Lithography - Chemical Engineering IIT Madras
Download
Report
Transcript Lithography - Chemical Engineering IIT Madras
Overview
Integration
Matching/ Accommodating different processes to obtain a ‘passing’
or good chip
Process Integration
Design/ Process Integration
Modifying the design (slightly), to suit the process
Usually, the electrical circuit is not altered
Assumes that process has been developed or optimized to the
maximum possible extent
Always remember that the cost /benefit is the ‘bottom line’
2
16-Jul-15
Index
Miscellaneous
Electro migration
Scaling in MOS
Electrical Structure (mostly FEOL)
BEOL Cu vs Al and Low-K vs Oxide
3
16-Jul-15
Electro migration
Due to movement of electrons, the atoms in a very small
line move
formation of voids, increase in electrical resistance, complete
breakdown
hillocks, whiskers ==> shorts
Minimum length needed “Blech Length” for a given
current density
Depends on the material
Copper, Gold good electromigration resistance
Reliability issue
4
16-Jul-15
Electro migration
Mean Time to Fail (MTF) depends on Current Density
E
(J)
1 kTa
MTF 2 e
J
Current Density few million Amp/sq cm
Grain size:
movement along grain boundaries faster
For very small lines, grain size = line width
if av grain size is 1 um, a 10 um line will fail quickly (for the same
current density, a 1 um line will fail later, a 0.5 um line may fail more
quickly)
also depends on arrangement and orientation of grain
5
16-Jul-15
Electro migration
Al is more prone to electromigration, however...
Cu does not form a stable strong oxide
Delamination from the liner is an issue
EM failures in copper likely to be in the interface, in Al,
in the bulk
Also, W has very high resistance to electromigration
Length of a path may not become very high
In Cu, (especially with dual damascene), for the same
design, length may become more
16-Jul-15
6
Reliability
regime (components of
poor quality)
Working life Regime
Wear Out regime
Fail/unit time
Infant Mortality
Arrhenius equation
Time
High Temp Operation Test - HTOT
Highly accelerated Stress Tests (HAST): - high humidity, high
temp
16-Jul-15
7
Different
mechanisms of fail may
have different activation
energies
==> Bimodal
Cumulative % Fails
Reliability
distribution of fails
Temp
Arrhenius equation is suitable for chemical reactions
Not always suitable for explaining physical failure mechanisms
8
16-Jul-15
Scaling
Scaling: If you reduce all the features (or some set of
parameters) by a constant factor, will the performance be
similar? Better? Worse?
Eg. Important dimensions are TOX, L, X
L
Gate
Source
Depletion Region
16-Jul-15
TOX
Drain
X
9
Scaling
Information from W. Maly: Atlas of IC Technologies
If all dimensions are reduced by 2 (for example)
CS0
CS
L/2
X/2
Gate
TOX/2
X/2
With same diffusion process, to obtain a shallower junction, need to start
with lower initial concentration
==> very high sheet resistance (shallow Jn, low dopant)
16-Jul-15
10
Scaling
If only some dimensions are scaled
eg. TOX and L, but not Junction depth
CS0
L/2
X
Gate
TOX/2
X
Depletion regions merge, short channel
11
16-Jul-15
Scaling
If dimensions are scaled and dopant concentration
“increased”
CS
CS0
L/2
X
X/2
Gate
TOX/2
X/2
Tolerable sheet resistance
==> High gradient of dopant in the Jn (hot electron effect) ==> LDD etc
12
16-Jul-15
Scaling
Constant Field :
Reduce a physical dimension by ‘k’ , then reduce
the voltage also by k
This reduces drain current, gate delay and gate-channel
capacitance by k
Number of circuits/ sq cm increases by k2
13
16-Jul-15
Scaling
Power per unit area remains constant
in CMOS. NMOS and Bipolar do not follow this
scaling rules ==> Issues
Power Delay product (PDP)
NOTE: Total power, not power per unit area:
Reduces by cubic
Practical Limitations by processes (eg. Litho resolution,
alignment, process marginalities)
14
16-Jul-15
Metal Gate
MOS: using metal gates:
Gate oxide etch/growth
N
N
N
N
Si
N
N
Source/Drain Diff and
oxide growth
16-Jul-15
Contact Etch
15
Metal Gate
Source Gate
N
N
Metal Dep
N
Drain
N
Metal Etch
Minimum Feature Size is 2l
Alignment tolerance l
Based on the above steps, only 5% of the area is used for transistor
channel
Overlap of gate to source and gate to drain ==> capacitance
16
16-Jul-15
Poly Gate
MOS: using poly gates:
Active Mask (STI for example)
Poly dep/etch/ implantation (self aligned)
Contact formation
--- Withstands high temp
Active channel area is about 12% of total area
lower capacitance
better channel definition
one more interconnect layer (poly)
17
16-Jul-15
Electrical Structures
Electrical Structures:
Resistor:
Poly (silicided) for low resistance and unsilicided
for high resistance
silicided: 5 to 10 ohm/square
unsilicided 300 to 500 ohm/square (depends on
dopant level and type)
undoped silicon (intrinsic) very high resistance, not
usually used
Can be ‘created’ during gate formation
16-Jul-15
18
Electrical Structures
Active (source/drain) areas can also be used for high resistance
Ohmic vs Schottky contact for lightly doped n structure
P type or highly doped N type
CAPACITOR:
MOS capacitor, similar to transistor
In the BEOL in some cases (Metal Insulator Metal Capacitor )
(Use Al for better thickness control)
Deep Trench capacitor (FEOL) for DRAM
19
16-Jul-15
Electrical Structures
INDUCTOR:
Metal ‘circle’
Inductance related to number of turns, radius etc
Parasitic resistance, capacitance
BEOL
Diode:
PN Junction diode
Schottky Diode
high reverse bias current
Many ‘slotted’ N+ in P well, with merging depletion
region, for good reverse bias current (appears as PN in
reverse, as Schottky in fwd)
20
16-Jul-15
FEOL Flow-I
Review
Sequence with more detail than what we saw before
Start with bulk P type silicon
Oxidize and strip (obtain clean surface)
Pad oxide and Nitride
Trench Lithography
Active (source drain) and gate area definition
CD measurement for example
Trench Etch
post etch CD measurement
etch bias
21
16-Jul-15
FEOL Flow-II
Trench Etch
blind etch
less than a micron depth
post etch CD measurement
etch bias
22
16-Jul-15
FEOL Flow-III
Trench oxidation (very small thickness)
TEOS Dep (0.5 micron for example, above active)+ Anneal
Reverse Active Mask: Litho, etch (about 0.5 micron)
To reduce the ‘load’ on STI CMP
load here means planarization load, NOT the removal
load
STI CMP
target 0.5 micron removal on small active (faster polish
area) for example
Other integration LOCOS
OR modification of STI by Poly Dep+CMP ....
Nitride Removal
16-Jul-15
23
FEOL Flow-IV
Pad oxide removal
Sacrificial oxidation (10 nm)
Nwell implant
Pwell implant
Gate Oxidation
Poly deposition (perhaps thin cap oxide for hard mask)
Gate Litho(use ARC)/ Etch
NMOS implant (LDD, Halo): Not the main implants
PMOS implant (LDD, Halo): Not the main implants
RTP
24
16-Jul-15
FEOL Flow-V
Spacer Formation
Nitride
Spacer etch
NMOS (main) implant
PMOS (main) implant
RTP
If you need unsilicided areas, you need to mask them with oxide/nitride
Pre-silicide clean (eg. Sputter the surface, or light chemical etch)
Co dep
Anneal (about a minute, 500 C)
Un-reacted Co removal
Nitride Dep (for contact etch)
25
16-Jul-15
FEOL / BEOL
BPSG Dep + Anneal + CMP (0.5 um thick remaining)
Cap Ox (to withstand W CMP in the next steps)
Contact photo + etch
Ti/TiN Liner dep (IMP Ti, CVD TiN)
W CVD
W CMP
ILD/PMD Oxide for Copper, Barrier Dep for Al
26
16-Jul-15
BEOL (Aluminum)
Barrier Dep (Ti/TiN)
Al Dep (PVD) + Ti/TiN
Al Photo + Etch (M1 levl)
Oxide Dep
Oxide CMP (blind)
Via12 etch and so on...
27
16-Jul-15
BEOL (Copper)
Oxide Dep
M1 photo + Etch
Liner (Ta/TaN) Dep
Cu (seed + electrochem) Dep
Cu CMP
Nitride (via etch stop layer) dep
Oxide Dep
V12-photo + etch (stop on nitride)
M2 photo + etch (blind) and so on...
OR M2 photo + blind etch followed by V12-photo+ stop on nitride
etch
16-Jul-15
28
BEOL (Copper)
Via first integration
Resist removal from the bottom of via can be an issue
Metal first integration
Resist pooling an issue
Some Other schemes:
Single damascene
Intermediate (stop on) nitride
increased cost, lower throughput
29
16-Jul-15
BEOL Integration
Some Issues:
Over etch: defectivity
under etch: opens
etch uniformity (center edge)
CMP
In Copper CMP, too much dishing/erosion ==> oxide
needs to be planarized
increased cost
30
16-Jul-15
Low -K
Oxide vs Low K
For RC delay reduction
Need
thermal stability
chemical inertness (selective etch)
mechanical strength (for Cu CMP)
adhesion to barrier
low stress
Thermal expansion matching
low diffusivity of contaminants (or copper)
31
16-Jul-15
Low -K
Only if k < 3, it is considered as ‘real low-k’
FSG (fluorinated silicate glass) (k=3.5)
not very low
absorbs water (can create HF and hence havoc)
Carbon Doped Silica (k = 3)
commercial: AMAT Black Diamond , NOVELUS Coral
uniform carbon doping is an issue
Organic polymers
low k, but soft (mechanical strength), temp stability, chemical
reactivity (photoresist etc)
thermal expansion mismatch ==> crack
32
16-Jul-15
Low -K
Organic polymers
low k, but soft (mechanical strength), temp stability, chemical
reactivity (photoresist etc)
thermal expansion mismatch ==> crack
low thermal conductivity ==> more stress on metal
Adhesion, Delamination
eg. PTFE adhesion, delamination during CMP
Absorbance of chemicals during process
and subsequent release
--> metal lines and transistors affected
DLC (diamond like carbon)
16-Jul-15
etch etc not tested
33
Low -K
Porous silica (or other materials)
Thermal, chemical stability is good
Diffusion of materials is high
Mechanical strength (CMP) may be an issue
Absorbance of chemicals an issue
Good thermal insulator ==> very high stress on metal
--> need to take heat conduction path in design
Repeatability (of process and material quality) etc need to be
tested
New material: Not tested very well yet
34
16-Jul-15
Low -K
CAP layer used to ‘increase’ mechanical strength
eg SiC. (Has high K, so only very thin films can be used)
DLC may also be used
35
16-Jul-15