
Forest park
Sports complex
Parking
Pedestrian zone
proposal
DESCRIPTION :
Residential housing
Family housing
Sports complex
Services, trade
Office buildings
Technical glass
PROPOSAL ANALYSIS - description











Various zones are connected to each other between work continuity.
Family housies in counties – more privacy
Amenities – in the middle of disposition, around the main pedestrian zone
Sports facilities – after district, near the forest
The main pedestrian zone builds on public transport
mass – composition analysis
Regularly by internal
Sorting by priority
Symetric square
Mass balance – enough space for parking and green area
tower analysis
The growing tendency toward the main pedestrian zone
Tallest buildings – factory, technical glass
Proposal analysis
Description – left side:
Habitation
Polyfuncion
Pedestrian zone
Admin. center
Sports compex
Technical glass- factory
Description –right side
3-floor buildings
4- floor buildings
6-floor buildings
Detail by internal



Each by internal – square floorplan, regular shapes, sealed unit
Part of the courtyard – private part, playground, leisure park, benches, toward
the courtyard are oriented living rooms and bedrooms
Street section – the main entrance into the building, parkink, connection to
public network
Detail by internal
Description :
Solved object
4-floor building
Transport
communication
Inputs into the building
Visualization by internal
Internal view of the court
Street view
Ground plan view
West view
East view
South view
Floor ground plan
2. Floor grondplan
North view
4. Floor groundpl.
visualisation