HELP Data for Quality Improvement
Download
Report
Transcript HELP Data for Quality Improvement
Why collect data
Gaining support: Making the case for multiple hospital
constituencies
We want care of older adults to be better! (Clinical staff )
We want improved metrics on hospital acquired adverse
events (quality, safety, cost)
We want an enhanced reputation in the community (PR)
and internally
We want to refine our practice
A need to proactively communicate HELP outcomes to
administration
More than scientific evidence is
needed …..
Characteristics of the innovation and
social/organizational structure predicts the pace and
success of adoption
The Hospital Elder Life Program has been studied as
an example of human technology diffusion and uptake
Study results can guide implementation and
sustainability
Bradley EH, Schlesinger M, Webster TR, Baker D, Inouye SK. "Translating
research into clinical practice: making change happen." Journal of the
American Geriatrics Society 52:1875-1882, 2004
The HELP Model of Care as a
Human Technology
Human technologies: innovations that are
multifaceted
require coordination across disciplines
are not traceable to a specific new technology
involve substantial attitudinal shifts among staff
human resource intensive-investing in human capital
Bradley EH et al. Translating research into Clinical Practice. Making change happen
JAGS 52:1875–1882, 2004.
Types of data- Clinical Outcomes
What clinical outcomes resonate with your hospital’s
priorities?
Delirium
Functional decline /mobility
Fall rate
Pressure ulcer rate
Restraint usage
CA-UTI rate
Inappropriate medication usage
Length of stay
Patient satisfaction/experience
Principles of data collection
Resource it! Data collection, entry and analysis take
time
Use existing data through partnerships ie: Informatics,
Decision Support, Pharmacy, Practice Chiefs
Only collect what you will use.
Use it to refine your service- review 2-4 weeks
If resources are limited, target one indicator and track
for 3-6 months.
Review the HELP manuals for more ideas
Types of data: Process Outcomes
numbers of patients eligible on HELP unit/ numbers
of patients enrolled
Number of volunteers recruited/ turnover rate
Number of geriatric educational events offered to staff
Percentage of assigned volunteer interventions
completed
ELS interventions/nursing intervention
assigned/completed
Types of Data -System outcomes
Staffing turnover/ staffing burden
Readmission rates
Lawsuits rates/ complaints
Inappropriate medication usage
Donation rates
Example 1- Shadyside, Pittsburgh
Financial Gains
Decreased LOS- increases patient turnover
Decreased variable costs (supplies, personnel)
Increased staff satisfaction
Prevent hospital acquired conditions -> less litigation
Revenue generation/preservation
Decreased LOS allows more new admissions
Prevent HACs (x: falls), which are not reimbursed
Reduced readmissions
Increased patient satisfaction
Example 2 - Trillium Health Care
Clinical Indicators: ADL Score, Cognitive Score, incidence of
hospital acquired delirium, pressure ulcers, falls, use of
anti‐psychotic medications
Stakeholder Satisfaction: Patient experience, volunteer
experience, staff satisfaction
Process Indicators: Program volumes (number of patients
screened, Percentage of patients screened, number enrolled
in program), number of interventions completed,
intervention adherence rate
Financial Indicators: Cost savings from hospital acquired
delirium, length of stay, bed days saved
Educational Indicators: %staff who reported increased clinical
knowledge of acute delirium, and HELP post training.
Volunteer Development: Number of volunteers HELP trained
Final thoughts ……….
HELP data collection requires investment of time and
resources from both clinical and administrative staff.
Who will enter what and review when with who?
Data collection can be difficult. Hospital partnerships
are key to ensure the resources for metrics.