I F M S - QEM Inc
Download
Report
Transcript I F M S - QEM Inc
©
control
INJURY
Injury Frequency Ratio Management System
QEM Incorporated
©
control
INJURY
Agenda
Opportunity
Present Approaches
QEM Approach
The Process for Improvement
Key Success Factors
Benefits
Partnership for Success
QEM, Inc. -
Who we are…
QEM is a Management Consulting Group with Expertise
in Diverse functional areas. Several of which are highlighted:
Safety
Performance Analysis
Economic Improvement
Security
Transportation
ISO
Manufacturing
Service
QEM is comprised of 100+ senior associates. Each with practical
experience gained when they were responsible for their
area specialty.
QEM is unique in that our experienced associates work with the client
where the issues are - not from some remote office.
The Opportunity….
1
Fatality
3
Debilitating
30
Agency Reportable Injuries
300
Incidents
3,000
Near Misses
Source:National Safety Council
The Opportunity….
1
Fatality
3
Debilitating
Not including incidents
creates a risk analysis gap
that is potentially harmful
to employees,
the organization, and
the community.
30
Agency Reportable Injuries
300
Incidents
3,000
Near Misses
Source:National Safety Council
How do organizations lower IFR?
Most Safety
Programs
are ...
“…REACTIVE”
Managing Safety Performance requires a
Proactive Approach using ...
…to provide a Systematic fact-based process that
predictably measures and consistently reduces IFR at ...
Each location
Each department
Each year
Why
©
control
INJURY ?
Injury Frequency Report
INcontrol Unique Approach
“Lag” Metric
Live Data Statistics
Lost time injuries only
Injuries and Incidents
Not work activity specific
Tracked by natural groups
Not predictive
Highlights “key individuals”
Ineffective improvement tool
Effective Management Tool
You Decide……
Which of these
employees have
injury records that…
...are unacceptable?
…have the highest probability of
injury in the near future?
…require immediate intervention?
Source: Extracted
from actual client data.
Employee
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
Career
Career
Employee
Injuries
Injuries
3
N
3
2
O
2
3
P
1
3
Q
8
3
R
1
4
S
9
2
T
1
2
U
1
2
V
11
3
W
5
2
X
6
2
Y
8
4
Z
6
Answer…...
All of them…..
Why All of Them?
Not all in the same working group
Service time varies
Work history of their respective group varies
control
INJURY
©
Uses statistical data to formulate an
Individual Injury Frequency Rate IIFR©
for each employee
IFRMS© Process
Name
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z
Job
Clerk
Clerk
Clerk
Clerk
Clerk
Clerk
Clerk
Clerk
Clerk
Clerk
Clerk
Clerk
Clerk
Clerk
Engineer
Engineer
Engineer
Engineer
Engineer
Engineer
Engineer
Engineer
Engineer
Engineer
Engineer
Engineer
Inj. Svc
3 276
2 240
3 300
3 324
4 264
2 264
2 216
2 240
3 312
2 240
2 240
4 336
3 228
3 360
5 216
1
36
8 216
9 312
1
24
6 276
6 336
1
24
11 396
8 396
2
24
1
24
IIFR©
IFR
13.59
10.42
12.5
11.57
18.94
9.47
11.57
10.42
12.02
10.42
10.42
14.88
16.45
10.42
28.94
34.72
46.3
36.06
52.08
27.17
22.32
52.08
34.72
25.25
104.17
52.08
©
control
INJURY
How Does it Work?
Individual Injury Frequency Rate (IIFR©)
20
Employee E
Out of
Statistical
Control
15
Upper
Control
Limit
Employee I
10
5
In Control
0
1
3
5
7
Employee E with
144 service months and
4 career injuries,
IIFR© = 18.74
IFRMS© Process
9
11
13
15
17
19
Lower
Control
Limit
Employee I with
267 service months and
4 career injuries,
IIFR© = 12.03
INJURY
©
control
Process
Client Provides
•EE Indentifier # (No Name)
•Occupation/Craft Code
•Service (Mo./Year)
•Injury/Incident Record
QEM, Inc.
processes data
via
INcontrol©
Client Receives
Name
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z
Job
Clerk
Clerk
Clerk
Clerk
Clerk
Clerk
Clerk
Clerk
Clerk
Clerk
Clerk
Clerk
Clerk
Clerk
Engineer
Engineer
Engineer
Engineer
Engineer
Engineer
Engineer
Engineer
Engineer
Engineer
Engineer
Engineer
Inj. Svc
3 276
2 240
3 300
3 324
4 264
2 264
2 216
2 240
3 312
2 240
2 240
4 336
3 228
3 360
5 216
1
36
8 216
9 312
1
24
6 276
6 336
1
24
11 396
8 396
2
24
1
24
IFR
13.59
10.42
12.5
11.57
18.94
9.47
11.57
10.42
12.02
10.42
10.42
14.88
16.45
10.42
28.94
34.72
46.3
36.06
52.08
27.17
22.32
52.08
34.72
25.25
104.17
52.08
IIFR©
Individual
Injury
Frequency
Record
Process Risk Evaluation
Activity Specific
INcontrol©
generates
client
data analysis
reports
20
15
10
5
0
1
3
5
7
9
11
13
15
17
19
IFRMS© Process
People
IIFR© Analysis of
High Probability
Employees for
Immediate
Intervention
Process
Statistically
Arrays
process data
to analyze
process control
©
control
INJURY
People Focus
Process Focus
High Risk Employee
High Risk Work Function
IIFR© Simulation
EAP Presentation
Employee discussion/debrief
Professional Assessment
Recommendations to Management
Professional Assessment
Recommendations to Management
Work Function Specific
Statistically Accurate
Problem Solving Tool
control© Key Success Factors
INJURY
Data Integrity
Natural Work Groups
Simplifying Statistics
Both / And Vs. Either / Or
Third Party Application Session
control©
INJURY
Benefits
Significant Reduction in Injuries/Incidents
Major Costs Reduction for your Department and Organization
Better Resource Allocation for Safety Improvements
Objective Measurements for Better Decision Making
Provides Opportunity to Create Reality Based IFR Goal-Setting
at All Levels
control©
INJURY
Partnership for Success
Company
QEM
Client
Key Responsibilities
INcontrol© Analysis
Review INcontrol © and Commit to Action
Employee Application Sessions
Strategy for Continuous Improvement
Encourage Employee Participation
Continuous Follow-up on Improvement Strategy
Next Step
Let QEM, Incorporated Assist You
in Integrating….
INJURY
©
control
to Enhance Your Safety Program, today.
control©
INJURY
Employees >UCL
One Day INControl© Application Session
– Overview by Senior Manager
– Employee Discussion
– INcontrol© IFR Explanation
– Safety Awareness
– EAP Presentation
– Group Debriefing
Session Summary and Recommendations to
Management