Transcript Statistics Related to Subaru Telescope Open Use

Subaru Users Meeting 2009.1.14-16
Statistics Related to Subaru Telescope Open Use
Subaru Open Use Team
Weather Condition Statistics at the Subaru Telescope
Recent Open-Use Related Statistics
Taken from Miyashita homepage ( http://www1.subaru.nao.ac.jp/~akihiko )
/
Distribution of Number of Co-I's
Belonging to a Proposal (S09A)
100
4.0
50
2.0
0
0.0
01
B
S
02
A
S
02
B
S
03
A
S
03
B
S
04
A
S
04
B
S
05
A
S
05
B
S
06
A
S
06
B
S
07
A
S
07
B
S
08
A
S
08
B
S
09
A
S
01
A
S
S
Visiting Observers (Institution）
National Univ.
Public Univ.
Private Univ.
NAOJ
JAXA
Other Domestic Institution
21
6.0
>=
150
7～
9
10
～
15
16
～
20
8.0
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
4～
6
200
ratio
10.0
1～
3
ratio
0
Accepted
250
00
Number of Proposals
Submittted
number of submitted proposals
Open Use Proposal Statistics
S09A Proposal Statistics
individuals
Foreign Institution
Submitted
Accepted
ratio
200
Probability of Proposed Observations Finally Being Realized
Normal/Intensive Program
Rank A
S04B S05A S05B S06A S06B S07A S07B S08A
La
Lo
rg
ca
eS
l, N
ca
ea
le
rb
y,
St
arb
AG
ur
N
st
an
dQ
G.
..
SO
,Q
SO
Ab
so
r...
Gr
Hi
gh
-z
Cl
us
ter
s,
Ga
la x
ies
,
Co
sm
olo
gy
av
i t,
s,
Mi
l ky
8A
S0
S0
7B
7A
S0
6B
S0
6A
S0
5B
S0
5A
S0
4B
S0
4A
S0
S0
3B
3A
S0
2B
S0
2A
S0
1B
S0
Arrived mails / hour
80
60
40
20
0
9/ 1
9
0
9/ 1
8
Update
30
10
9/ 1
7
Newly Submit
40
20
9/ 1
6
90
%
th
an
m
or
e
～
90 ％
80 ％
～
80 ％
70 ％
～
70 ％
60 ％
～
60 ％
50 ％
～
50 ％
40 ％
～
40 ％
30 ％
～
30 ％
20 ％
～
20 ％
10 ％
an
10 ％
0
100
9/ 1
5
5
120
9/ 1
4
10
50
Newly Submit Update
9/ 1
3
15
140
9/ 1
2
20
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
9/ 1
1
25
60
160
9/ 1
0
domestic
Rank B
8/ 8
～
9/ 1
0
30
Hourly Arrival Rate of S09A Proposal Mails
(On the Deadline Day of 9/19)
Daily Arrival Rate of Proposal Mails
(S09A case: from 8/8 to 9/19)
Arrived mails / day
35
th
1A
Mean Execution Rates of Service Proposals
statistics for 155 applicants who have submitted 5 or more
Subaru proposals (as P.I.) during S00-S09A
le
ss
Submission “Inflation” on the Deadline Day …
Service Program
Histogram of Approval Probability (a) from
the Standpoint of Individual Applicants
foreign
S0
S0
0
0
Co
mp
ac
t
M
St
20
ar
F
So
la r
40
Wa
y
0%
,E
60
Ratio
10%
xtr
as
ola
r
80
20%
tar
100
30%
n,
IS
120
40%
No
rm
al
S
140
50%
or
ma
tio
160
Number of Observers
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
Number of Proposals
180
0-1
1-2
2-3
3-4
4-5
5-6
6-7
7-8
8-9
9-10 10-11 11-12
Time on 9/19 (JST)
Date
a ≡number of accepted proposals / number of submitted
proposals (in which he/she was involved as PI)
People Involving Subaru Open Use
=How the Proposal Selection Proceeds?=
＝Subaru TAC Members＝
Time Schedule for S09B
Kazuhiro Shimasaku (Univ.of Tokyo): Chair
Mamoru Doi (Univ. of Tokyo) : Structure formation and
Preliminary Notice for “S09B Call for Proposals”
January 2009 : Beginning of discussion/decision about the details for the S09B semester
Cosmology
(schedule, instruments to be opened, time exchange program, etc.)
Hideyo Kawakita (Kyoto Sangyo Univ.): Solar system and Extrasolar planets
February 6 (Fri): “Call for Proposals” starts
Tadayuki Kodama (NAOJ): Galaxies and Clusters of galaxies
March 6 (Fri): Deadline for Normal/Intensive program proposals (12:00 JST, Noon)
Takashi Murayama (Tohoku Univ.) : AGN and galaxies
mid- March : Grouping proposals into 7-8 categories (by TAC)
Tetsuya Nagata (Kyoto Univ.) : Star/Planet formation and ISM
Takashi Onaka (Univ. of Tokyo): Stars
Toshikazu Shigeyama (Univ. of Tokyo) : General
Tomonori Totani (Kyoto Univ.) : General
Nomination of referee candidates (by TAC)
(About 5 referees for each category, usually 3 Japanese and 2 foreigners)
mid to late- March: Inquiring each referee candidate whether he/she is willing to accept
(When declined, go to another candidate)
end of March : Sending review forms and proposals to referees
April 10 (Fri) : Deadline for Service program proposals (12:00 JST, noon)
＝Subaru Open Use Team＝
Hideki Takami : negotiation with Gemini/Keck
mid-April : Sending Service proposals to TAC members
late-April : Receiving referee reports
mid-May : Time Allocation Committee (2 days)
Yoichi Takeda : manager of proposal selection procedure
Hearing of Intensive Program proposals
Nobunari Kashikawa : service program, electronic submission
Selection of Normal/Intensive Program proposals based on referee scores
Masatoshi Imanishi : scheduling and time-exchange program
Hiroshi Terada: operation
Yasushi Nakajima : electronic submission
Chie Yoshida : administrative assistant
Tentative time allocation
Ranking of Service proposals
mid to late-May : Preparation for results notification (editing the referee/TAC comments)
Scheduling
by early June : Informing the results of Normal/Intensive Program proposal selection
Announcement of schedule and observing procedure
Informing the results of Service Program proposal selection
August 1: Start of S09B