Powerpoint - UCLA Fielding School of Public Health
Download
Report
Transcript Powerpoint - UCLA Fielding School of Public Health
Federal & State
HIV/AIDS Policy
UCLA School of Public Health
Epidemiology 227
April 23, 2010
Prof. Arleen Leibowitz
UCLA School of Public Affairs
Outline
Care and Treatment
Testing and Prevention
Medicaid
Medicare
Ryan White CARE Act
Private Insurance and Health Reform Changes
California issues
Research
Income Support and Housing
Global Programs
Follow The Funding to Determine Priorities
FY 2010 Federal HIV/AIDS Budget Request
($ Billions)
Global, $6.46
Treatment,
$13.53
Research,
$2.62
Housing/$,
$2.45
Prevention,
$0.79
National Treatment Guidelines Call for
Early Access to Treatment and Care
But many PLWH are not in regular care
About 21% do not know their HIV status
Only 55% of those meeting clinical criteria for ARV therapy
get it
Expanded guidelines
HAART is costly
$12,000/year in ARV costs
$20,000/year in total costs
Insurance Status of HIV Patients in Care,
1996
Uninsured
20%
Private
32%
Medicaid
29%
Medicare
19%
Federal Support for Care and Treatment
(FY2010)
Medicaid (Federal share)
Medicare
Ryan White
$4.7 B
$5.1 B
$2.3 B
(ADAP
34.6%
37.5%
16.9%
$0.8 B)
Veterans Affairs
SAMHSA
HOPWA
FEHBP
$0.8 B
$0.2 B
$0.3 B
$0.1 B
Total
$13.5 B
5.9%
1.5%
2.2%
0.7%
Two Kinds of Federal Spending
Mandatory spending
Presumption that Congress must allocate funding to meet
statutory obligation – e.g., Medicare, Medicaid, SSI
“Entitlements”
Defined benefit
Discretionary spending
Congress decides on spending level each year
Defined contribution
Block grants
Examples: NIH, CDC, Ryan White, VA
Problems With Discretionary Spending
Block grant means that the budget does not increase to
accommodate increased enrollment
Health care costs rise faster than CPI, so annual
increases are “high”
Long-term health investments are discouraged by
annual budget process
Prevention may reduce costs in long run, but not in short
Early treatment of HIV may save money in long run
Share of discretionary spending is falling
Medicaid
Created in 1965
Federal/state health insurance program for low income
and disabled
Federal government pays a minimum of 50% of costs,
more in low income states (average 55% of HIV $)
Jointly administered
States set eligibility criteria, subject to Federal minima
States set benefits, subject to Federal mandated benefits
Current Medicaid Eligibility
States must cover
Certain poor women and children
Disabled who qualify for SSI (unable to engage in
“substantial gainful activity by reason of… (a medical
condition) ….expected to result in death or that has
lasted…up to 12 months”)
States set income criteria
State option to cover Medically Needy who “spend
down” to income criteria
Medicaid Benefits
Covers most services with no or minimal cost-sharing
Drugs, an optional service, are covered in all states
Optional services include case management, hospice
Some states limit services
Number of Rx per month or year
Number of MD visits
Medicaid – Current Policy Issues
State variability in Medically Needy income eligibility criteria
75% FPL
7% FPL
States can impose limits on discretionary services (drugs)
Non-citizens can not qualify for Medicaid
Vermont
Louisiana
Green-card holders must wait 5 years
Medicaid provider payment levels are low, making access
difficult
Medicaid discount on drugs of 15.1% less than what others
get
Medicaid –Policy Issues (2)
Catch-22
Medicaid eligibility depends on being disabled or having
AIDS
But early treatment of non-disabled could avert disability
And reduce transmission
Some states have 1115-waivers to provide Medicaid to
low income people with HIV prior to disability
1115 waiver requires “budget neutrality” --Medicaid savings
>= additional Medicaid costs
But, given fractured system, inpatient savings of ARV
treatment often go to Medicare, SSI or Ryan White
Medicaid –Policy Issues (3)
Lose Medicaid if earnings exceed threshold, however,
earnings may not cover the cost of costly ARV
treatment
In recessions, states attempt to cut Medicaid benefits
Ticket to Work/Work Incentives Improvement Act of 1998
continues Medicaid coverage even if person returns to work
Gov. Schwarzenegger proposed premiums for Medicaid
Federal government raised its match rate during
recession
Health Care Reform and Medicaid
Persons <133% of FPL are eligible for Medicaid from 2014
$14,404 for single individual; $29,327 for family of 4
Does not depend on disability
Individuals w/o dependent children now will qualify
Removes eligibility variation by state, but undocumented still
not eligible
100% federal funding for eligibility expansions in 2014-16,
declining later to 90%
Increases drug 340b rebate to 23.1%, but some goes back to
federal government
Provides 100% federal funding to raise Medicaid
reimbursement rate to Medicare levels for primary care
services in 2013, 2014
Encourages “medical home” for those with chronic conditions
Medicare
Created in 1965
Covers persons 65+, persons with ESRD, and long
term disabled
Funded by payroll tax on earnings, general revenues,
beneficiary premiums for Part B and co-payments
(Medicaid can pay patient cost-sharing)
Uniform throughout U.S.
Medicare: Eligibility for Disabled
Disabled must have sufficient covered work history to
quality for SSDI
29 Month Waiting period
Federal law requires 5 month wait after disability
determination before receiving SSDI payments
24-month waiting period for Medicare, following SSDI
Medicaid coverage for low income persons during the
29 months
Medicare Benefits
Hospital
Outpatient (20% cost-sharing)
Drugs have been covered since January 1, 2006 under
Part D, private drug insurance plans
Plans required to cover all ARVs
Low income subsidy needed for “the donut hole”
Medicare – Current Policy Issues
Eligibility
Must have sufficient work history to qualify for SSDI, a
problem for young, poor persons with HIV
29 month wait for Medicare eligibility
Catch-22 of disability requirement
Cost-sharing
High cost sharing if no supplemental coverage
No cap on out-of-pocket spending
Medicare “donut hole”
When ADAP pays, doesn’t count as “true out of pocket
cost” (TROOP)
Health Reform and Medicare
Medicare “donut” hole will be closed
2010--$350 towards cost
Phase-down coinsurance rate in donut hole from 100% to
25%, starting 2011 by requiring 50% rebate from
manufacturers plus federal 25% subsidy
ADAP payments will count as TROOP in Part D
No cost-sharing for covered preventive services (rated
A or B by U.S. Preventive Services Task Force)
Ryan White Care Act
CARE= Comprehensive AIDS Relief Emergency
Enacted 1990
Administered by Health Resources and Services
Administration (HRSA)
Payer of last resort for 553,000 uninsured and underinsured
PLWA
Outpatient care, including medical, dental, case management,
home health, hospice, housing, transportation, drugs (through
ADAP), insurance continuation
Ryan White Funds Systems of Care
Originally designed to provide relief to cities with
disproportionate burden of caring for HIV/AIDS
Part A:
Part B:
Part C:
Part D:
Part F
Emergency Relief (EMA, TGA)
HIV Care (including ADAP)
Early Intervention
Women, Infants, Children, Youth
AIDS Education and Training,
Dental, SPNS
AIDS Drug Assistance Program (ADAP)
Funded by Part B of Ryan White Care Act
States set eligibility
Congressional Earmark: $835 M (approx 50%)
Plus state supplements (approx 25%)
And rebates from drug manufacturers (approx 25%)
Other Federal funding
5 x FPL in NJ; 4 x FPL in CA; 2 x FPL Texas
Disability not required
Residency, not citizenship required
ADAP is a block grant
States have used waiting lists to ration
ADAP (2)
Drugs provided to 110,000 PLWH monthly in 2008
Cost/enrollee c. $1000/month
Services
HIV Medications
Drug monitoring and adherence services
Can purchase health insurance for eligible clients
Drug Formularies
Must include at least one medication w/I each ARV class
Louisiana had 28 drugs; New York had 460
Ryan White – Current Policy Issues
Discretionary grant program provides a block grant
Growth in PLWHA increases demand for CARE Act services
Medical costs increase faster than CPI
States have limited ability to supplement
Resulted in waiting lists for ADAP
States set eligibility rules, resulting in variability
States with less generous Medicaid programs, need more Ryan White
support
Provides support for non-citizens
Ryan White – Policy Issues (2)
2006 Reauthorization of Ryan White Act revised
funding formulas for Parts A and B
Funding now based on reported HIV cases, not only AIDS
cases
Directs funding to reflect emerging epidemic
California just began names reporting of HIV cases
Required 75% of funding to be used for core medical
services
ADAP - Policy Issues
Coordination with Medicare Part D
Payment for Part D co-pays, deductibles, premiums
ADAPs can pay for drugs in “donut hole”
Increasing demand for ADAP as more PLWHA are
not disabled, but require medication
Longer bridge to Medicaid
New, more costly drugs
ADAP - Policy Issues (2)
Continued availability of prescription rebates?
State fiscal environments challenge states’ ability to
supplement ADAP
States seek to reduce formularies to cut costs
Need to explore cost containment strategies that
maintain client access (i.e. purchasing options)
Health Reform and ADAP
Insurance exchanges should reduce number of
uninsured, and reliance on ADAP
Would provide for medical care, not just drugs
CARE/HIPP could help purchase insurance
ADAP will count as TROOP
Cost of drugs while in donut hole is reduced by 50%
ADAP costs after donut hole should decrease
Effect on rebates?
Effect of health reform on Ryan White funding?
Undocumented
Health Reform and Private Insurance
Eliminates “medical underwriting” and rescissions
Provides subsidies for purchase from exchanges (32
million people by 2019) with mandated benefits
Legal immigrants eligible for subsidies
Bronze plan—covers 60% of cost
Caps out of pocket expenditures for persons<4xFPL
Sets up high risk pool—June 2010 to Jan 2014
Allows children to stay on parents’ policy until age 26
May reduce pressure on COBRA for unemployed
Outline
Care and Treatment
Testing and Prevention
Medicaid
Medicare
Ryan White CARE Act
Health Reform and private insurance
California Issues
Research
Income Support and Housing
Global Programs
HIV Testing
21% of PLWH do not know they are HIV+
CDC “Advancing HIV Prevention” (2004)
1.
2.
3.
4.
Make voluntary HIV testing a part of routine medical care
Test for HIV outside of medical care settings
Prevent new infections by focusing on HIV+ individuals
and their partners
Further decrease perinatal HIV transmission
HIV Testing – Policy Issues
CDC goal to “normalize” HIV testing
Destigmatize
Opt-out vs. opt-in testing recommended by CDC in
Sept. 2006
Default is testing; patient must specifically decline test
Covered by general consent to treat
CA state law since Jan. 1, 2008 removes requirement for
specific written informed consent for testing
Need prevention counseling accompany testing?
Testing—Policy Issues (2)
Rapid test could increase knowledge of HIV status
Results ready in 20 minutes, no need to return for results
But needs to be confirmed if “preliminarily positive”
CA state law relating to who can perform finger prick
test limited use of rapid tests
Just changed
Prevention
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
administers most federal prevention efforts (FY 10
budget: $785.1 B)
National budget share for prevention (4%) is
decreasing over time
California share for prevention <6%
California Cut 09/10 HIV/AIDS Budget
by $59M
State Cut State Cut State Share (09/10)/
(08/09)
($ million) (%)
(%)
C&T, HERR
32.9
100
78.6
0.266
Care & Support 22.8
100
40.0
0.607
SOA
3.0
44.8
31.1
0.728
ADAP
25.0
0-funded Increased
by rebates for FY11
1.00
Prevention: Policy Issues
Balance efforts targeting HIV- and HIV+ individuals
Target increased risk behavior among MSM
Methamphetamine epidemic in CA
Internet—prevention challenge or opportunity?
Reach populations who may not realize their risk and
may not receive routine medical care
Young men are not in routine medical care
STI clinics, EDs, jails?
Separation between federal treatment and prevention
efforts
Prevention – Policy Issues
Federal government promotion of abstinence only
The Task Force on Community Preventive Services concludes that
there is insufficient evidence to determine the effectiveness of groupbased abstinence education delivered to adolescents to prevent
pregnancy, HIV and other sexually transmitted infections (STIs).
HIV Federal Materials Review Process
Congressionally mandated review of HIV prevention education
materials supported by CDC funds
Messages must emphasize ways to fully protect against acquiring or
transmitting the virus
Materials can not directly encourage sexual activities or drug use
Outline
Care and Treatment
Medicaid
Medicare
Ryan White CARE Act
Testing and Prevention
Research
Income Support and Housing
Global Programs
Research
NIH Budget for HIV research is $2.62B in FY10
Largest investments are biomedical
California HIV Research Program
FY07 $12M
Income Support and Housing
Cash Assistance (11% of Domestic HIV funding)
SSI - $500 M in FY10
SSDI - $1,636 M in FY10
Entitlement programs for the disabled
Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS
(HOPWA) $310 M in FY10
AIDS exceptionalism?
Conclusions—Domestic Issues
Health Reform has addressed many HIV/AIDS policy
issues
But, the fragmented system still presents challenges
Outline
Care and Treatment
Medicaid
Medicare
Ryan White CARE Act
Testing and Prevention
Research
Income Support and Housing
Global Programs
Global Programs
President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR)
Most US funding is bilateral, circumvents Global Fund
President Bush proposed $15B commitment over 5 years in 2003
Upped to $48 B over 5 years
But US is still largest single contributor to GF
Obama administration changes in May 2009
Funding at $63B over 6 years Global Health Initiative (GHI)
Shift from emergency response to sustainable mode
Recipient country ownership of planning process
Rebalance Global Health portfolio from HIV to MCH
HIV Is Largest Share of GHI
Slide 10
U.S. Global Health Initiative (GHI), FY 2011 Budget Request
In Millions
HIV
$5,739.1
Global Fund
$1,000
Nutrition
TB
$200
$251
Other
$108
Malaria
MCH
$700
FP/RH
NTDs
$590
$155
$829.2
Total = $9.6 billion
*FY 2011 is President’s Budget Request to Congress.
SOURCES: Kaiser Family Foundation analysis of data from the Office of Management and Budget, Agency Congressional Budget
Justifications, Congressional Appropriations Bills, and White House Statement by the President on Global Health Initiative, May 5, 2009. Return
Also see: Kates J., The U.S. Global Health Initiative: Overview & Budget Analysis, Menlo Park: Kaiser Family Foundation, December 2009.
to Tutorials
Global Policy Issues
2003
55% of funding for treatment;
20% for prevention
33% prevention funding had to
be targeted to abstinence
In 2005, 2/3 on abstinence, 1/3
condoms +
Condoms only for “high-risk”
(prostitutes, discordant couples,
substance abusers)
2010
Over half of funding for
treatment
Target 50% of prevention funds
on abstinence. If less, report to
Congress
AB-C still in place
Global Policy Issues (2)
2003
ARVs must be approved by FDA
(WHO approval not sufficient)
HIV exempted from “gag rule”
on abortions, but many
misunderstood
Funded organizations need
“policy explicitly opposing
prostitution and sex trafficking.”
(PL108-25)
No funding for needle exchange
2010
By 2007, 73% of drugs
distributed were generic.
Accelerated FDA approval.
Pres. Obama rescinded “gag rule”
on abortion
Focus on MTCT, MC and
services for IDUs
Overarching Policy Questions
Will care and treatment crowd out prevention because
we adopt a short term planning horizon?
Why do we spend so little on prevention?
Fragmented funding makes it difficult to
Know what resources are available
Coordinate care
Policy Resources
HRSA
CDC
NIH
http://www.hrsa.gov
http://www.cdc.gov/hiv
http://www.nih.gov
CHRP
http://chrp.ucop.edu
CHIPTS
Kaiser Family Foundation
CAPS
http://chipts.ucla.edu
http://www.kff.org/hivaids
http://www.caps.ucsf.edu