State Pilot Project Using EDRS for H1N1 Surveillance

Download Report

Transcript State Pilot Project Using EDRS for H1N1 Surveillance

State Pilot Project Using the Electronic
Death Registration System for H1N1
Surveillance
Linette T Scott, MD, MPH
Deputy Director
Health Information and Strategic Planning
California Department of Public Health
June 9, 2010
NAPHSIS Annual Meeting 2010
Path Travelled
•
•
•
•
Background
Data Flow in California
Query Development
Other Issues and Next Steps
NAPHSIS Annual Meeting 2010
California Electronic Death Registration
System (EDRS)
• Electronic creation and registration of
Death Certificates, Amendments, and
Disposition Permits
• Went “live” January 2005
• By February 2010,
99.4% of Certificates created in EDRS
• ~ 240,000 – 250,000 deaths in California
annually
NAPHSIS Annual Meeting 2010
Cause of
Death fields
NAPHSIS Annual Meeting 2010
Value of EDRS Surveillance
• Identifies most serious cases for further
epidemiological investigation
• Complements other data sources
(e.g. Confidential Morbidity Reports, ED visits,
hospitalizations)
• Encompasses entire population,
not just a sample
• Minimum added resource cost—
uses data from existing system
NAPHSIS Annual Meeting 2010
Data Flow in California
GG note: Would say FH
transcribes information
NAPHSIS Annual Meeting 2010
Why wait until local registration?
• Quality Check: Local offices will contact
physicians if needed (e.g. Cause of Death is nonspecific)
• Prior to local registration, medical information
can be freely changed without documentation
• After local registration, certificate becomes a
legal document and further changes must be
done by filing an amendment
NAPHSIS Annual Meeting 2010
Free Text Surveillance
• Free text search: Cause of Death (COD)
entries from physician
• Done before ICD-10 coding for COD assigned
to Death Certificates
• Influenza disambiguation example:
– Haemophilus influenzae
– Parainfluenza
– Misspellings
NAPHSIS Annual Meeting 2010
Cautions of Preliminary Data
• Late Entries
• Pending Certificates
• Amendments
• Duplicate Entries
NAPHSIS Annual Meeting 2010
Average Processing Times
(YTD 2010)
• Date of Death to Local Registration
– EDRS (fully electronic): 6.1 days
– Non-EDRS: 4.5 days
• Date of Death to State Registration
– EDRS (fully electronic): 15.7 days
– Non-EDRS: 71.0 days
NAPHSIS Annual Meeting 2010
Processing Delays
• Biggest delays:
– Physician COD entry
– Physician signing of certificate
• Delays can also occur on the personal
information half of certificate
(e.g. clarifying family information)
• Can pull data prior to local registration but at
cost of decreased data quality
NAPHSIS Annual Meeting 2010
How to Improve?
Physician education:
• on importance of accurate COD entry
• on importance of timely COD entry and
signature
NAPHSIS Annual Meeting 2010
Steps to Develop Query
1. Obtain listing of confirmed cases
2. Look up cases in EDRS for COD
3. Select most common/promising COD text
strings and do test run
4. Of new results, how many are potential
new cases versus “noise”?
5. Refine query
NAPHSIS Annual Meeting 2010
Steps 1 & 2
• Confirmed case listing from
May to August 13, 2009
• 55 out of 107 cases had
“H1N1” or “Swine” or “Pandemic” in COD
• Others were non-specific
(“Influenza”, “Pneumonia”, “ARDS”)
• Spelling variants found:
“H1 N1” “H1-N1” “N1H1” etc
NAPHSIS Annual Meeting 2010
Steps 3-5
• Test queries run in same time frame in
EDRS
• “H1” “Swine” “Pandemic” brought up
21 additional deaths listed as H1N1
• “Pneumonia” “ARDS” brought up too
many non-specific results
(e.g. aspiration pneumonia, sequelae of
cancer)
NAPHSIS Annual Meeting 2010
Final Query Parameters
“H1” or “Swine” or “Pandemic”
anywhere in
COD fields (107A, 107B, 107C, 107D)
or Other Significant Conditions field (112)
NAPHSIS Annual Meeting 2010
EDRS Pull
• Unreported confirmed
case
• COD not confirmed
(“clinical diagnosis”)
N=21
Confirmed Cases
Case both in EDRS pull
and epidemiologyconfirmed
N = 55
• Search term not in
COD
• Delayed registration
or amendment
• Out of state death
N = 52
NAPHSIS Annual Meeting 2010
Other Issues & Next Steps
NAPHSIS Annual Meeting 2010
NAPHSIS Annual Meeting 2010
Media & Public
• EDRS deaths are not confirmed
• EDRS and epidemiology-confirmed numbers
will be different
• Media confusion regarding availability and
interpretation of source data
• Not part of Public Records Act
NAPHSIS Annual Meeting 2010
Other Uses
•
•
•
•
Seasonal influenza surveillance
Other infectious disease surveillance
Investigative resource (retrospective look)
Chronic diseases?
NAPHSIS Annual Meeting 2010
Lessons Learned
• EDRS surveillance is feasible and of
potential benefit
• Importance of partnering with programs
(i.e. Vital Records and Communicable
Disease Control)
• What is the program business need that
EDRS surveillance can fulfill?
NAPHSIS Annual Meeting 2010
Thank you!
Special thanks to:
• Dr. Scott Fujimoto (HISP)
• Dr. Glenna Gobar (U.C. Davis School of Medicine)
• Entire EDRS Staff
• Meileen Acosta and Division of Communicable Disease Control staff
NAPHSIS Annual Meeting 2010