Misleading Marketing
Download
Report
Transcript Misleading Marketing
Welcome to class of
Misleading Marketing
in Emerging Markets
Dr. Satyendra Singh
University of Winnipeg
Canada
www.uwinnipeg.ca/~ssingh5
Negligent
Consumer
Behaviour
Misleading
Marketing
Negligent Consumer Behavior
• This behavior may negatively affect the longterm quality of life of individuals and society
• This behavior can occur in 2 contexts
– Product misuse
– Consumption of hazardous products
Product Misuse
• Injuries result
from misuse of a safe
product not from product defects
• Using cell phone while driving outlaw
• So, the most dangerous component is the
consumer no way to recall them
Consumption of Hazardous Products
• USA, 1988-1998, alcohol related accidents ↓ by ↑
consumer awareness
–
–
–
–
Informing and education
Social controls
Economic incentives
Economic disincentives
• In EM, trend is unknown appears ↑
Misleading Marketing
• Telemarketing fraud
– Elderly are vulnerable to fraud by telemarketers
• Advertising to children
– Criticism of advertising directed at children
– Ban advertising to children under 12
• Deceptive advertising
– Verification of claims
– Particularly important in EM
Characteristics of Consumers in EM
• ↓ Literacy
• ↓ Education
– Neither compulsory nor readily available
•
•
•
•
•
•
↓ Access to legal remedies BBB
Unaware of legal rights
Rural communities
↓ Freedom of expression
↓ Access to media
Therefore need for control Economics of
Information Model to judge veracity of claims
Economics of Information Model…
• Search claim
– Brand X margarine comes in a convenient plastic tub
– This claim can be evaluated before the purchase
– If learned, distrust advertiser in future advertisements
– Advertiser has ↑ incentive to avoid false search claims
– Thus little concern to us
Economics of Information Model…
• Experience claim
– Brand X margarine tastes just like butter
– Can only be discovered through use of the product
– 1st time might be deceived no same mistake twice
– Advertisers depend on repeat purchase to recover
– investments on their advertisements little concern to us
#
Economics of Information Model…
• Credence claim
– Brand X margarine contains 0 % cholesterol
– Cannot check the claim even after use of the product
– Requires chemical testing
– Average customer does not have this resource
– Customer must consult other source of information
• e.g., magazine to discover if the claim is false
– Major concern to us!
Economics of Information Model
• Take another example Brand Y tastes best
– Extremely difficult to verify the claim
cannot find all brands
so you’d think consumers would not place credence on such
advertising
But they do because, repeat sales justify credence (and cost of
advertising)
product must be performing satisfactory
So there must be some truth in the claim
depends on interpretation
Interpret these advertisements...
Interpret these advertisements
Interpret these advertisements
Claim Interpretation Issue
• Literal claim
– Direct most of us agree on its interpretation
• Implied claim different interpretation to different people
– Brand X is the only margarine with 0% cholesterol
– Brand X is a suitable food for those concerned about heart disease
– Brand X is better than butter for those concerned about heart disease
Claim Interpretation Issue
• TV 30-second advt. addresses large audience
• Do not know who will interpret how to be misled
• n-% issue what proportion of the audience must draw a
false inference before the advertisement may be defined as
misleading. n for USA = 15-25%, n for EM = ?
• To test claim, 2 criteria: Credibility and Verifiability
Schechter’s Approach to Evaluating Claims
• Credibility: Prominence of advertiser ↑ if ad appeared on network TV,
magazine of ↑ circulation
• Verifiability: ↑ Could be evaluated within a month of purchase
Verifiability
HI
Misleading, if n > 50%
Misleading, if n > 25% standard
Misleading if n > 25% standard
Misleading, if n > 5%
LO
LO
Credibility
HI
Seriousness of injury for being misled: medicine vs. chocolate
Seriousness of injury for being misled