Transcript PowerPoint 簡報

HOW DO SMARTPHONE INFLUENCE
STUDENT’S SOCIAL LIFE –
KAOHSIUNG COLLEGE STUDENTS'
SMARTPHONE USE & SOCIAL COMMUNICATION
IVY WU 1101100015
OUTLINE
 Introduction
 Literature Review
 Methodology
 Result & Discussion
 Conclusion
INTRODUCTION
Smartphone penetration rate in Taiwan
120%
100%
99%
80%
60%
51%
40%
20%
26%
32%
0%
2011
2012
2013
2014
From Google company & Global Views Magazine(遠見雜誌)
INTRODUCTION
1. what drives students to use smartphone
( the main reasons & functions)
2. do these well-being condition continually transform to the
disability to communicate with people face to face &
do they improve the relationship quality?
LITERATURE REVIEW
 “communication is one of the most basic parts for the
adolescents since it is the foundation of the strong and
positive interpersonal relationship ”
(Muuss, 1996)
 In Andrew K. Przybylski and Netta Weinstein’s research
(2012) pointed out that smartphone can hurt people’s
relationship
closeness
connection
Conversation quality
LITERATURE REVIEW
the authors grouped the needs into six factors
(Namsu Park and Hyunjoo Lee’s study, 2011)
information
Following popular
trend
accessibility
Communication
Caring for others
Passing time
Caring for others
METHODOLOGY
Paper survey
120 Participants (101 valid, 19 invalid)
Data collected in two weeks
• ( between 9th February 2014 and 22nd February 2014)
26 Q was rated on a Likert scale that range from
strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (5).
• first 18 Q is to classify the factors into five sections
• 8 statements to find out the different communication
method.
RESULT & DISCUSSION
RQ1
Chatting application (Line, what’s app…)
for the 1st grade ,2nd and 3rd grade
Photographic
for the 4th grade
The functions were over 50 %were consider the
useful function students usually use (Graph 1).
RESULT & DISCUSSION
RQ1
Five factors of the motives student use smartphone
information
accessibility
Passing time
Following popular trend
Caring for others
RESULT & DISCUSSION
RQ2
Q19 Checking the message on the
smartphone is a good idea to keep
frequency
Percentage%
yes
65
64.3
neutral
22
21.8
no
14
13.9
yes
56
55.4
neutral
26
25.7
no
19
18.9
distraction at the moment
Q22 I will like to talk to the
stranger first
RESULT & DISCUSSION
RQ2
Q19 I would like to get to know the
stranger
Q22 I can know more about this
person and see if we can be friends
frequency
Percentage%
yes
55
54.5
neutral
31
30.6
no
15
55
29
17
68
20
13
14.9
54.4
28.7
16.9
67.3
19.8
12.9
21
48
32
20.8
47.5
31.7
yes
neutral
no
QX Smartphone allow you to keep in
touch with newly met people
yes
neutral
no
QX I will want to leave the room as
soon as possible
yes
neutral
no
CONCLUSION
1. what drives students to use smartphone
• five factors of the intentions of smartphone use
• the result indicated communicate via smartphone already become
students’ mainly social communication method.
2. do these well-being condition continually transform to the
disability to communicate with people face to face?
• using smartphones would not cause the disability of communication
with people face to face.
• highly involved with using smartphone to stay connected with
friends and family.
THANK YOU!
GRAPH 1
The functions were over 50% were voice call, camera, multimedia,
SNS by facebook or Twitter, chatting application, internet search &
surfing
METHODOLOGY
1
run the Cronbach Analysis
2
run the frequency count
get the percentage and the mean or
average
3
Third, ran the Cross-tabs
find out the functions have used most
frequently.
Fourth, run the correlation
see the relationship of the variables
between each other.
(Spearman Correlation tells the
strength of every relationship. )
4
test the internal consistency