the roots of nordic networking

Download Report

Transcript the roots of nordic networking

THE ROOTS OF NORDIC NETWORKING
The worlds first international,
multiprotocol network
Rolf Nordhagen
University of Oslo
The beginning
• An Open network is a network that follows a
common, open standard, OSI
• National academic networks, UNINETT 1978,
SUNET 1980, Centernet, X25 packet switched
• ARPANET to NORSAR, Kjeller, Norway 1973
• Minicomputers, Timesharing, KOM Stockholm,
Oslo
• International Dial-up
Enter NORDUNET
• Nordic Council of Ministers, NORDFORSK
Bjørn Grønlund
•
•
•
•
The first meeting 1980, Dalarne, Sweden
1983-84, the NORDUNET application
May 1985 9.2 Mill.NOK for 4 years
Initially NORDFORSK, then Stockholm
QZ/SICS, Mats Brunell
• Technical manager Einar Løvdal, Oslo
Mats Brunell and Einar Løvdal
The requirements
• A stable, operating computer network, connecting
Nordic Education and Research
• Build on existing university networks
• Use the Nordic telecommunication networks and
international standards for tele- and datacommunication.
• Make a common use of data-resources, programs
and databases available througout the Nordic
area. Users shall be given access to Nordic and
international networks and information services
• Give the same opportunities for collaboration and
information exchange as in European countries
and the North American research communities
Cooperation
• Establish a common Nordic infrastructure for
the NR&E community by connecting the
national nets.
• New competence and services be created for
the smaller communities.
• The resources to be found in the national
network organisations, with the local,
university services operating the net.
• A computer network would greatly increase
bridging the large geographical distances
caracteristic in the Nordic countries. Thus
opportunities for research in remote
communities would be greatly improved.
Interim services
• In 1984, IBM donated machines and leased
lines for EARN, European Academic
Research Network (modelled on Bitnet)
• Local Ethernets, private networks X.25, PAD
services - chaos
• Make popular services Nordic wide, X.400
mail EAN
• EARN to Europe, DECnet/HEPNET for
physics
• Work to local groups, EARN in UNI-C, EAN in
UNINETT etc.
Difficult challenges
• Firm belief and political pressure for CO
OSI-protocols.
• Standards slow in coming from ISO and
CCIT
• Slow development of common services.
• Independent development of services in
NORDUNET regarded as unrealistic
• Reorientation of original goals
Reorientation strategy
• Continued support of interim solutions, but
prepare for OSI migration (!)
• Interim solutions to connect to international
networks, EARN, UUCP, DECnet and Internet
• Active participation in European OSI-efforts in
RARE and COSINE, to build competence
• Migration pilots, file transfer, base for further
work, JANET coloured books, ISODE (X.25 over
IP) ?
• Reliable standards and services still regarded as
10 years off (JANET)
In 1987 new possibilities
• No continuation of support for the EARN leased
lines. NORDUNET urged to connect the main
Nordic nodes.
• A major technological breakthrough, bridges to
run Ethernet over slow lines, Vitalink bridges.
• Sudden realisation of a possible Nordic
Ethernet connecting the major nodes
• National Ethernets based on the same
technology connect to a clean Nordic net.
• Institutional Ethernets on national nets connect
users.
• The X.EARN project quickly adopted early 1988
The NORDUNET
multiprotocol plug
•
•
•
•
the basic X.25 service
EARN and RSCS
DECnet
TCP/IP
The challenge not technolgy but
organisation
The distributed service concept
An international, multiprotocol network
NORDUnet,
the operational net
• One stop shop for lines, Scantele
• 64 kb/s Copenhagen, Helsinki, Stockholm,
Trondheim, 9.2 Reykjavik
• Central node KTH, Stockholm
• US NSFnet to Princeton via satellite, 56 kb/s
• KTH connected Europe, EARN, HEPnet
• Peering with EUnet
• European interchange, GIX
• Operating late 1988, official opening Oct.89
Rey kjavik
Trondheim
GIX Washington
Stockholm
BALTnet Talli n
EMPB London
Copenhagen
Ebone Paris
EMPB Amsterdam
BALTnet Vilnius
NASK Warshaw
Not only a network
• Inter-Nordic work-groups created
competence on many levels
• Catalytic effect on national networks
and early commercial introduction
• Joint activities creating international
recognition and status in international
bodies
International recognition
• The first DNS root-server outside US
• RIPE as European Internet coordinator
• Participating and forming IEPG and IETF
Operation WG, other IETF work, MIME
• In RARE WG8-management introducing open
support of protocols and services, including
TCP/IP as well as ISO OSI work
(controversial!)
Europe and TCP/IP
– Work on service harmonisation and OSI
migration continued
– Einar Løvdals urge for TCP/IP migration
met with mixed reactions (Trieste 1989)
– Support from research communities
collaborating w. US and Canada
– RIPE formed 1989, RIPE NCC in 1992
– Large European communities forged
ahead with OSI based services
- and fell behind -
Nordic Internet penetration
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
1999
Canada
Sweden
Finland
U.S.
Iceland
Denmark
Norway
97
42,82 7
41,42 8
40,80 1
40,65 4
40,35 3
39,60 10
37,96 2
1999
8 Australia
34,33
9 Singapore 31,08
10 N.Zealand 26,49
11 Netherland 25,56
12 Switzerland 24,58
13 United
Kingdom 23,64
% per capita
97
5
9
6
13
11
12
And finally TCP/IP
US link
The rest is history !
NORDUnet is now a limited company NORDUnet A/S,
owned and financed by Nordic states or state institutions
DK
FI
IS
- UNI-C
- Ministry of education
- University of Iceland
NO
SE
- UNINETT
- Högskoleverket
200
Yearly
budgets
Director Peter Villemoes
All work done
by partners
MDKK/year
Small secretariat
20 M$
100
10 M$
0
1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002
The network in 2001
KPNQwest
USA
622
1866
1344
NETNOD
D-GIX
45
16
12
1
Géant
34
Communication is
Cooperation
• Services could not be done by one provider alone
• The necessary level of competence could not be
reached on a country by country basis
• Institutional groups too small both in
–people with interest and knowledge
–resources and demanding users
• Development cooperation required on all levels
The NORDUNET lesson
• Many institutions scattered across several
countries worked together by each getting
major responsibilities
• Distributed projects create joint enthusiasm
and work towards common goals
• Shared responsibilities
• All got benefit from building competence
• Network communication is working together
Networks are communication
Communication is cooperation
etworks are cooperation
"Skalat madr rúnar rísta,
nema ráda vel kunni”
Egill Skallagrimsson