Improving distributed work - Organization Communication 2014

Download Report

Transcript Improving distributed work - Organization Communication 2014

How Can We Support Geographically
Distributed Teams
Virtual teams are often less efficient &
effective than collocated ones
But many can be successful
Boeing-Rocketdyne team was successful
• Small distributed engineering team radically
& successfully redesigned rocket engine
•
•
•
•
Reduced part count fm 1,200 to 6
Reduced first unit cost from $4.5m to $47K
Reduced design time from 6 years to 10 months
Increased quality three orders of magnitude
(from 6 sigma to 9 sigma)
2
What Did the Boeing-Rocketdyne Team Do
To Be Successful?
3
What Did the Boeing-Rocketdyne Team Do
To Be Successful?
• Recruiting: High quality team
• Explicit contracts
• At organizational level – level of effort, intellectual property,
autonomy, budget
• At group level – ways of using technology, amount of & place for
communication, role of leader (all modified with experience)
• Technology
•
•
•
•
•
Voice communication
Data repository
Real-time drawing
Technology facilitator
Modifications of technology & SOP to deal with problems
• Frequent communication
• 2.5 virtual meetings per week
• Data repository
• Combination of documented conceptual sketches + verbal
annotation
4
Communication Intensity
• Compare 3 global teams within
a single company
• 2 effective:
• 1 ineffective
Effective
• Effective teams
• Matched type & duration of
communication sessions with
function/topic & complexity
• Used periodic, face-to-face
meetings to drive function
•
Maznevski, M., & Chudoba, C. (2000). Bridging
space over time: Global virtual team dynamics and
effectiveness. Organization Science, 11(5), 473492.
Effective
In effective
5
What coordination techniques help?
Cummings & Kiesler, 2007, Distributed scientists
6
Appropriate launch activities
• Often helps to start the work with face-toface meeting, with food, time for leisure, etc.
• Goal is to build rapport & short-circuit the
us/them social categorization.
7
Smooze or loose
• Analogous to having a ‘get-to-know-each-other phone
chat’ before email negotiation
• In email negotiation vs face-to-face negotiation, partner
• Less likely to ask questions abt preferences
• Less likely to reveal non-negotiable issues
• Threats, ultimatums and references to obligations were more
likely to result in impass
• But the preliminary phone chat reduced these effects
• Increased rapport
• Reduced likelihood of an impasse
Morris, M., Nadler, J., Kurtzberg, T., & Thompson, L. (2002). Schmooze or lose: Social friction and
lubrication in e-mail negotiations. Group Dynamics, 6(1), 89-100.
8
Reduce Needs for Communication
Stealth Bomber/Boeing 777
• Digitally designed and tested aircraft
• Database of component specifications & designs (CAD)
• Simulations and modeling to test the integration of
independently designed components
• Visualizations to help identify alternative design
9
Consequences
• Digital models increased model precision  increased the “first
fit ratio” from ~50% for conventional aerospace manufacture to
~90%
• Makes the tacit explicit  reduces need for communication
• Reduces likelihood of misunderstanding
• Reduces need for shared knowledge among engineers, typically
developed within-firms
• “Technical grammar” allows coordination without hierarchy
through social convention
• Reduces likelihood of honest mistakes and agency  allows
vertical disintegration
• Reduces lobbying the central authority
10
Agency problems
• The principal–agent problem
• One person (the "agent") is able to make
decisions on behalf of another (the "principal“)
• Agent is motivated to act in his own best interests
rather than those of the principal.
• Occurs when the two parties have different
interests and asymmetric information (the
agent having more information
 Principal cannot guarantee that the agent is
always acting in its (the principal's) best
interests, particularly when activities that are
useful to the principal are costly to the agent
11
Generic Methods for Countering Agency
Problems
• Aligning incentives
• Clan control
• Liking
• Pay for performance
• Control
• Monitoring
• Trust
12
Hudson’s Bay Company
1670-1826
• The challenge
• Owners & headquarters in London
• Local management & work in North America
• Communication restricted to annual ship runs
North American operations had substantial autonomy
• Agency problem
• How to align interests of owners and operators?
• Agency costs definition
• Costs associated with self-interest
• Costs resulting from monitoring & preventing self-interest
13
Map
14
Techniques
• Clan control:
• Selection to get right type of people
• Socialization to develop a company-centric value system
• Transition rite of passages on leaving England & arrive in new world
• Total institutions
• Onboard ship
• In posts
• Promotion from within
• Communication
• Annual letters
• Detailed daily journals (like ship logs), with more detail after post fire
• Lists to make important information more salient: supplies, personnel,
salaries, movements, expentitures, disciplinary actions,
• Active management by senior managers (governor) in Canada
• Longevity
• Wandering around
15
Surveillance Reduces Agency
Conflicts
• Both knowledge that
actions are visible &
self-monitoring can
increase compliance to
norms
Guard tour patrol system
Body-worn police camera
16
Police & body-worn cameras
• Police wearing body-worn cameras reduces
frequency of police use of force against public
• Year experiment with Rialto CA Police reduced use of
force by 50% (17 to 8 incidents)
17
Alternate: Use Technology to Increase Monitoring
•Portholes
•Ms Fields: Point of sales terminal connected to central office;
Monitoring & detailed feedback  tight reign
18
Summary: Improve Success of Distributed
Work By
•
•
•
•
Reducing needs for direct communication
Using appropriate launch activities
Increasing communication intensity
Developing tools for Awareness
• Task state
• Participant state
• Increase quality of communication sessions
• Develop contracts with clear expectations
19