Day 26 & 27: Ethical and Legal issues
Download
Report
Transcript Day 26 & 27: Ethical and Legal issues
Legal and Ethical Issues
Chapter 14
Mental Health and the Legal System:
An Overview
A variety of legal and ethical issues exist in regard
to mental health and abnormal psychology
The nature of civil vs. criminal commitment
Balancing ethical considerations vs. legal considerations
The role of psychologists in legal matters
Expert witnesses, forensic psychology
Rights of patients and research subjects
Practice standards and the changing face of mental health
care
Civil Commitment: Overview, Criteria,
and Oversight Authority
Civil Commitment Laws
Address legal declaration of mental illness
Address when a person can be placed in a hospital or institution
for treatment
Such laws and what constitutes mental illness vary by state
"Mental illness" means a substantial disorder of thought, mood,
perception, psychological orientation or memory that significantly
impairs judgment, behavior, capacity to recognize reality or
ability to meet the ordinary demands of life; (OS §43A-1-103-3)
Dangerousness to Self or Others: Central to Commitment
Proceedings
Assessing dangerousness: The role of mental health professionals
Knowns and unknowns about violence and mental illness
Civil Commitment
General Criteria for Civil Commitment
Demonstrate that a person has a mental illness and needs
treatment (often exclude substance use/abuse)
Show that the person is dangerous to self or others
Bias based on gender, race/ethnicity
Predicting groups with higher likelihood of dangerous behavior
vs predicting individual’s likelihood of dangerous beh.
Establish a grave disability – Inability to care for self
Governmental Authority Over Civil Commitment
Police power – Protection of the health, welfare, and safety
of society
Parens patriae – State acts a surrogate parent
Civil Commitment - Changes
Supreme Court cases prohibit confinement of
nondangerous person who is capable of surviving by
self or with help of willing & responsible family or
friends
More restrictive commitment laws may result in
mentally ill being jailed for criminal offenses
Deinstitutionalization movement led to increase in
homelessness rate
Of the 2.5 – 3.5 million homeless, 25-30% are mentally ill
Lack of community mental health facilities to replace large
inpatient hospitals
The Civil Commitment Process
Initial Stages (OK)
Protective custody
Emergency Evaluation (<12 hours)
Emergency Detention (<72 hours)
Subsequent Stages
Involve normal legal proceedings in most cases
Determination is made by a judge regarding whether to
commit the person
Criminal Commitment
Insanity Defense
M’Naghten Rule – do not know nature & quality of act
performing, or did not know act was wrong
Irresistible impulse – even if aware that act was wrong, no
longer had power to choose between right & wrong (lacked
free agency)
Durham Rule – was criminal act the result of mental
disorder?
American law Institute Standard – because of mental
illness/defect, must lack capacity to understand criminality
of behavior or to avoid it (M’Naghten & Irresistible
impulse); but cannot be result of antisocial or repeated
criminal behavior
Insanity Defense (cont’d)
Insanity Defense Reform Act (1984) if due to mental illness or
mental retardation unable to appreciate wrongfulness of conduct
at the time of the offense
Diminished capacity – mental illness can diminish ability to
understand nature and impact of one’s behavior; issue of intent
Public perception of frequency of insanity defense and the
time of hospitalization is highly inaccurate
Fewer than 1% cases use insanity defense
Length of hospitalization often longer than prison term if had
been convicted of the crime
Guilty but Mentally Ill – convicted, but either go to prison or
mental hospital, or combination of 2 (sentence given)
Competency to Stand Trial
Must be able to participate in own defense,
understand the legal proceedings
Typically sent to mental facility for treatment, if
regain competency may then be brought to trial or
may never be brought to trial
Patient’s Rights: An Overview
The Right to Treatment
Mentally ill persons cannot be involuntarily committed
without treatment
Treatment includes active efforts to reduce symptoms and
provide humane care
The Right to the Least Restrictive Alternative
Treatment within the least confining and limiting
environment
The Right to Refuse Treatment
Often in cases involving medical or drug treatment
Persons cannot be forced to become competent via taking
antipsychotic medication
Patient’s Rights: An Overview (cont.)
The Right to Confidentiality vs. Duty to Warn
Confidentiality – Protection of disclosure of personal
information
Limits to confidentiality
Duty to Warn – Tarasoff
Suspicion of neglect or abuse of children or “vulnerable
adults”
Court order
Releases of Information
The Right to Informed Consent
Nature of treatment proposed
Conditions of treatment, including confidentiality
Alternatives to treatment
Research Participant Rights: An Overview
The Right to be Informed About the Research
Involves informed consent, not simply consent alone
The Right to Privacy
Right to be Treated with Respect and Dignity
Right to be Protected from Physical and Mental
Harm
Right to Chose or to Refuse to Participate in
Research Without Negative Consequences
Right to Anonymity with Regard to Reporting of
Study Findings
Right to Safeguarding of Records
Clinical Practice Guidelines and Standards
Agency for Health Care Policy and Research
Focus on delivery of efficient and cost-effective mental
health services
Dissemination of relevant state-of-the-art information to
practitioners
Establish clinical practice guidelines for assessment and
treatment
American Psychological Association’s Practice
Guidelines
Standards for clinical efficacy research
Standards for clinical effectiveness research
Examples include APA Division 12 list of empiricallysupported treatments