Transcript irriis

“Systematic Experimentation and
Demonstration activities”
IRRIIS AB Meeting
Ottobrunn, 20th May 2008
Sandro Bologna
ENEA
IRRIIS - FP6-2005–IST-4
EC - LOGO
Control Room with MIT WorkStation
LCCI 1
Control Room
MIT WorkStation
MIT WorkStation
Control Room
LCCI 2
IRRIIS
MIT integration with existing SCADA systems
IRRIIS
IRRIIS Inter-LCCI Communication Highway
LCCI 2
LCCI 1
MIT integration with existing SCADA
systems
IRRIIS
Goals of experimentation and
demonstration activities
1.
Experimentation of SimCIP simulation environment (without MIT) to:
o
verify the implemented LCCI models and capabilities to
implement different scenarios,
o
identify the set of potential risk situations that could benefit
from MIT, to be used for the activities of scenarios set-up
2.
Experimentation of MIT system using SimCIP environment with the
objectives to verify and evaluate the risk reduction effects
3.
Demonstrate the results of points 1) and 2) to the stakeholders in
order to have their evaluations and feedbacks
IRRIIS
Experimentations
IRRIIS
Experimentation strategy (Step 1)
NO
ATTACKS/
FAULTS
Test-Bed
SimCIP
Normal
behaviours
COMPARE
BEHAVIOURS
WITHOUT MIT
Build an
experimentation
infrastructure
Simulation
Environment
Knowledge elicitation
about a set of scenarios
ATTACKS/FAULTS
EVENTS TREE
Test-Bed
SimCIP
Attack/fault
behaviours
Attack/faults
scenario
tables
IRRIIS
Experimentation strategy (Step 2)
MIT Communication
Add-on #1
Add-on #2
Add-on #n
Test-Bed
SimCIP
Normal
behaviours
COMPARE
BEHAVIOURS &
EFFECTS
WITH MIT
Build an
experimentation
infrastructure
Simulation
Environment
Knowledge elicitation
about a set of scenarios
ATTACKS/FAULTS
EVENTS TREE
Test-Bed
SimCIP
Attack/fault
behaviours
Attack/faults
scenario
tables
IRRIIS
Experimentation environment architecture
IRRIIS
Physical set-up of the experimentation environment
Electricity
Simulator
Electrical
SCADA Emulator
Telecom
SCADA Emulator
Telecom
Simulator
LCCI Telecom
Data Base
LCCI Electricity
Data Base
Optional External Components
SimCIP
Electricity MIT Add-on
MITcommunication
Electrical Control Room
Telecom MIT Add-on
IRRIIS
Telecom Control Room
LCCIs for
experimentation
P  Power (electrical) network
PT  Power Telecom network
(SCADA systems
including also telecom
network owned by Power
Network Operator)
T  Telecom network
(Telecom Infrastructure)
TP  Telecom Power network
(Telecom backup power
systems)
LCCI Owner
Power Telco
Carrier Carrier
Primary
LCCI
Supporting
CI
P
T
PT
TP
LCCIs INVOLVED IN
THE ROME MINI
TELCO BLACK-OUT
IRRIIS
Simulating different LCCIs components
within SimCIP+SinCAL
P – Power Network
Simulation
TP –Telco Power
Network
Simulation
PT – Power
Telecom
Network
Simulation
Scenario
Table
T – Telecom
Network
Simulation
(SCADA)
IRRIIS
Using scenario tables to define different
scenario event sequences
P – Power Network
Simulation
TP –Telco Power
Network
Simulation
PT – Power
Telecom
Network
Simulation
Scenario
Table
T – Telecom
Network
Simulation
(SCADA)
IRRIIS
Scenarios coverage strategy
P
PT
T
TP
(primary
fault)
(primary
fault)
(primary
fault)
(primary
fault)
P+PT
P+T
P+TP
PT+P
PT+T
(faults)
(faults)
(faults)
(faults)
(faults)
Scenario
Table 1
………
………
………
Scenario
Table 2
………
………
………
Scenario
Table n
………
………
………
ADDITIONAL “ENVIRONMENTAL” CONDITIONS
IRRIIS
Scenarios execution and evaluation
MIT Communication
TEFS
RE
IKA
CRIPS
Selecting
Scenario
Tables
………
………
………
course of scenario
t0
Compiling
ti
ti
ti
te
t0 = start of scenario
te = end of scenario
i = 1...n risky situations
ti = snapshot of risky situation
Logs of the events
IRRIIS
Evaluating the expected results
Verify results
Expected
results tables
Scenario
tables
Iterative
improvements
MIT Components
TEFS
RE
IKA
Scenario 1
MIT Behavior 1
Detection t1
Local info t2
Remote Info t3
………
CRIPS
Event 1
Event 2
Event 3
………
T
P
PT
TP
Knowledge from analysts/experts
IRRIIS
Experimentation steps for RE
RE Knowledge Base
General
rules
Specific
rules
Services
Updating rules &
services/processes relations
Knowledge from
analysts/experts
Scenario 1
Scenario 1
Detection t1
Local info t2
Remote Info t3
………
MIT Behavior 1
Event 1
Event 2
Event 3
………
First
experimental step
Processes
System ready for
demonstration to
stakeholders
1 table fails
2 tables fail
MIT Behavior 1
relations
Detection t1
Local info t2
Remote Info t3
………
Event 1
Event 2
Event 3
………
Second
experimental step
All tables ok
Scenario 1
MIT Behavior 1
Detection t1
Local info t2
Remote Info t3
………
Event 1
Event 2
Event 3
………
Final
experimental step
IRRIIS
Status of experiments with SimCIP & SinCAL
Networks already modeled:
P – Network:
The chosen P network is the part of the Rome High Voltage (150 kv)
distribution network controlled by the OSTIENSE ACEA control Centre.
Three Medium Voltage (20 kv) distribution networks, connected to
couples of HV primary substations are also considered.
SSinCAL
Iinstallation
PT – Network:
The Power Telco network (with simple/reduced SCADA functionality)
associated to the previous P network is implemented.
SSimCIP
Iinstallation
TP - Network:
The back-up systems of one backbone (BoB) node, two additional
Transit nodes and some local nodes were considered as a part of TP
network. As described below at this stage only the backup batteries
and not the Diesel generators are considered.
T – Network
Not yet modelled at this stage
IRRIIS
SSinCAL load-flow model installation
tthree electrical
power production
points
IRRIIS
SSinCAL load-flow model installation
Tthree electrical
services
consuming areas
Oone serving a
“BoB” Telecom
node
Ttwo serving
“Transit” Telecom
dodes
IRRIIS
SSimCIP PT and TP implemented models
PT - AGENTS
VOLTAGE BUSBAR MONITORS
POWER-FLOW LINES MONITORS
SWITCHING LINES ACTUATORS
LOAD CHARGING ACTUATORS
TP - AGENTS
BUILDING SERVICES (Batteries, ect.)
TELCO DEVICES POWER INTERFACES
BoB devices
Transit devices
Local devices
IRRIIS
P- Network starting events
These events may be classified into more types:
FIRST TYPE (proposed by Siemens)
Loss of power service supply (caused by line overloading) from one (or more)
of the three in-feeder points.
Consequences. strong under voltage condition having impact on all the three
considered distribution 20 Kv areas with high risk of a generalised black out
and loss of the power services to Telecom buildings.
Expected mitigation: possibility to negotiate load shedding policies inside
areas that are less critical for Telecom LCCI.
First implemented
scenario table
IRRIIS
P- Network starting events
SECOND TYPE EVENTS
Loss of power service supply (caused by a short circuit) form one or more of
the primary substations serving one of the three distribution areas, together
with a not usual load request from an important consumer in such area.
Consequences. Under voltage condition mainly concentrated on the
specific affected area.
Expected mitigation: Early warning of possible black out involving the
specific affected area and negotiation of the restoration time in case of
outage.
Implemented scenario
table
Table under
development
IRRIIS
TP- Network starting events
TYPE OF EVENT (Events are similar to the real Torpagnotta scenario)
Degradation of the BoB or Transit Telco devices functionalities, caused by a
flooding inside Telco buildings. Consequently some parts of the PT network
become inoperable.
Consequences. Additional faults events on the P network (like under
voltage or overloading conditions) cannot be monitored/managed by
operators (and by MIT components too.)
Expected mitigation: Such type of “information system black-outs” risks
must be diagnosed early and communicated between LCCIs. In such way
on field preventive measures may be undertaken
Implemented scenario
table
Table under
development
IRRIIS
First results from experimentation and
demonstration activities
1.
Experimentation of SimCIP simulation environment (without MIT) to
o
verify the implemented LCCI models and capabilities to implement different scenarios,
o
identify the set of potential risk situations that could benefit from MIT, to be used for the activities of scenario setup
1A. A first version of PT and TP models are correctly implemented, a first
scenario table is running, additional scenarios are under development
1B A first set of potential risk situations are identified only for faults arising
from the P network. SimCIP T models are under implementation
2.
Experimentation of MIT system using SimCIP environment with the objectives to verify and evaluate the risk reduction
effects
2. Not started yet
3.
Demonstrate the results of points 1) and 2) to the stakeholders in order to have their evaluations and feedbacks
3. Not started yet. Improvements of SimCIP models ad scenarios (1A) are
needed, and some experiments with MIT (2) have to be configured and
executed.
IRRIIS
Demonstrations
IRRIIS
The demostrations





Purpose:
- demonstrate MIT concepts/components to interested
LCCI-stakeholders using the SimCIP environment
Objective:
- convince LCCI stakeholders that MIT components
have a benefit for them (e.g. help to avoid or
mitigate cascading effects leading to black-outs)
Procedure:
- demonstrate the successfully executed IRRIIS experiments
Organisation:
- scenario-based demo with active LCCI-stakeholder involvement
3 public demonstration events (Germany, Italy, Spain)
IRRIIS
Schedule for Demonstration Events
Month*
Host
Oct/Nov
2008
1st Demonstration
IABG
event in Germany
Spring
2009
2nd Demonstration
ENEA
event in Italy
Spring
2009
AIA
or
REE
Name
3rd Demonstration
event in Spain
* preliminary dates
depending on
project progress
IRRIIS
Prerequisites and Tasks
Prerequisites
Tasks
Demonstrations (WP4.1)
Invitation
Setting
Materials
Feedback
PoC Acquisition
PoC* Invitation
Announcements
Rooms
Tech Setup
Social Event
Flyer
Handouts
Presentations
Questionnaire
Deliverables
Evaluation
Selected Experiments
Experiments
Experimentations (WP3.5)
SimCIP
MITs
SINCAL
Integration, test and validation
of MIT components (WP3.4)
* Point of Contact
Framework
Whom
What
How
Tec
Basis
IRRIIS
Demonstration Visualisation
Example Demonstration Projection Screen
CI-Viewer
MIT
SimCIP
Sincal
Time Synchronous
Presentation of
SimCIP and MITs on
multiple Screens
Audience
IRRIIS
IRRIIS
CI Status Visualisation
IRRIIS
Comparison & Evaluation of Effects
• No. of inhabitants and density of population
City Model of Rome
• Supply areas of ACEA
Viterbo
Rieti
Roma
 Number of affected households
 Amount of lost energy in MWh
Frosinone
 Duration of the outage
Latina
IRRIIS