Transcript No Slide Title

Advanced optical network research
in the EU Information Society Technologies Program,
the FP5-IST OPTIMIST and FP6 IST-BREAD project.
Presented by
Christina (Tanya) Politi
University of Essex
Acknowledgements
On behalf of the IST OPTIMIST and IST BREAD consortia:
Authors: Ann Ackaert (1), Didier Colle (1), Piet Demeester (1), Peter Van Daele (1), Paul
Lagasse (1), Mike O’Mahony (2), Tanya Politi (2), Bjarne Tromborg (3), Knud Erik Skouby (3),
Didier Erasme (4), Erwin Patzak (5), Jurgen Saniter (5), Paul Vogel (6), Sathya Rao (6), Tom
Pearsall (7), J.C. Burgelman (8), J.C. Point (9)
Affiliation:
(1) IMEC-Ghent University, Department INTEC, Belgium
(2) University of Essex, Department ESE, UK
(3) Research Center COM, Denmark
(4) GET-ENST, France
(5) FhG-HHI, Germany
(6) Telscom consulting, Switzerland
(7) Genie Conseil, France
(8) JRC – Institute of Prospective Technological Studies, Spain
(9) JCP-Consult, France
All these members of the OPTIMIST and BREAD project consortia can be reached by sending
an email to [email protected]
Coordinators and partners of the IST projects here are thankfully acknowledged
Overall Timeline
1998 1999 2000
2001 2002
2003
2004 2005 2006
FP5
FP4
HORIZON
FP5 - IST projects
OPTIMIST project
OPTIMIST_II
BREAD project
FP6
FP6 funded projects
Coordination Action within FP5
OPTIMIST: Optical
Technologies in Motion
for the IST Programme
Email: [email protected]
http://www.ist-optimist.org
OPTIMIST Main Objectives
 Initiate and manage a thematic network
within the framework of the IST programme
 Cluster RTD projects active within the area
of Photonics within the whole IST Programme
 Enhance inter-project collaboration,
foster synergies and encourage consensus
building
OPTIMIST Main Objectives
Disseminate the results and strategies of
the cluster
External interactions with other photonic
activities/ programmes and projects at large
Support the creation and endorsement of
European policies through the drawing of
"Technology Trends in Photonic
Technologies and Optical Networking”
EU- Current/Recent Network Projects
• Approximately 60 projects funded
• Framework V drawing to a close
G
R
A
N
U
L
A
R
I
T
y
FLEXIBILITY
Static
current
DAVID
Packet
STOLAS
Burst
Circuit
Dynamic
WINMAN
ATRIUM
LION
Access
Metro
Wide Area
HARMONICS
METEOR
LION
GIANT
STOLAS
ATRIUM
OBANET
DAVID
Final
Demos
Dynamic Circuit Switching –LION
Layers Internetworking In Optical Networks
Telecom Italia +…
reference network
scenario :
Automatic Switched
Optical Networks /
Generalised-MPLS
Client A
Management Plane
NMS
CP
CP
CP
Control Plane
ITU-T
Rec. G.807
Rec. G.8080
Standards
IETF, OIF
Transport Plane
UNI
UNI
NNI
NNI
Client B
• Traffic/demand model for ASON/ASTN networks
• Definition of guidelines on the optimisation of the transport network evolution
(flexible connection provisioning, control plane, management plane, resilience, …)
• ASON for survivability/ resilience using the ASON flexibility
• Study of ASON dimensioning and dynamic traffic conditions resulting in a joint
optimisation planning scheme
IST LION: Achievements/Results
T-Nova
NMS Interdomain NMS
test-bed development and demo
interworking via a
CORBA-based interface
Siemens
Domain
ci@oNet
NMS
IP
OXC2
IP
OXC3
IP
TILAB
Domain
OXC1
Siemens
OXCs with
NNI signaling
OADM1
OADM3
OADM2
IP
Tellium OXC with
restoration
capabilities
TILAB NNI
signaling
G.709 interfaces
Cisco GSR with
fast reroute
capabilities
IP
OXC4
Tellium Domain
Burst Switching –STOLAS
Switching Technologies for Optically Labeled Signals
Network management
TU Eindhoven +IMEC +…
Access/Metro
network
Access/Metro
network
Edge
router
la
Access/Metro
network
Core
router
packets
STOLAS:
2 levels of optical
labeling
Label level 2
Optical label
controlled router
Label level 1
(in wavelength)
(in FSK/DPSK)
Payload (in IM)
IST STOLAS:
Network simulations & traffic input
Assume a Full-Service STOLAS network with
aggregated traffic inputs. Create a realistic
traffic input scenario for this network that may
be representative of a typical European region
in year 2009. Realistic traffic input created
using three generic sources: Voice (Poisson),
Data (Pareto), Video (Gamma).
Traffic Input
Architectures
Node Architectures
Traffic sources
Synchronisation
Customer
segmentation
Client network, region
Burstification
strategies
Penetration scenarios
Priority strategies
Core routers
Simulations
Edge Routers
Performance
evaluations
High bit rate transmission - IST projects
ETDM / WDM
OTDM / WDM
ATLAS
TOPRATE
METEOR
FASHION
ATLAS
High Speed- FASHION
Ultrafast Switching in High Speed OTDM Networks
Siemens (G), TU Eindhoven (NL), BT Exact (UK)
Trib 1
1 1 00 0 011 1 0 1
Trib 2
Trib 3
OTDM: optical time
domain multiplexing
OTDM Signal
Trib 4
Optical (de-)multiplexing
Networking ??
Flexible Transmission 
Mux
(OTDM)
Add/Drop
(OTDM)
Tx 10
Tx 10
Tx 10
160 Gb/s
Tx 10
core
Demux
(OTDM)
160 Gb/s
Rx 10
Rx 10
Rx 10
outer core
core edge node
Rx 10
1st exchange
access
core
Networking setup: Field Trial Ipswich (UK)
Ipswich ATE
Newmarket
Ipswich ATE
Rx
10G
160G Transmitter
Tx
10G
drop
MuX
10G160G
add
TD-ADM
SMF
68.85 km
DCM
SMF
68.85 km
CR1
CR2
160G Receiver
Rx
10G
Tx
10G
FWM-DeMuX
160G10G
SMF
68.85 km
DCM
SMF
68.85 km
IST TOPRATE
“Terabit/s Optical Transmission Systems based on Ultra-high Channel Bitrate”
RX: Clock recovery
160:40 Gbit/s demux
TX: 4x40 Gbit/s OTDM multiplexing
40 Gbit/s
80 Gbit/s
160 Gbit/s
160:40 Gbit/s demux
IST TOPRATE: Achievements/ Results
• Optical Time Division Multiplexing (OTDM) technology
– to the next bitrate hierarchy of 160 Gbit/s and beyond
– full use of 40 Gbit/s ETDM technology
• Dense Wavelength Division Multiplexing (DWDM)
– Nx160 Gbit/s DWDM / use of AWG demultiplexers
• Fibre transmission
– Dispersion management optimization
– 160 Gbit/s single channel transmission over 2x100 km
– 4x160 Gbit/s DWDM transmission over 3x80 km
• Many novel techniques investigated / used for
–
–
–
–
PMD compensation: tunable planar devices (PLC)
electronic 40Gbit/s eye-monitoring
optical demultiplexing: novel photonic crystal fibre
optical clock recovery: 40 GHz optical clock operated in 160 Gbit/s receiver
National Initiatives on OPS
-examples
UK National Research Council:
Optical Packet Switching (OPSNET/OPORON): Universities Essex, Cambridge,
Strathclyde+ BT, Marconi, Fujitsu
1m euros over 3yrs
Objective: Demonstration of an IP end-to-end path, through edge router
and core packet switch operating at 40 Gb/s
optical packet switch
edge aggregator
WDM
IP out
IP in
packetiser
40 Gb/s; MPLS Control plane
National Initiatives on OBS/OPS
-examples
Ministry for Education, Science Research & Technology [Germany]
TransiNet: Transport Networks for the Broadband Internet:
HHI, Univs Stuttgart, Berlin, Munich+ T-Nova Telekom
Objective: To develop new system concepts for the efficient transport of IP
traffic over optical and wireless networks
Focus on optical label switching or optical burst switching as first steps to
increase the dynamics of the network
core
node
edge
node
OBS Network
edge
node
core
node
core
node
• control issues/comparison with OPS/simulations
www.ist-optimist.org
Email: [email protected]
Coordination Action within FP6
BREAD
BRoadband in Europe for All:
a multi-Disciplinary approach
Challenges in FP6:
Communications & Networking
Mobility, beyond
3G Domain
IP Transport Control & Routing
Optical Core Network
Broadband
Access Domain
IP Optical
Convergenc
e & Control
Network & Service
Management Domain
IP Services and Applications
BREAD Objectives
• Develop a multi-disciplinary view for the realisation of
‘broadband for all’
• Combine forces in the area of
– state-of-the-art results in R&D on the technological level
– expertise towards the economic sustainability and the in-time
adoption of adequate bussiness models
– expertise and study towards the regulatory aspects on EU level and
the re-conciliation of customers’ and industries’ interests
• Develop a more holistic vision encompassing technical, as
well as economical and regulatory aspects
• Identify roadblocks on European, national/regional level
• Share visions and best practices on national level to EU
level (ERA)
• Benchmarking the EU situation with US & AP develop.
Project Key Issues
• Interdisciplinary workshops, working groups, studies.
• Set up of an information exchange platform
• Support the concertation & networking of IST projects
• Stimulate concertation with national/regional initiatives in the
ERA framework
• Assist in the dissemination at large of IST results
• Create documents (based on input from IST-projects) for good
practice with respect to the concurrent development approach
for new services.
• Develop visioning documents on evolutionary scenarios, and
providing gap analysis identifying R&D priorities
FP6 Broadband for All: Projects
IPs:
FETs:
Integrated projects
Future & Emerging Technologies
Wireless
Broadband
Access
Broadband
Fixed Access
OPERA
Core
Network
LASAGNE
M
BROADWAN
U-BROAD
U
SATLIFE
S E-PHOTON
GANDALF
CAPANINA
E EURO NGIN
FLEXINET
OBAN
O
MOME B
ATHENAProtocols, Interoperability
E NoEs:
DIADEM FIREWALL
Network and service management L Networks of Excellence
CAs:
COCOMBINE BREAD
STREPs:
Specific targeted research project
Techno-Economics
Coordination actions
MUSE
Multi-Service Access Everywhere
MUSE
System vendors
Alcatel
Operators
Research Inst. & Universities
Ericsson
BT Exact
IMEC
Lucent
DT AG
Inria
Siemens
FT R&D
Budapest University (BUTE)
TNO Telecom
ICCS/NTUA
Telia
HHI
TI Lab
Lund Institute of Technology (LTH)
Telefonica
TU Eindhoven
PT Inovação
ACREO
CPE
vendor Thomson
Component
Infineon vendors
ST Micro-electronics
SME
Robotiker
Aarhus BB society
Univ. Carlos III de Madrid
University of Essex
27 Partners: Lead Alcatel/ Duration 2 years
MUSE
Multi-Service Access Everywhere
Research and development of a low cost, full service broadband access/edge
network for wireline and wireless applications
Low cost
Low capex and opex (< ca. 100 Euro/month for the end user)
Cost effective migration to high BW (ready for 100 Mbit/s per user by
2010)
Multi-service and multi-hosting access
Enable the delivery of various attractive services with appropriate QoS
Enable new business role models resulting in efficient co-operations
between players and competitive prices for the end user
User friendly for the end-user
Everywhere
Technologies in MUSE enable to reach >80% of European citizens
Consensus by almost all major players (operators, system, component)
MUSE:- Access and edge network
Application
Subscriber, QoS,
server
and OAM management
Edge
node
Internet
FTTH
Access
multiplexer
Wireless feeder
PSTN
Access Aggregation
Network
Home
gateways
DSL
Kerb/Cabinet
Application
servers
NOBEL
“Next generation Optical network for Broadband European Leadership
• Consortium:
Telecom Italia (TILAB), T-Systems, Telefonica, France Telecom, BT, TeliaSonera, Telenor, NTT,
Alcatel, Cisco, Ericsson, ACREO, Lucent, Marconi, Pirelli Labs, Siemens,
AGH, CTTC, HHI, IMEC, NTUA, Politecnico of Milano, Scuola Sup. S.Anna,
UCL, Univ. Budapest, Univ. Stuttgart, UPC
• Prime Contractor: Telecom Italia (TILAB)
•
•
•
•
•
Duration:
Starting date:
Total man-months:
Total costs:
EC grant to the budget:
2 years
January, 2004
1980
24.5 M€
13.7 M€
NOBEL
mechanisms to guarantee end-to-end service quality
efficient
efficient aggregation core transport
of access traffic
multi-service
integration
Management
System
efficient
metro transport
Automatic
Provisioning
Multi-layer
Traffic
Engineering
DXC
management
of new services
Multi-layer
Restoration
Efficient
Transport
OXC
IP Router
Distributed
Intelligence
Core and metro optical networks for end-to-end broadband services
NOBEL
Transport Nodes, network
Management and Control
Network Studies
REQUIREMENTS
WP3
WPG1
WP3
Advanced Packet
Burst Switching
ADVANCED PACKET
BURST SWITCHING
WP4
NETWORK MANAGEMENT
AND CONTROL/PROTOCOLS
NETWORK SCENARIO
AND SOLUTIONS
WP1
ARCHITECTURAL ASPECTS
FOR END-TO-END
SERVICES
WP6
NETWORK SCENARIO
WP2 AND SOLUTIONS
SURVIVABILITY,
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING,
TECHNO-SOCIO ECONOMIC STUDIES
REQUIREMENTS,
NETWORK SCENARIOS
WP5
TRANSMISSION AND
PHYSICAL ASPECTS
Enabling technologies
and test-bed / fieldtrial integration
REQUIREMENTS,
NODE PROTOTYPES
WP7
EXPERIMENTAL VALIDATION,
TECHNOLOGIES
MULTI-SERVICE NODE
ARCHITECTURES
ENABLING TECHNOLOGIES
AND COMPONENTS
WP8
INTEGRATED TEST BED AND
RELATED EXPERIMENTAL
ACTIVITIES
EXPERIMENTAL VALIDATION,
TECHNOLOGIES
NOBEL Questionnaire: OpEx
for backbone networks
• Benchmark for OpEx costs for a European backbone/ individual
companies evaluate their own cost structure.
• All people having input with respect to OpEx for backbone are
invited to fill in the questionnaire on-line
https://www.atlantis.ugent.be/quest/
or to communicate their views directly via email with
[email protected]
Network of Excellence: e-Photon/ONe
e-Photon/ONe: Towards Bandwidth Manageability and Cost Efficiency
• 40 partners across Europe
• Lead partner Politecnico di Torino
• 2 yr duration / 2.5 m euros [Start Feb 2004]
• Core/Metro/Access/Home networking
Switching systems [Circuit/Burst/Packet]
Control planes
Transmission aspects
• Collaborative research between partners
• Interaction with non-EU partners [USA/Japan/Australia…]
www.ist-bread.org
BROADBAND EUROPE: 8-9-10 December 2004,
Location: Brugge, Belgium
Finish
Thank You
[email protected]
All the members of the OPTIMIST and BREAD project consortia
can be reached by sending an email to [email protected]