Improving the Quality of Cancer Care Experience in England
Download
Report
Transcript Improving the Quality of Cancer Care Experience in England
Cancer: The story in England
Professor Mike Richards
National Cancer Director for England
International Workshop
London, UK, June 2007
Progress on Cancer in England: Overview
Where have we come from?
Where are we now?
What has brought about change?
Where next?
The Problem of Cancer in England in the 1990s
High incidence/mortality
Poor survival rates compared with Western Europe
(EUROCARE)
Inequalities (geographical and by social class)
Underfunding (staff and facilities)
Long waits
Fragmentation of services
All-cancers five-year survival index (%)
Patients diagnosed 1990-94, followed up to 1999
0
20
40
60
80
0
100
AUSTRIA
FRANCE
FRANCE
AUSTRIA
GERMANY
SWEDEN
SPAIN
SPAIN
SWITZERLAND
SWITZERLAND
NETHERLANDS
FINLAND
SWEDEN
NETHERLANDS
FINLAND
GERMANY
ITALY
ITALY
NO RWAY
NO RWAY
ENGLAND
DENMARK
SCO TLAND
ENGLAND
WALES
SCO TLAND
DENMARK
WALES
CZECH REP.
SLO VENIA
SLO VENIA
CZECH REP.
ESTO NIA
SLO VAKIA
SLO VAKIA
ESTO NIA
PO LAND
EURO PE
MEN
20
PO LAND
EURO PE
Nordic countries
South and West Europe
UK (England, Scotland, Wales)
Eastern Europe
Data covering less than 100% of country
40
60
80
100
WOMEN
Cancer in England: The Late 1990s
1995:
Calman–Hine Report
(Chief Medical Officers for England & Wales)
1996
1999:
: Improving Outcomes Guidance
Reports (breast, colorectal …)
Pace of change not fast enough.
Downing Street Summit
Cancer a ‘top priority’
NHS Cancer Plan 2000
First ever comprehensive strategy to
tackle cancer in England
(prevention palliative care)
Key targets and milestones
Commitments on investment, workforce,
facilities
Delivery mechanisms
Monitoring Progress on Cancer in England
The National Audit Office (which is
independent of government) conducted 3
reviews into progress on cancer in 2004/5
These reviews show that substantial
progress has been made, but more needs to
be done
Cancer : Progress on Outcomes
Cancer mortality falling
(15.7% in 8 years in people under 75)
Survival rates improving across a wide range of
cancers
Experience of care has improved between 2000
and 2004 (surveys conducted by the Department
of Health and the National Audit Office)
Progress on Cancer Service Organisation
Services have changed radically
Around 1500 multidisciplinary teams in
England
Cancer networks are bringing primary,
secondary and tertiary sectors together
Services for complex surgery are being
reconfigured
Peer review appraisal of services against
national standards is underway
Progress on NHS Cancer Plan Commitments (1)
Smoking prevalence is falling
Breast screening has been extended
Bowel screening has started
Waiting time targets have been achieved
Use of new anticancer treatments is
increasing rapidly
Accrual of patients into clinical research
trials has tripled
Progress on NHS Cancer Plan Commitments (2)
Additional investment has been
made in cancer and palliative care
The cancer workforce has expanded
New facilities have been installed
What has brought about change?
Multiple factors:
1. Consistent political priority and profile
2. Having a clear direction of travel (Cancer Plan and
NICE guidance)
3. Investment: funding, staff, equipment, drugs
4. National oversight of implementation
Cancer Programme Board
National Cancer Team
5. Local cancer networks
6. Internal and external monitoring of progress (e.g.
National Audit Office)
National oversight of implementation
Cancer Programme Board
National Cancer Team
Cancer screening coordination
Support for providers: service redesign (QI)
Peer review appraisal programme (QA)
Network development
Support for commissioners (e.g. guidance on
PET/CT; brachytherapy etc.)
NICE guidance implementation
Cancer registry coordination
Local Cancer Networks
Typically serve populations of 1.5-2.0 million
Partnership organisations
Service planning
Clinical engagement
Action Plans with milestones
Delivering change: The example of
cancer waiting times
2 Key targets set in 2000 to be achieved by 2005
31 day: Diagnosis (decision to treat)
to first treatment:
(98% operational standard)
62 day: Urgent referral to first treatment:
(95% operational standard)
Progress on Cancer Waits: 2000 - 2004
Development of infrastructure
Cancer Services Collaborative
Cancer waiting times database
Workforce expansion
But: Little or no progress on delivery
e.g. only 70% achievement of 62 day target
for tumours other than breast cancer
Progress on Cancer Waits 2005-2006 (1)
National Cancer Waits Project established
Problems identified
Lack of profile
Lack of local ownership
Lack of clinical engagement
Poor measurement
Lack of proactive pathway management
Specific blockages (e.g. endoscopy;
radiotherapy)
Poor communication between Trusts
Progress on 62 day target
Monthly 62 Day Performance
(Monthly CWT-Db provider based statistics)
100.0%
95.0%
85.0%
80.0%
75.0%
Month
Performance-All Providers
Threshold
Jul-06
Jun-06
May-06
Apr-06
Mar-06
Feb-06
Jan-06
Dec-05
Nov-05
Oct-05
Sep-05
Aug-05
Jul-05
Jun-05
70.0%
May-05
% Performance
90.0%
Progress on Cancer Waiting Times 2005-2006
How has this been achieved?
High national profile
Local leadership: focus and grip
Improved data collection: weekly PTL
Service redesign: Cancer Services Collaborative
Navigators / coordinators within Trusts
Intensive Support Team working with
“challenged” Trusts
Rigorous Performance Management
Cancer in England: where next?
New challenges
Rising incidence of cancer (ageing population)
Obesity epidemic
Rising expectations in society
Limited finances
Manifesto commitments
Changing NHS
New opportunities
New technologies
New treatments
Cancer Reform Strategy, 2007
Cancer in England: Summary
We have undoubtedly made progress over
the past 5-10 years
We still have more to do to achieve our
stated aim of being amongst the best in
Europe
There are multiple new challenges to be
faced