Chapter Nine
Download
Report
Transcript Chapter Nine
Conflict
Management
Processes
Chapter 9
Assumptions
Harmony is normal and conflict is abnormal.
Conflict and disagreements are the same
thing.
Conflict is just a break down of
communication.
Conflict should never be escalated & always
avoided.
Conflict mang. should be orderly & polite.
Assumptions
Anger and hostility are the predominate
emotion.
One should fine the “right” way to
resolve conflict.
Conflict is always bad.
Manage means to suppress, ignore, or
avoid.
Other assumptions about conflict?
Metaphors…conflict is:
Limiting
– Warlike and violent, explosive
– A trial, struggle, messy
– Animal behavior
Neutralizing
– A game
– Heroic adventure
– Balancing act
Expanding Potential
– Bargaining table, a tide, dance, garden
Conflict
The interaction of interdependent people who
perceive opposition of goals, aims, and
values and who see the other party as
potentially interfering w/ the realization of
those goals. (Putnam & Poole)
Key components (4 I’s)
–
–
–
–
Incompatible (multiple levels)
Interdependence (only when conflict can arise)
Interaction (expression of conflict)
Interference (perceived and real)
Levels of Conflict
Interpersonal- individuals perceive goal
incompatibility (intra-group)
Intergroup- considers the
disagreements of people in parties with
in an organization, ex. Departments
Interorganizational- disputes between
two or more organizations
How does conflict manifest itself
if improperly managed?
Competition
Disputes
Decreased satisfaction
Inefficiency
Low morale
Sabotage
W/holding information
Others?????
Phases of Conflict
Latent-grounds for conflict exist among
individuals in interdep. relationships
Perceived-one or more of parts. Realize their
situation (incomp. & interdep.)
Felt-personalize perceived conflict by
focusing on conflict issue & planning
response strategies
Manifest-participants enact conflict through
communication
Aftermath-short & long term effects on
individual, relationship, & organization
Conflict Styles
Managerial Grid (p. 163)-predisposition
to handling conflict situations that lead
to specific strategies
– Concern for self
– Concern for others
5 Conflict Styles
– Avoidance
– Accommodating
– Compromise
– Collaboration
– Competition
T/K Model of Conflict
Management Styles
Serves as a nice entry point
Conflict management is not static but
dynamic
Organizations are systems – that styles are
not isolated
My perception of mine might be different from
your perception of my style
Conflict mgmt. is process oriented
Styles and tactics are contextual
Critique of TK Grid
Treats the individual communicator as
the sole benchmark for conflict
Not just 2 dimensional
Downplay importance of NV and
irrational communication
Ignores context (organization, task,
relationship)
Activity
TK Conflict Style Instrument
– (on Assignment Page)
– Check out your predisposition
– How do you deal with conflict?
Kinds of Bargaining
Distributive
– Conflicting parties try to maximize their
own goals and minimize their own losses
– Centers on limited resources that must be
divided (ex. Wages, benefits)
– Communication is marked by withheld
information, and deception
Kinds of Bargaining
Integrative
– Conflicting parties are trying to maximize
gains for both parties
– Bargainers discuss issues that would lead
to a more creative solution
– Communication is marked by open
disclosure, careful listening, and multiple
communication channels
Refer to “Case in Point: Working with
Jerks”(p. 166)
3rd Party Conflict
Resolution
Managerial Conflict Resolution (p. 168)
Outside Conflict Resolution (mediation)
– Direct tactics
– Non-direct tactics
– Procedural tactics
– Reflexive tactics
Influencing Factors
Personal (limited impact)
– Personality (plays small role)
– Gender (research contradicts stereotypical
expectations) (p. 170)
– Framing (Spotlight on Scholarship-p. 171)
Relational
– Hierarchical position
– Co-orientation
• Agreement
• Accuracy
• Perceived accuracy
Cultural
– Communication channels & support
– Climate
Communication Climates
(Gibbs)
Defensive
Evaluation
Control
Strategy
Neutrality
Superiority
Certainty
Supportive
Description
Problem orientation
Spontaneity
Equality
Empathy
Provisionalism
Organizational Climate
A relatively enduring quality of the internal
environment of an organization that is
Perceived & experienced by its members
Influences their behavior
Can be described in terms of the values of a
particular set of characteristics of the
organization (such as responsibility,
standards, reward, team spirit) (Tagiuri)
The perceived quality of relationships &
communication in the organization; the
degree of involvement & influence(Redding)
What to do?
Check perception
Clarify communication
Advice from “Working Wounded” (Bob
Rosner)
Change strategies
Defuse or reduce anxiety of moment
Consider third party intervention
– Traditional vs. Alternative Model (p. 174)
Passive-aggressive article (additional
readings)
Give up/walk away?!?!?!?!
Crucial Conversations
Grenny, McMillan, Patterson, & Switzler (2002).
Crucial Conversations: Tools for talking when
the stakes are high.
A discussion b/w two or more people
where the stakes are high (high risks),
options vary, and emotions run strong
(relative to the individuals FOE,
relationship, tolerance)
The path to high productivity passes
not through static systems but through
f2f conversations at all levels.
HOW DO WE TYPICALLY HANDLE
CRUCIAL CONVERSATIONS?
We can avoid them
We can face them and handle them
poorly
We can face them and handle them well
Other ways? How do you handle
“crucial conversations” in your life
especially the workplace?
SOME COMMON CRUCIAL
CONVERSATIONS
Ending a relationship
Talking to a coworker who behaves
offensively or makes suggestive
comments
Asking a friend to repay a loan
Giving a boss feedback about her
behavior
Taking to a team member who isn’t
keeping commitments
SOME COMMON CRUCIAL
CONVERSATIONS
Approaching a boss who is breaking his
own safety or quality policies
Critiquing a colleague’s work
Asking a roommate to move out
Resolving custody or visitation issues
with an ex-spouse
Dealing w/ a rebellious teen
SOME COMMON CRUCIAL
CONVERSATIONS
Discussing problems w/ sexual intimacy
Confronting a loved one about a substance
abuse problem
Talking to a colleague who is hoarding
information or resources
Giving an unfavorable performance review
Asking in-laws to quit interfering
Talking to a coworker about a personal
hygiene problem
How to Deal with Crucial
Conversations? Solving Problems by
Categorization
Safety. When someone violates some sort
of safety policy, the very first person to see
this violation proceeds with a crucial
conversation.
Diversity. When someone feels offended
they discuss the issue with the person
acting in an offending manor.
Productivity. Affected parties immediately
address problems of productivity.
How to Deal with Crucial
Conversations? Solving Problems by
Categorization
Quality. Discuss the problem face to face
when it first arises.
Every other hot topic. Companies who
are the best at what they do are also the
best at crucial conversations.
Summary: Address your problem when it
first presents itself, instead of dealing with
it later when it has had the potential to
overwhelm employees.
Spotlight on Scholarship
Making Sense (p. 171)
Intractable conflict
Conflict frames
– Identity frames
– Characterization frames
– Conflict management frames
Approaches to Process
?????? How conflict mang. would be
considered by these different approaches:
Classical
Human Relations
Human Resources
Systems
Cultural
Critical