Another Perfect Storm - USC Gould School of Law
Download
Report
Transcript Another Perfect Storm - USC Gould School of Law
Another Perfect Storm
Factors Contributing to the OverValuation of Medications as a
Treatment for Psychiatric
Disorders
Attribution Theory
Attributions are explanations of the
cause(s) for events
Causes may be internal or external,
enduring or unstable
People preferentially interpret events in a
manner that maintains a positive selfimage
Attributions may lead to cognitive
distortions
Attribution in Psychiatry
Diagnosis and treatment
recommendations
Assessment of treatment response
Perceived efficacy of various
treatment modalities
Data Regarding the Efficacy
of Antipsychotic Medications
Levine et.al. (2011): During CATIE study,
only 11.7% of subjects attained and
maintained remission of at least 6 months;
55.5% experienced no period of symptom
remission.
Levine et.al. (2012): During the CATIE
study, only 18.9% of subjects were
treatment “responders” by trajectory
analysis.
Data Regarding the Efficacy
of Antipsychotic Medications
Poor outcomes for vocational
recovery and quality of life indicators.
Outcomes for treatment of first onset
schizophrenia in programs utilizing
little or no psychotropic medications
were equivalent or better than
conventional treatment with
medications.
Risks Associated with
Antipsychotic Medications
Metabolic complications including diabetes,
metabolic syndrome, and resulting
cardiovascular disease have been
implicated in the declining life expectancy
of individuals having psychiatric disabilities.
NASMHPD (2006): life expectancy for
individuals having psychiatric disabilities is
25 years below the average in the United
States
Risks Associated with
Antipsychotic Medications
Serious, and sometimes lifethreatening adverse effects, such as
seizures, hyperthermia, osteoporosis,
hypothyroidism, breast cancer,
suicidality, cardiac arrhythmias, and
tardive dyskinesia are not uncommon.
A Balanced View of
Psychotropic Medications
Very beneficial to a relatively small percentage of
individuals
Partial benefit to some individuals
Risk for very serious and potentially lifethreatening adverse effects
May produce no therapeutic effect or even
paradoxical worsening of various conditions
Effects of psychotropic medications are highly
individualized
No useful tools to predict treatment response
Prescription Drug Utilization
The U.S. Centers for Disease Control
report on prescription drug utilization in
2007-2008
Stimulant medications were the most
commonly used prescription drugs in the
12-19 year age range
Antidepressant medications were the most
commonly used prescription medications
among adults ages 20-59
Conclusion:
Factors that are unrelated to
scientific inquiry and empirical
evidence are powerfully driving
perceptions of psychotropic
medications that exaggerate their
efficacy and their legitimacy as a
preferred therapeutic tool.
Historical Context
Commercial synthesis and marketing
of PCN in 1945
Chlorpromazine, marketed in the US
in 1950 as Thorazine
Diazepam marketed in 1963
Fluoxetine (Prozac), released in 1987
Historical Context
Dramatic achievements in medical
science
public optimism
passivity concerning health issues
Psychopharmacology helped
“medical-ize” psychiatry
Family members of psychiatric
consumers
Psychological Motivations
Obtaining a diagnosis and prescribing
a medication relieves feelings of
powerlessness.
Prevent harm
Intervention during crisis must be
incisive, targeted, and therapeutic
Exaggeration of the efficacy of the
prescribed medication is reassuring
Psychological Motivations
Motivation for psychiatrists to inflate
their perception of psychotropic
medication as a therapeutic tool
External pressures to have definitive
answers
Wish to have recognition for expertise
Wish to preserve credibility
Pharmaceutical Marketing
Physicians tend to perceive
themselves as neutral with respect to
marketing strategies, but numerous
studies continue to show that
pharmaceutical sales representatives
have a major impact upon prescribing
patterns, often to the detriment of
quality of care.
Pharmaceutical Marketing
Gift cycle
Befriend and betray
Obfuscation of marketing intent with
“educational opportunities”
Visual images to imply benefits and
indications that are not substantiated by
research
Solicitation to participate in false studies
Publication planning
Direct to consumer marketing
Pharmaceutical Marketing
True extent of contamination of medical
science and medical care by
pharmaceutical marketing is staggering.
Lobbying
Insertion into the political economy
Impact upon regulatory policy
Dilution of the medical literature
Impact on day to day practice of psychiatry
Promotion of new, unsubstantiated diagnoses
Under-representation of risk
Undermining of treatment alternatives
Promotion of self-diagnosis and aggressive consumerism
Academia
Funding for research
Publishing
Positive reporting bias in journals
Ghost writing
Program development
Personal financial gain
Shapes medical education and
imparts significance to pharmacology
Other Financial Considerations
Third party payers
Medications impact length of stay in
hospitalization
A central criterion for continued payment
for inpatient treatment is on-going
adjustment of medications
Cost savings when primary care
physicians treat with meds rather than
referring for mental health services
Consumers
Acculturation to a passive recipient
role in treatment
Easier to have a chemical imbalance
than to confront life’s problems,
change lifestyle
Quick fix
Faith in Western medical science
Regulatory Considerations
Relatively permissive criteria for approval
of medications and new indications for
medications
FDA approval is translated by most
professionals and consumers to mean that
the drug is safe and effective
Loopholes to regulations that would
support more transparent disclosure
Medical journals.
The Perfect Storm:
Implications
Clinical practice
Outpatient commitment for
medications
Drug courts
Medication of children, especially
those in public custody