Transcript Experiences and lessons learned from the TNA of Cambodia

UNFCCC Workshop on
Technology Needs Assessments
CAMBODIAN TNA CURRENT
STATUS
By Uy Kamal
Mitigation Team Leader
1-2 June 2011
Bonn, Germany
Contents
1. Getting organized for TNA
2. Identify development priorities related to CC
3. Technology analysis and prioritization using
MCDA Model
4. Lessons learned
1. Getting Organized for TNA (1/3)
National Climate Change Mngt. Structure
TNA Coordination and
Implement Structure
1. Getting Organized for TNA (2/3)
Cambodia uses its existing climate change institutional
structure to implement TNA project:
The National Climate Change Committee (NCCC)
serves as the National TNA Project Steering Committee
The Climate Change Department serves as the Project
Coordinator
Selected members of the CDM Inter-ministerial and
Adaptation Ad-hoc Working Groups are invited to join
the National TNA Teams (mitigt. & adapt.)
The National TNA Teams are supported by national
consultants/experts (Academic and research institute)
1. Getting Organized for TNA (3/3)
From regional Capacity Building to National Action
•
The 1st RCB Workshop Sept 15-17, 2010
•
The 2nd RCB Workshop Jan 18-21, 2011
 The TNA Handbook, the
Multi-Criteria Decision
Analysis (MCDA)
Techniques, Cost and
Financial Model,
Technology Fact sheet,
Technology-Barrier
Analysis, etc., were
introduced.
2. Identify development priorities
relate to CC
 Use existing key gov’t documents i.e. The Cambodian
MDGs, The Rectangular Strategy, The National Strategic
Development Plan (NSDP) Update 2009-2013, Sectoral
Strategic Plans, National Adaptation Programme of Action
(NAPA), Draft Second National Communication (SNC),
and other sources such as ClimateTechWiki, etc.
A preliminary list of proposed
adaptation and mitigation
options/technologies has
been selected.
2.1 Priority sectors and sub-sector for
CC adaption and mitigation (1/4)
Examples in Adaptation
Sub-sector
Technology
Rice production





Water saving measures
Irrigation strategies
Improved drought resistance of rice crop strains
Improved seed varieties
Changes in consumer behavior concerning food
Food crops





Drought-resistant crop varieties (biotechnology)
Improved crops distribution systems
Crop rotation systems
Crop research and development
Gene technology
Livestock



Animal feed changes
Improved animal husbandry practices
Changes in location or animal type
2.1 Priority sectors and sub-sector for
CC adaption and mitigation (2/4)
Examples in Adaptation
Sub-sector
Technology
Water Supply for
Agriculture


Increase reservoir technology
Efficiency irrigation systems
Water Demand for
Agriculture




Increase water use technology
Reduce leakage in distribution systems
Seasonal forecasting
Water demand management
Coastal Protection





Dikes, levees (dam), floodwalls
Detached breakwaters
Floodgates, tidal barriers
Saltwater intrusion barriers
Wetland restoration
2.1 Priority sectors and sub-sector for
CC adaption and mitigation (3/4)
Examples in Mitigation
Energy
Option/Technology


Energy Industries




Transport Sector

Grid Connection REEs,
Grid Connection Auto Producers,
Grid Connection Battery Charging Station,
Solar Power Plant, and
Solar Home System.
Hybrid Cars,
Motor Vehicle Inspection,
Electric scooters and Bicycles,
Public transport, etc.,
 Rice Milling Efficiency/Technology Change,
Rice cultivation Garment Industry Efficiency/Technology Change,
 Brick Works Efficiency/Technology Change
2.1 Priority sectors and sub-sector for
CC adaption and mitigation (4/4)
Examples in Mitigation
Non-Energy
Technology
Agriculture

Rice cultivation


Livestock

Agricultural soil

management

Land Use Change and
Forestry

Composting,
Biogas effluent,
Posphogypsum
Small Scale Biogas,
Aquaculture/healthy diet
Organic input agriculture,
Bio-Slurry,
Crop Management
Urban Cook stove,
REDD+,
Agro-forestry,
Rural Cook stove
2.2 Priority sectors and sub-sector
for climate change mitigation (1/4)
 National GHG Inventory
GHG Emission By Sector
Total CO2eq
%
LUCF
23600.36
50.21
Agriculture
21113.40
44.92
Energy
2059.86
4.38
Waste
229.24
0.49
47002.85
100.00
Total
(Source: GHG Inventory report 2009)
2.2 Priority sectors and sub-sector
for climate change mitigation (2/4)
 Sector Rating Scheme
Sector
Economic
Priorities
GHG
Environmental
Reduction
Priorities
Potential
Social
Priorities
Total Benefit
Energy
5
4
4
5
18
LUCF
4
4
5
4
17
Agriculture
5
4
4
3
16
Waste
3
3
4
4
14
Industrial processes
4
3
2
3
12
Solvent and other
product use
3
2
2
2
9
Note: Rating Scheme: 0: no benefit, 1: faintly desirable, 2: fairly desirable, 3: moderately desirable,
4: very desirable, and 5: extremely desirable.
2.2 Priority sectors and sub-sector
for climate change mitigation (3/4)
 Sub-sector rating scheme
Sector &Subsector
Economic
Priorities
Environme
ntal
Priorities
Social
Priorities
GHG
Reduction
Potential
Total
Benefit
1. Energy
Energy Industries
5
3
5
5
18
Other sectors*
5
5
4
3
17
Transport
Manufacturing
industries and
construction
Other (please
specify)
4. Agriculture
Rice cultivation
Enteric fermentation
Agricultural soils
Manure
management
Field burning of
agricultural residues
Prescribed burning
of savannahs
Other (please
specify)
4
4
3
4
15
5
3
3
4
15
3
4
4
2
13
4
3
4
4
3
3
2
3
4
5
5
3
15
14
14
3
2
4
3
12
2
2
3
2
9
2
2
2
2
8
0
0
0
0
0
2.2 Priority sectors and sub-sector
for climate change mitigation (4/4)
 Sub-sector rating scheme
5. Land-use change and forestry
Forest and grassland
conversion
Changes in forest
and other woody
biomass stocks
Abandonment of
managed lands
Other (please
specify)**
CO2 emissions and
removals from soil
6. Waste
Other (Recycling,
composting, etc.)
Waste-water
handling
Solid waste disposal
on land
Waste incineration
5
4
4
5
18
4
4
5
4
17
4
4
4
4
16
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
3
4
4
14
3
3
3
3
12
3
2
3
3
11
2
2
3
3
10
3. Technology Analysis and
prioritization by using MCDA Model
Technology selection in transport sub-sectors- a result from MCDA Model
Costs
1 Hybrid Cars
2 Motor Vehicle Inspection
3 Electric scooters and Bicycles
4 City Transport Master Plan
5 Public city transport
4.5
18.8
22.8
23.2
30.1
GHG Mitigation Development
Total
benefits
1.5
15.9
1.6
14.8
3.2
16.2
2.8
14.9
3.9
20.6
21.8
35.2
42.1
40.8
54.6
 Prioritized technology base on development benefits
Transportation
Public city transport
30.1
3.9
20.6
54.6
Electric scooters and
Bicycles
Hybrid Cars
22.8
4.5
3.2
1.5
16.2
15.9
42.1
21.8
The first draft synthesis reports on TNA
for mitigation and adaptation have been
submitted for comments
 Next Step: 2nd National Consultation
- To explore further feedback on the draft synthesis
TNA report,
- To identify barriers and propose solution for each
identified technology and TAP
Sector
Sub-sector Technology
Energy Efficient Urban
Mass Transport
Vehicle Emission
Standards
Energy Efficient
Lighting
Energy Efficient
Appliances
…
Barriers
Propose
solution
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
4. Lessons learned
• The existing national climate change institution, where
adaptation and mitigation working groups are ready, is
relevant for TNA in Cambodia.
• SNC provides significant sources of mitigation
options/technologies a good base for TNA development
• MCDA model is good tool to prioritize potential
technologies, but it still needs practical exercise by local
experts
• There should have referent value, such as cost, GHG
mitigation, and the benefit of common typical
technologies to be available for reference.
• TNA shall contribute to the development of the to-beprepared National Strategy and Action Plan on Climate
Change, NAMA, etc.
Thank you very much
for your attention!