Organism Life Histories
Download
Report
Transcript Organism Life Histories
Organism
Life Histories
BIOL400
9 November 2015
Energy Allocation
An
organism assimilates a finite amount of
energy, which it can devote to:
Growth
Reproduction
Tissue maintenance
Storage for later (see above)
Fitness
Measure
of survival likelihood and
reproductive output
Natural selection, based on the physical
and biotic environment, determines the life
history a species has
The one that maximizes fitness
Fig. 2.8 p. 25
Selection for
optimum
clutch size of
11 in blue
tits
Fig. 2.9 p. 25
Experimental
demonstration
that selection
has not
optimized
clutch size in
the house wren
(unless there is
a life-history
trade-off…)
Key Life-History Attributes
Growth
rate
Age at maturity
Size at maturity
Reproductive frequency
Annual
Lifetime
Fecundity
Propagule
size
Life-History Trade-Offs
Stearns:
“Linkages between traits that
constrain the simultaneous evolution of
two or more traits”
Increased allocation toward A decreases
possible allocation toward B
Present Reproduction vs.
Survival and
Future Reproduction
Present Reproduction vs.
Survival and
Future Reproduction
House wren??
Red deer
Kenyan Lobelia
Beech trees
Fig. 2.9 p. 25
Fig. 8.20 p. 137
Fig. 8.19 p. 136
HANDOUT
Maturation age vs. fecundity
and/or propagule size
and survival
HANDOUT
Egg Size vs. Clutch Size
Trade-off
may select for point at which
increasing clutch size leads to lower
fitness by reducing offspring size, and
increasing offspring size leads to lower
fitness by reducing clutch size
Hence, an optimal egg size
Optimal Egg Size
Vs.
Anatomical Constraints on Egg Size
If
selection optimizes egg size, egg size
should not correlate with female body size
However, anatomical contraints may
cause eggs of small females to be smaller
than optimum
Egg size increases with female body size
HANDOUT
Congdon and Gibbons 1987
HANDOUT—Doughty 1997
Human Menopause
Trading
off future reproduction and its
increased risks against helping of
grandchildren?
Life-History
Invariants
Life-History Invariants
Invariant
…
…ratios (“dimensionless numbers”)
…X-Y relationships with set slopes
Demonstrate
trade-offs
the nature of life-history
HANDOUTS—Charnov 1993
Genotype and Phenotype
Is
variation in life history…
…genetic (induced by DNA)?
…phenotypic (induced by environment)?
Fig. 6.11 p. 91
Yarrow
Common-garden experiments demonstrate genotypic
effect—adaptation to local conditions?
All grown in identical greenhouse conditions
Reaction Norm
Stearns’
definition: "The mapping of the
genotype onto the phenotype as a function
of the environment—expressed as a plot
of phenotypic values [Y] against
environmental values [X]. The reaction
norm of a genotype is the full set of
phenotypes that the genotype will express
in interaction with the full set of
environments in which it can survive."
Countergradient Variation
Seemingly
good evidence that much of the
variation in organism life histories must be
genetic and adaptive
Genetic basis verified in common-garden
laboratory experiments
HANDOUT—Conover and Present 1990
Categorizing
Life-History
Strategies
r- and K-selection
Pianka
(1970)
Name denotes r and K in logistic growth
equation
• r is intrinsic rate of increase
• K is karrying kapacity
Table 10.2 p. 180
Fig. 10.20 p. 181
Grimes (1979)
Ruderal, competitive, and tolerant plant life
histories
Salisbury (1942)
The
Reproductive Capacity of Plants
Anticipated the r-selection/K-selection
dichotomy in plants, measuring the mass
in mg of various plants' seeds:
Open habitats:
120 mg
Semi-closed:
220 mg
Meadows:
490 mg
Wood margins:
440 mg
Shaded habitats: 1400 mg
Fig. 10.21 p. 182
Larger seeds
have higher
survival rates
Bet Hedging
Some
species spread reproductive effort
over long lifespan
May have unpredictably variable juvenile
mortality that is often high
Hence no advantage to investing heavily
in reproduction in any year—trade reduced
reproductive effort off against increased
adult survival
Opposite of “big bang” reproducers
p. 138
Bet hedgers in lower left
Big-bang reproducers in upper right