Eisenhower and The New Look
Download
Report
Transcript Eisenhower and The New Look
"There is one solution and only one: that is for the
free world to develop the will and organize the
means to retaliate instantly against open
aggression by Red armies, so that, if it occurred
anywhere, we could and would strike back where
it hurts, by means of our choosing."
NSC-68
Defending the western hemisphere and essential allied areas in
order that their war-making capabilities can be developed
Providing and protecting a mobilization base while the offensive
forces required for victory were being built up;
Conducting offensive operations to destroy vital elements of the
Soviet war-making capacity, and to keep the enemy off balance
until the full offensive strength of the United States and its allies
can be brought to bear;
Defending and maintaining the lines of communication and base
areas necessary to the execution of the above tasks; and
Providing such aid to allies as is essential to the execution of
their role in the above tasks.
Korean War
Massive troop build up
Trying to rebuild after the ‘peace dividend’ of WWII
Massive casualties
The poorly trained and initially poorly equipped Americans
fell pray to a disciplined, Soviet supported North Korean
force
Then the Chinese entered as U.S. forces approached the Yalu
Massive expense
See next slide
Limited success
North Korea is still Communist (your fault Lanie)
National Defense Budget 1947 - 1960
How do we save money?
The New Look
A movement away from the idea of a traditional
standing army
In order to reduce costs, a small standing army and
navy combined with a GIANT Air Force
Every incident would necessitate a nuclear response
This was tested in a couple of incidents immediately
Dien Bien Phu and Hungary
The Gutless Frogs decide that a base in the valley of a giant
ravine is the best place to defend and make their last stand in
Vietnam
Mortar shells from the surrounding mountains easily pummel
them into submission (not that a good firm tone of voice
wouldn’t have accomplished the same)
The French need to be airlift rescued out of Dien Biien Phu
and this ends the occupation of “French Indochina”
The Godless Commies invade Hungary in 1956 to quell a
revolt and impose control
A student led protest was crushed by the Soviets.
They install a pro-Soviet government that crushed dissent by
1957
The ‘New’ New Look
Finalized in December of 1954, NSC 5440 was the
first step towards the policy that would be known as
‘flexible response’
The goal was still to get economies of scale with the
use of a deterrent nuclear arsenal
However, a mixed of policy options would become
ever more ready to respond to a rapidly changing
world
Let’s take a look at NSC 5440, shall we
NSC 5440
The ability to apply force selectively and flexibly will become
increasingly important in maintaining the morale and will of the
free world to resist aggression. As the fear of nuclear war grows,
the United States and its allies must never allow themselves to
get into the position where they must choose between (a) not
responding to local aggression and (b) applying force in a way
which our own people or our allies would consider entails
undue risk of nuclear devastation. However, the United States
cannot afford to preclude itself from using nuclear weapons
even in a local situation, if such use. . . will best advance U.S.
security interests. In the last analysis, if confronted by the choice
of (a) acquiescing in Communist aggression or (b) taking
measures risking either general war or loss of allied support, the
United States must be prepared to take these risks if necessary
for its security
Importance for Latin America?
Rio Pact
In light of the developing Cold War and following the
statement of the Truman Doctrine, the US wished to make
those new anti-communist commitments permanent.
The Inter-American Treaty of Reciprocal Assistance was
the first of many so-called 'mutual security agreements
The treaty was adopted by the original signatories on
September 2, 1947 in Rio De Janeiro
Guatemala 1954
Jacobo Arbenz Guzmán, elected president of Guatemala, introduces land reform and
seizes some idle lands of United Fruit proposing to pay for them the value United
Fruit claimed on its tax returns. (PS– CIA Director Allen Dulles is on the Board of
Directors of United Fruit)
The CIA (led by Director Allen Dulles) organizes a small force to overthrow him and
begins training it in Honduras.
When Arbenz naively asks for U.S. military help to meet this threat, he is refused
When he buys arms from Czechoslovakia it only proves he's a Dirty Communist.
Guatemala is "openly and diligently toiling to create a Communist state in Central America... only
two hours' bombing time from the Panama Canal." --Life
The CIA broadcasts reports detailing the imaginary advance of the "rebel army," and
provides planes to strafe the capital. The army refuses to defend Arbenz, who
resigns.
The U.S.'s hand-picked dictator, Carlos Castillo Armas, outlaws political parties,
reduces the franchise, and establishes the death penalty for strikers, as well as
undoing Arbenz's land reform.
"This is the first instance in history where a Communist government has been replaced by a free
one." --Richard Nixon
The Rio Pact
The treaty was invoked again in supporting the United States' naval
blockade unanimously during the Cuban Missile Crisis.
During the Falklands War (Malvinas in Spanish), the United States,
who is committed to the Rio Treaty as well as NATO, arguing that
Argentina was the aggressor, favored the Great Britain, as did Chile
and Colombia.
This was seen by Latin American countries as the final failure of the
treaty.
In 2001, the United States invoked the Rio Treaty after September 11th
but all Latin American democracies declined to join the "War on
Terror" actively.
In September 2002, citing the Falklands example and anticipating the
Iraq War, Mexico formally withdrew from the treaty; after the
requisite two years, Mexico ceased to be a signatory in September 2004
Containment?
Note that NSC 5440 does not reject the idea of
containment
It actually enhances the American responsibility for
the ‘free world to resist aggression”
Also note the tones of a more global ‘Roosevelt
Corollary’