European Diplomacy and the First World War 1870-1923
Download
Report
Transcript European Diplomacy and the First World War 1870-1923
European Diplomacy and the changing balance of
power after 1870
Europe in 1870-1914
The impact of the unification of Germany, 1871
-Germany became THE GREAT POWER OF EUROPE
* economic and political rivalry
• The 1870-1914 period is considered to be one of the most
momentous periods in the history of the modern world:
- time of industrial growth and urbanisation
- an age of imperialism
- an era dominated by nationalism
- each state produced more and more sophisticated
weapons and each believed itself superiour
→ the idea that the war could not be prevented!
The Great Powers of Europe
Germany
France
Great Britain
Austria-Hungary
Russia
Italy?
The Ottoman Empire?
How did the Great Powers differ from each other in their
politics, economy and foreign policy aims?
Make a mind map dealing with the Great Powers
Use these words:
- Parliamentary monarcy
- Kaiser and chancellor
- Authoriatarian state
- Dual monarchy
- Democratic republic
- Industrialisation
- Population growth
- Duma
- Autocracy
- Foreign loans
- Pan-Slavism
- Military power
- Trade
- colonial expansion
- slow economic growth
- slow population growth
- nationalities conflicts
- Balkan interests
- sea power
- battle fleet
The Eastern Question; Turkey
Turkey= The Ottoman Empire
* map p. 13; ” European Turkey”
* The Sultan Rule faced problems; nationalism,
European interests ( Serbia, Austria-Hungary,
Russia..)
* Balkan states wanted to gain independence
* The Turkish economy was subjected to
European commercial groups ( which exploited the
Turkish economy)
→ Uprisings/ in 1909 a revolution in Turkey
Bismarck and Europe
Bismarck´s aims/ foreign policy
* to guarantee peace!
* Germany was a very strong country; no
challenge from Austria-hungary/ Russia or from
France
* B. wanted to reassure the leaders of Europe that
he was a man of peace→ personal contacts between
the leaders → DREIKAISERBUND/ three Emperors
League in 1873
* the aim was to guarantee peace and stability
” the desire of the Emperors to stand together against
republicanism and socialism”
To reduce the risks of war ( Austro-Russian interests in
Balkan)
Consultations when needed, not a military alliance
” Is war in Sight”, Berlin Post-article in 1875- a
diplomatic warning for all other countries..
Bismarck and The Crisis of
1875-8, Turkey
The Balkan area started to challenge the Turkish tule; Bosnia-
Herzegovina, in 1875→Christian peasants started an uprising, spread
to Bulgaria.. The Turks massacred over 10 000 Bulgarians
*Austrian interests, Russian interests ( Pan-Slavism), the British
interests →→ Bismarck wanted to follow a low approach, but was
forced to change his approach to a more active role to ENSURE
GERMANY´S SECURITY
• Russo ( Serbia) -Turkish war 1877-78, Russia won and dictated a
severe peace treaty of San Stefano → The European Turkey would
be reduced a lot and the Russian interests would be guaranteed
BUT OTHER GREAT POWERS DID NOT REGOCNISE THE TREATY
AND IT WAS REVISED ( Austria-H and Britain were ready to start a
war on Russia)→ The Treaty of Berlin of 1878, p. 23
The Berlin Treaty of 1878
Bulgaria was divided into four; Northern part was
granted full independence ( under Russian
supervision), one for Turkey (Macedonia) and
Province named Rumelia was to get autonomy under
Turkish Rule
Bessarabia and Batum to Russia ( map, p.13)
Bosnia-H. to Austria
Cyprus to Britain ( also the right to send war ships to
the Black Sea)
The Significance of the Berlin
Treaty
The Russian domination on the Balkans was prevented
The Turkish behaviour on the Balkan people became
under control
The Balkan countries were not given independence;
the Treaty crushed down the idea of nationalism ( for a
moment!)
Germany´s and Bismarck´s influence on the European
affairs increased→ B. prestige as a statesman at its
height.
The Alliance System / Bismarck
The impact of the Berlin Treaty of 1878
- The Turkish question was solved for a moment..
- Russian hostility
- Austria-Hungary became the priority for
Bismarck→ The Dual Alliance, 1879 between
Germany and Austria-Hungary ( a secret pact)
* against Russian military attack
* an attack by any other country
would require neutrality
Dreikaiserbund II, 1881
Russia felt herself unsecure and Bismarck pressured
Austria to join
The neutrality of the partners if she was at war with
another Power
German security was increased; no Russo-Francohostility against Germany in the near future..
The Triple Alliance, 1882
Could Bismarck count on Russian´s reliability?
* attempts to Franco-Russian alliance..
• Germany, A-H. and Italy ( Bismarck did not consider
Italy one of the Great Powers..)guaranteed their
neutrality or either support whenever they were
attacked by France or by Russia
- G. and I. were entitled to support from each
other against an attack by France
- If A.-H. was attacked by Russia; italy would stay
neutral, but would secure the Southern
frontier of Austria
Bismarck and colonies, 1884-90
Bismarck felt himself and Germany quite confident
because of the alliance system→ he changed his approach
on the colonial system and decided to favour the policy of
acquiring colonies
Why?
Colonies might serve a useful political purpose
( elections of 1884..)
Colonies would benefit the German economy ( new
markets, raw materials..)
Use imperialism as a way of distracting attention from
social problems in Germany
Colonies/ Bismarck
In 1884-85 claims to territories in Africa ( map. P.45)
- Togo
-Cameroon
- South West Africa
- German East Afcia ( 1890)
* B. wanted to challenge British commercial and imperial
interests, but by the late 1880´s B. made concessions to
Britain and was satisfied with a bit smaller area from East
Africa ( ” My map of Africa lies in Europe. Here is Russia
and here is France and we are in the middle”)
The Bismarckian system under
Pressure, 1885-90
The Question on Bulgaria
- Revolts
- an enlarged independent Bulgaria was
established ( British proposal, France and Italy
backed)→ Russia forced the Prince of Bulgaria
to abdicate → Austrians warned Russia for
further interference
- Bismarck took no sides, Russians refused ot
renew the DREIKAISERBUND
* secret Russian-German alliance in 1887
The Reinsurance Treaty of 1887
G. regognised Russian´s right to influence in Bulgaria,
R´s control of the Dardanelles Straits ( when needed!)
If either power was at war, the one should stay neutralunless France or either Austria-Hungary were the
object of attack.
Bismarck was playing with two cards
International tension was increasing: Mediterranean
agreements, French revenge, Russia/Austria-Hungary
and the Balkans..
The Mediterranean
Agreementss, 1887
Bismarck encouraged Britain to make an agreement
with Italy and Austria-Hungary to defend the status
quo in both the Mediterranean and the Far East
Britain to check Russia in Bulgaria and at the Straits, if
necessary, Austrian troops and British warships with
Italian backing would come to help..
Again Bismarck was playing with two cards..
Bismarck´s foreign policy 187190: Success or Failure?
” His concern was the security of the German Empire;
his achievement was the domination of Europe”
Discuss this view of B. foreign policy.
To what extent is it fair to say that B. foreign policy,
1871-90 was a success?
The Road to the First World
War
1) CAUSES
•
Long-term causes
- Alliance system
- Economic and Imperial rivalry
- the Arms race
- Battle plans
- public opinion
- Balkan nationalism
Short-term causes
- crises between 1905-13 ( Balkan nationalism,
colonial rivalry in Africa)
- battle plans
- public opinion
- the Assassination of Franz Ferdinand
( paving the way for the Blank Cheque)
The Alliance system and German
foreign policy after Bismarck
B. was replaced by Caprivi in 1890; the Reinsurance
Treaty with Russia was not renewed
” a New Course” - Rejecting the Bismarckian system
G.´s international position was weakened, lacked a
clear sense of direction
The Schlieffen Plan was worked out in the 1890´s: a
military strategy to combat the Franco-Russian
combination: to avoid a two-front war simultaneously
- first to take over France and then German forces
would move to the eastern front to fight against the
Russians
Hopes for an alliance with Britain: Germany failed to
secure it
- G. made concessions to Britain in Africa
- Britain´s rivalry with France and Russia
-- a huge disappointment!
• Germany, the troublemaker!
- an agreement with Russia?
-” The Kruger Telegram”, supported the
independence of Transvaal ( against Britain)
The Introduction of Welt
Politik, 1890´s
”World Policy”
- emphasis on expansion, overseas expansion and
the creation of a big navy
- Bulow / Foreign ministry
- Admiral von Tirpiz/ the head of the navy office
* to become a World Power!
World policy / Welt Politik
German´s unstable and old-fashioned political system
dominated by Kaiser
Response to socialism and democracy
Imperialism was to substitute for unwanted social
change ( industrialisation; the growth of middle class
and the industrial classes)
Results; Kiaochow, Shantung from China, some
islands in the Pacific
Entente Cordiale / France+ Britain was a setback
Long-term/ short- term causes
for WWI
Explain the causes with your pair
Interpretations
* F. Fisher ( Blank-Cheque by Germany)
* G. Lowes Dickinson ( alliances)
* Marxist historians; Lenin ( imperialism,
economic rivalry)
* F. Fellner ( Imperial frictions increased tension,
Austria-Slavs, Britain-colonies)
* A.J.P. Taylor ( Germany-Russia)
N. Ferguson ( The Arms Race, in 1914 Britain still in the
lead– 29 Dreadnoughts ( BR) 17 ( Ger.)Britain was to be
blamed !, G. was not strong enough, wanted a war to be a
world power!)
Churchill ( Battle Plans; British navy had plans for a swift
intervention in the German attack on Belgium and France)
R. Brooke ( public opinion; a view of war as a liberating
experience)
James Joll ( alliances, Balkan question, the crises of 190513)
Kennan ( Franco-Russian alliance, mobilisation of Russia