Transcript - EFF

Net/ Internet Neutrality
PREPARED FOR
EFF-Austin
February 15, 2007
Internet neutrality
The architects of the Internet had
no idea what this network would
ultimately be used for.
It was architected so their
ignorance wouldn’t stop it from
developing.
This principle is what made the
revolution possible.
- Larry Lessig
2
2
Internet neutrality
 Unlimited accessibility (limited exceptions) - Any consumer with an
internet connection can access a data network which has no
discriminatory restrictions and attach any kind of equipment, post any
content, provide any service and communicate in any manner in a
way that does not degrade one set of communications for another.
 All routers deliver all packages equally without regard to content -
non-discrimination - each user can send and receive traffic to or from
any location on the internet.
 Allows users to create and use new services, applications, protocols
and devices without negotiating or even consulting with network
operators. (WWW. VOIP, IM. Independently developed).
 Users have the freedom to connect at different speeds and service
levels according to needs and budgets.
 Network operators interconnect freely
3
3
Internet neutrality
 Preserving the Internet rather than, non-internet services
carried over broadband networks.
 Preserving the internet as an open platform for speech
and innovation without gatekeepers or centralized control
is seen as the defining issue.
 The focus should be on “internet neutrality” not “network
neutrality”.
 Protect the essential characteristics of internet service
that exist now and use the least intrusive means of doing
so.
4
4
Internet neutrality
“The neutral communications medium
is essential to our society. It is
the basis of a fair competitive
market economy. It is the basis of
democracy, by which a community
should decide what to do. Let us
protect the neutrality of the net”
- Tim Berners-Lee
5
5
The ISP position
 Special arrangements with certain subscribers
 Private networks - branded services
 Preferred packages, prioritized delivery and quality
 Investing in new bandwidth - capital markets
 Costs of new networks, installing equipment and ills
 Swamping - Increased demands especially video
 Investments will not meet demand - max-out bandwidth
 Rapid development of new technologies - rich media, etc.
 Users moving away from traditional phone companies
 Legislation not necessary
6
6
Potential ISP action
 Control of information
 Preferred packages
 Tiered offerings
 Excessive lag
 Prohibition on activities, (such as on-line games, free
telephone)
 Marginalization of non-profitable services
 Traffic analyzers and monitoring software
 Megamergers
7
7
Internet neutrality
“There is always a rhythm to
the space between things”
- DJ Spooky
8
8
Recent suggestions
 Change from flat rate
 Maximizing profits by discriminating on non-internet-based activities
 Dealing with the heavy users (80% of traffic generated by small
minority)
 Virtual toll booths
 Proactive intervention
 New legislation - potential house vote - include net neutrality
provisions
 Broader offerings help make the Internet more attractive
9
9
The world is changing
 Numerous new media, entertainment, business, communication
applications are internet based
 The shift from broadcast to networked
 Desire to heighten experience - multi-sensory
 Growth in user-determined personalized media
 Bottom up and top-down content creation
 Standardization of tools, payment methods, parallel marketplaces
 Desire for augmentation and enhancement
 To connect, create, share, select, transform, remix
 Desire for real-time, ubiquitous access
10
10
The world is changing

Quad delivery (internet, IPTV, VOD, Audio)

Multi-user, multi-channel, multi-position

Collaborative tables and tools

Virtual tourism, geolocation, annotated environments

User generated video, open source video

3D environments (converged with video)

Affective systems, proactive computing

Emotive systems and intuitive interfaces

Ubiquity of media tied together with/by broadband

Delivery/exchange (P2P), podcasts

Fully integrated with common digital formats (Powerpoint, Excel, Quicktime,
web-browsers

Immersive gaming / telepresence

CRM / data management

Global, arts …..
11
11
Some open questions
 Defining the term of Internet
 Who owns the internet? Ownership v.s. access.
 Does bandwidth provision / router represent ownership or access?
 Router v.s. social rights?
 Are all packets equal?
 Is the internet simply becoming a marketplace? Democracy v.s.
hyper-capitalism
 Does that change how stakeholders should behave or rights?
 Who are the future stakeholders are they different?
 What is the minimum level of internet neutrality?
 How do we decide the priorities? Multiple fee levels? Who
decides?
12
12
Some open questions
 Services, packages, frequency of use, bandwidth consumption?
 Internet v.s. special services
 Which new services will impact these decisions?
 Media, business, entertainment, collaboration, data management?
 What about the future - a new internet structure? Parallel?
 Will we ever keep up with bandwidth needs? Quality of service.
Convergence on IP.
 Who Invests? Do we need legislation? What is the compromise
position?
 Impact on wireless networks?
 Emergency lanes?
13
13
The audience
 Which side of the debate did you enter?
 On which side did you leave?
14
14