VectaStar Vision 2008 - Cambridge Broadband Networks – VectaStar.

Download Report

Transcript VectaStar Vision 2008 - Cambridge Broadband Networks – VectaStar.

Point to Multi-Point microwave backhaul in Next
Generation mobile backhaul networks
TNMO London
May 2010
Slide 1
The Company
Headquarters in Cambridge UK
Market-driven, world class technology
Research and product design in
Cambridge
Manufacture by Benchmark
Largest carrier-class PMP vendor, fourfold increase in sales 2007 to 2009
More than 50 customers in 35 countries
First Backhaul vendor sponsor to join
NGMN Alliance
In Confidence
Cambridge Broadband Networks Ltd.
Slide 2
Agenda
Evaluating last-mile
backhaul alternatives for
European Operators
What are the cost
implications
PMP Backhaul
Considerations for next
generation networks
Conclusions
In Confidence
Cambridge Broadband Networks Ltd.
Slide 3
The backhaul crunch
Speed is key:
Coverage
ubiquitous
Unlimited Data
Plans
Backhaul
Crunch
New app’s fuelled
by multiple open
operating systems
Smartphone
ownership
growing rapidly
Next Generation Mobile Broadband networks also need to make money
In Confidence
Cambridge Broadband Networks Ltd.
Slide 4
The wall of mobile data
2020:
50 Billion
mobile
connections
2015:
2010:
4.6 Billion
Mobile
Subscribers
Source: Nokia
7 Billion
Mobile
Subscribers
•Smartphones and
Dongles are just the
beginning
•Machine-to-machine
communications will
change dynamics of
mobile
In Confidence
Cambridge Broadband Networks Ltd.
Slide 5
Key Factors in Backhaul Deployment
• Must be enough for
Backhaul
Requirements of
today and
tomorrow – with an
established
capacity roadmap
System
Capacity
System
Operational
Cost
Speed to
Deploy
System
Capital
Cost
• Equipment needs to
provide services in a
few hour, not weeks or
months – with minimal
planning and licensing
• Drive down ever
increasing
antenna lease
and spectrum
costs along with
radio equipment
site costs
• Equipment plus
Installation must
meet market
targets
In Confidence
Cambridge Broadband Networks Ltd.
Slide 6
Evaluating last mile backhaul for European Operators
WHAT ARE THE OPTIONS?
In Confidence
Cambridge Broadband Networks Ltd.
Slide 7
Last Mile Backhaul Options
Western European Operators – Grading Of Principle Backhaul Options
Grading 1-5 where 1 is very poor and 5 is excellent
Source: Informa Telecoms & Media
In Confidence
Cambridge Broadband Networks Ltd.
Slide 8
Cost comparison: various backhaul technologies
Source: Informa Telecoms & Media
•Forecast cost to transport data traffic: as traffic increases, the need to build or
upgrade backhaul increases
•Voice traffic is assumed to be carried on E1
•Cost increases towards the end of the forecast period due to volume of traffic
•Deployed Fibre is second most expensive but is a long term option for some operators
•Microwave technologies are the most cost efficient
In Confidence
Cambridge Broadband Networks Ltd.
Slide 9
A balanced backhaul solution
PMP has the lowest
microwave OPEX
PMP has the
lowest CAPEX
Informa Telecoms and Media: “Last Mile Backhaul Options for
West European Mobile Operators”
In Confidence
Cambridge Broadband Networks Ltd.
Slide 10
Evaluating last mile backhaul for European Operators
WHAT ARE THE COST
IMPLICATIONS?
In Confidence
Cambridge Broadband Networks Ltd.
Slide 11
Mobile operators want backhaul solutions
that cost less,
deliver higher performance
and reduce the complexity of
their networks
In Confidence
Cambridge Broadband Networks Ltd.
Slide 12
Cost comparison: Tier-1 UK Operator
• Cost comparison (Europe)
between PMP and the other
two prominent technologies,
PTP and hybrid fibre (leasing)
• Although both leasing fibre
and hybrid backhaul
technologies are considered
cost-efficient, analysis shows
that PMP can provide better
cost savings in backhaul, even
compared to the widely
established PTP microwave in
Western Europe.
The analysis presented has been undertaken for an international Tier-1 operator
running a mobile broadband network in the UK. Calculations are for a 5-year period.
• Cost savings of PMP compared with TDM/fibre leasing for the total cost to transfer traffic
amounts to US$497 million per year during 2010, increasing to US$2.8 billion per year for 2014
• PMP is expected to offer cost savings of US$26 million during 2010 and this will increase to
US$248 million during 2014 compared to PTP microwave.
Source: Informa Telecoms & Media
In Confidence
Cambridge Broadband Networks Ltd.
Slide 13
PMP Microwave Backhaul
IS THERE A ANOTHER WAY?
In Confidence
Cambridge Broadband Networks Ltd.
Slide 14
PMP Microwave Architecture
Point-to-point
Point-to-MultiPoint
Single Hop = predictable latency
Access
point
PtP uses 1 frequency, 2 radios
and requires 2 installations per
link
In Confidence
Cambridge Broadband Networks Ltd.
PMP uses 1 frequency per sector. To
backhaul 9 cell sites, VectaStar uses
8 fewer radios:10 vs. 18
Slide 15
Backhaul on Demand
Step 1:
Single PtP link
Step 2:
Zero footprint sector
GE
GE
GE
GE
Step 3:
Multi-sector Gigabit
Ethernet Hub
GE
GE
Outdoor
Indoor
Site a PMP Ethernet Hub
where there is a need to
provide or upgrade backhaul
coverage
GE
Add sectors as demand increases
GE
Hub economics enable variable sector
sizes/capacities
GE
Radio Controller available to aggregate
multiple sectors and provide hybrid
support
New sites require one radio –
deployment time halved
GE
PMP system architecture enables a paradigm shift in microwave
backhaul network design
In Confidence
Cambridge Broadband Networks Ltd.
Slide 16
Stat-Mux and Aggregation
Point-to-Point backhaul planners have to
provision for peaks, i.e. 30Mb/s per NodeB:
Total provisioning: 4 x 30Mbps = 120 Mbps
PTP: Bandwidth not used is wasted!
Traffic measurements from
4 HSPA Node Bs in a
VectaStar network sector
VectaStar aggregates cellsite traffic in sector
Built-in optimisation and statistical
multiplexing reduces peak backhaul
requirement to 40
30Mbps
150
Mbps
Sector
th’put
Mbps
Vectastar: Unused bandwidth is available
for other cellsites in the sector
30Mbps
120
Mbps
30Mbps
40Mbps
40Mbps
30Mbps
In Confidence
Cambridge Broadband Networks Ltd.
Slide 17
Case Study: LTE Network London
LTE PMP Backhaul solution
for London:
• 145 Cell sites
• 8 Hub sites
• 150Mb/s Peak
• 30Mb/s Mean
Utilises overlapping sectors
to increase capacity in
dense, high traffic areas
Comparison showed that at
100Mbps, PtP exhausts
available spectrum.
VectaStar used less than
half the spectrum needed
for PtP
In Confidence
Cambridge Broadband Networks Ltd.
Slide 18
London LTE network business case
VectaStar CAPEX
advantage
compared to
Implemented PtP
from 2 links:
Point to Point is 80%
more expensive
at 15 links
VectaStar Cost to Deploy Compared to Point-to-Point
250
CAPEX
200
Price ($)
Point to Point is 40%
more expensive
at 5 links
VectaStar vs Point to Point - Proposed Equipment & Installation Market Price
150
Implemented P2P
Implemented VectaStar
Ideal P2P
100
50
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Number of Links
Broader London Case Study of Savings over 5 year Business Case - With 360
BTS and 13 Hubs – Net Present Value:
Point to Point is 44% more expensive in CAPEX (First Year)
Point to Point is 38% more expensive in OPEX (All Years)
VectaStar used Half the Spectrum of the PtP solution
Deploy PMP Access Point Network for Lower Capex than PtP - AND save on OPEX
In Confidence
Cambridge Broadband Networks Ltd.
Slide 19
PMP Microwave Backhaul
NEXT GENERATION
BACKHAUL
In Confidence
Cambridge Broadband Networks Ltd.
Slide 20
Key LTE Backhaul Requirements
HSPA 1.8  168
Single or Multi carrier (Multi carrier for Max
Rates)
Peak Download: 168Mb/s for multiple 5MHz
carrier
Standard final: 2004+, First Deploy: 2005-2007 +
Commercial: Now (except highest options:
2012(e))
1. Capacity
BTS Backhaul must be more than 30-50Mb/s average
& 150Mb/s peak; >300Mb/s peak by 2014
LTE 1x2 SIMO
Variable Carriers: 1.25, 5, 10, 20MHz
Peak Download: 100Mb/s for 20MHz carrier
Standard final: 2009, First Deploy: 2010,
Commercial: 2011-2012+
2. Synchronization
Backhaul must be synchronous with & transparent to
several schemes being considered/used.
3. X2 Switching and Flat Networks
LTE 2x2 MIMO
Variable Carriers: 1.25, 5, 10, 20MHz
Peak Download: 173 Mb/s for 20MHz carrier
Standard final: 2009, First Deploy: 2010,
Commercial: 2012-2014+
Ability to turn traffic at Hub (not in core) and support
simplest flat network hierarchy
4. Low Latency
Backhaul last link latency must be a fraction of total
latency requirement of ~10ms end-end
In Confidence
Cambridge Broadband Networks Ltd.
LTE 4X4 MIMO
Variable Carriers: 1.25, 5, 10, 20MHz
Peak Download: 326 Mb/s for 20MHz carrier
Standard final: 2009, First Deploy: 2013(e),
Commercial: 2014-2015+
Slide 21
What makes VectaStar different
Extremely simple, cost effective microwave backhaul platform
Gigabit Ethernet ODU
Gigabit Ethernet Sector
Unique 26 & 28 GHz Radios:
Highest spectral efficiency
5 bits/s/Hz net throughput (data)
All outdoor zero footprint design
Powerful integrated processor
Hitless Dynamic Adaptive Modulation
7 states: QPSK to 256QAM
Supports PtP & PMP architectures
Single platform addresses entire network
IP/Ethernet
Network
IP/Ethernet
Network
Outdoor
Outdoor
-48V DC
Supply
Indoor
Indoor
-48V DC
Supply
VectaStar Terminal
VectaStar Hub
• 150Mb/s Ethernet throughput
• Gigabit Ethernet
• Gigabit interface
• Hybrid support via 8xE1 IDU
• Hybrid and Optimisation
support via radio controller
•Typical latency <600 µs
• Deploy as PtP or PMP
• LTE Ready
• LTE Ready
In Confidence
Cambridge Broadband Networks Ltd.
Slide 22
Buy it now: quadruple capacity tomorrow
Base Throughput
IP Optimisation
200% increase in IP throughput (traffic dependant)
Optimised throughput
600
Software Upgrade for VectaStar
500
Complements existing TDM optimisation feature
400
Mbps
2+0 resiliency
Enables 300Mbps total sector capacity (2 x 28MHz
channels @256QAM)
200
100
Software upgrade for 1+1 redundant AP
configurations
0
CPE/AP
If AP1 fails, all AP1’s,Terminals failover to AP2
until AP1 restored.
2+0 sector in normal operation
300
2+0 AP
Sector operation if an Access
Point fails
AP1
AP2
In Confidence
Cambridge Broadband Networks Ltd.
AP1
AP2
Slide 23
Point-to-Multipoint microwave backhaul
costs less
high performance
reduces complexity
LTE ready
In Confidence
Cambridge Broadband Networks Ltd.




Slide 24
Thank You!
VectaStar
No other microwave
Solution does this
In Confidence
Cambridge Broadband Networks Ltd.
Slide 25
Lance Hiley, VP Marketing
[email protected]
www.cbnl.com
Slide 26