Saving the Ozone Layer
Download
Report
Transcript Saving the Ozone Layer
Science and global environmental politics
The Case of Stratospheric Ozone
Depletion
1
Science, Uncertainty & Risk
The authority of science
Uncertainty: incomplete information
Risk: probability of an undesirable event
Policy Qs
POL S 384 Lec 8
Modern notion of progress
“Knowledge is power”
Perceived neutrality, objectivity (fact/value)
Which risks to mitigate?
How to mitigate risk?
Who decides?
Risk assessment
Cost-benefit analysis
Probabilistic; money is the measure
Problems
Future vs. present; elitism; nonmonetary values; risk cultures
2
Risk Perception & (Ir)rationality
Representativeness: drawing analogies
Availability: over-rating highly publicized risks
Anchoring: people stick to old information
Overconfidence, denial of risk
Subjective factors
POL S 384 Lec 8
Autonomy: more risk-accepting when voluntary
Fairness: who causes & who bears risks?
Natural causes more acceptable than human-induced
3
Epistemic Communities
Groups of technical experts united by
consensual knowledge and common
policy goals
POL S 384 Lec 8
Transnational scope
Influential through state agencies, IOs, NGOs, media
Agenda-setting, fact finding, developing policy
options, implementation
Said to be influential in many treaties
Rational experts > international cooperation
4
Why science does not generate rational policy
Scientific consensus is rare
“Facts” must be interpreted
Scientists are rarely advocates
Much policy is not based on science
Risk of information overload
Scientific agenda is moral, political decision
What counts as knowledge?
POL S 384 Lec 8
“Other” knowledges
5
Precautionary Principle
Under threat to human health or environment,
precautions should be taken even without full
scientific proof of causality.
POL S 384 Lec 8
“ounce of prevention is worth pound of cure”
German “forecaring principle” (acid rain)
Embryonic principle of international law
Shifts burden of proof
Promotes foresight, humility, recognition of
interdependence
6
Ozone Depletion: Agenda Setting
CFCs: the “miracle compound”
Stratospheric ozone
POL S 384 Lec 8
Non-toxic, chemically inert, many uses
Few makers (DuPont is #1)
O3 absorbs UV-radiation, which causes
skin cancer, cataracts, phytoplankton death…
1974 discovery: CFCs destroy ozone
1978: U.S., Canada, Nordic aerosol ban
1977-85: fact-finding, little action
7
Science in the Ozone Negotiations
Vienna Convention (1985)
Antarctic ozone hole (1986)
Models predicted 7% ozone loss by 2050
Montreal Protocol (1987)
POL S 384 Lec 8
Not predicted by models
Cause unknown; CFCs suspected
Negotiators advised to ignore it
U.S. vs. E.U.; virtually no DC participation
IC’s to cut CFCs in half by 2000
DC’s can increase CFC use for 10 years
8
How did the ozone hole have an effect?
Not predicted by models, opened door to
knew way of framing the knowledge
Emerged when chlorine concentrations
reached 2 ppb
POL S 384 Lec 8
“Chlorine-loading” scheme
Stabilizing Cl required 85% reduction
U.S. position: 95% cutback
Montreal Protocol was not enough
9
Beyond Montreal
Amendments: 2/3 vote, majority of IC’s & DC’s
1988: New Science
Arctic “hole”
Antarctic hole linked to CFCs
Global ozone losses
1990s: CFC substitutes & Multilateral Fund
POL S 384 Lec 8
Binding on dissenters: sovereignty?
Necessity for DC participation
India & China to consume 1/3 CFCs by 2008
Grand bargain: participation for development aid
10
Amending Montreal
London, 1990: CFC phaseout by 2000
Copenhagen, 1992: phaseout by 1996
POL S 384 Lec 8
Phase out HCFCs by 2030
Bangkok, 1993: phase out methyl bromide
Montreal, 1997: ban MB by 2005 (IC’s)
Beijing, 1999: HCFC freeze @ 1989 levels
Plus carbon tetrachloride & methyl chloroform
Multilateral ozone fund ($1 B since)
IC’s ban by 2004; DC’s by 2016
Compliance, black market
11
Coming Attractions
POL S 384 Lec 8
2010 ~ Total phase-out of CFCs, halons and
carbon tetrachloride in developing countries.
2015 ~ Total phase-out of methyl chloroform and
methyl bromide in developing countries.
2030 ~ Total phase-out of HCFCs in developed
countries.
2040 ~ Total phase-out of HCFCs in developing
countries
12
Montreal Protocol Effectiveness
The shining example of green diplomacy
Ozone hole
Multilateral ozone fund
POL S 384 Lec 8
1986: 14 million km2
2006: 28 million km2
Chlorine loading near its peak
At least a decade before it begins to heal
Predicted to be normal mid-century
$2.2 billion, 1991-2007
Considered very effective
13
Relationship & contrast to climate change
Scientists increasingly outspoken
Small, concentrated industry vs. the glue of
the global economy
Science-led protocol amendment process
Norms of universal participation and
“common but differentiated responsibility”
POL S 384 Lec 8
Availability of profitable substitutes
U.S. demands “universal participation” on
climate change
14