Voice over other technologies
Download
Report
Transcript Voice over other technologies
ACT Week 11
Voice over packet transport technologies
Format of lecture:
Follow up week 9 and week 10 lecture on VoIP
To look at the packet efficiency of VoIP
VoIP practical tonight
Version 1 Feb 2005
[email protected] &
[email protected]
Slide 1
ACT Week 11
Definition of a good voice packet
High Bandwidth
High Quantitative
High Qualitative
High Speed
No bottleneck
Version 1 Feb 2005
[email protected] &
[email protected]
Slide 2
ACT Week 11
Layer 2 OSI model
Layer 2 of OSI model is an important layer for
Voice over packet.
This layer provide information how available
bandwidth can be shared.
Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) is a method of
transmitting packet between an ISP and a
home user over a dial-up link.
Frame relay and ATM are other faster
methods for WAN
Version 1 Feb 2005
[email protected] &
[email protected]
Slide 3
ACT Week 11
Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS)
MPLS integrates Layer 2 information about network
links (bandwidth, latency, utilization) into Layer 3 (IP).
It provide better information for the router for routing
efficiency.
It includes the more information on the packet which
are called MPLS shim.
These are extra information labels for the routers
Version 1 Feb 2005
[email protected] &
[email protected]
Slide 4
ACT Week 11
Real time Protocol (RTP)
IP protocol provides only means to transmit
data packet between source and destination
Transmission time may vary from packet to
packet, therefore RTP is needed to provide
timing information to ensure correct
reconstruction at the receiver
Version 1 Feb 2005
[email protected] &
[email protected]
Slide 5
ACT Week 11
Voice over IP
In IP network, voice is transported over RTP
Either PPP or SONET/SDH for data link layer
PPP adds a fixed amount of overhead per IP packet
SONET/SDH overhead per IP packet depends on the length
of IP packet
Version 1 Feb 2005
[email protected] &
[email protected]
Slide 6
ACT Week 11
Voice over Frame Relay
Voice over Frame Relay includes the
multiplexing of several voice packets from a
single call into a subframe
Version 1 Feb 2005
[email protected] &
[email protected]
Slide 7
ACT Week 11
Voice over ATM
Voice can be transported over ATM using
AAL1
AAL5 which are suited to constant bit rate
voice therefore not benefit for silence removal.
Version 1 Feb 2005
[email protected] &
[email protected]
Slide 8
ACT Week 11
Voice over MPLS
There are 3 alternatives for data link layer for
MPLS
PPP
Ethernet
ATM
Version 1 Feb 2005
[email protected] &
[email protected]
Slide 9
ACT Week 11
Advantages of each Voice packet
VoIP has the benefits of mature networks, good
software available to use and required only low
bandwidth that header compression can be used.
VoATM has the advantage that it is standardised for
voice over DSL.
VoFR has the advantage that it is a widely used
access technology for enterprise users
MPLS has the advantages of software upgrade,
efficient routing and better security as MPLS VPN
Version 1 Feb 2005
[email protected] &
[email protected]
Slide 10
ACT Week 11
Overhead for each voice transport
The variable overhead is the transport
overhead per voice packet
The fixed overhead is the transport overhead
independent of the number f voice packets
Version 1 Feb 2005
[email protected] &
[email protected]
Slide 11
ACT Week 11
Voice over GPRS
In total, the data header is 50 bytes and 10-35
bytes of encoded speech for normal voice
packet on a network.
Efficiency is less than 50%.
Further overheads are needed in GPRS and
in total more than 60 byte and this cause the
efficiency is much less.
Version 1 Feb 2005
[email protected] &
[email protected]
Slide 12
ACT Week 11
Voice over GPRS
GPRS was designed for non-real time data
and does not as such provide the same
efficiency for speech as circuit switched GSM
Some modification to GPRS standards are
needed in order to reach good quality of
speech
Compress header information
More encoded frame encapsulated into the packet
Version 1 Feb 2005
[email protected] &
[email protected]
Slide 13
ACT Week 11
Summary of voice over packet
VoMPLS give good QoS on aggregated traffic and
high bandwidth efficiency.
VoIP has scalable with qualitative guarantee but no
QoS on quantitative.
VoATM has quantitative guarantees and network
widely available and proven management.
VoFr has very high bandwidth efficiency.
VoGPRS lacks of packet efficiency, too many
overhead included in GRPS frame compared to
encoded frame.
Version 1 Feb 2005
[email protected] &
[email protected]
Slide 14