SEREX screening for colorectal cancer antigens
Download
Report
Transcript SEREX screening for colorectal cancer antigens
SEREX Screening for
Colorectal Cancer Antigens
Jennifer Newton, MD
April 5, 2011
Research Presentation
Colorectal Cancer (CRC)
Jemal, A. et al. CA Cancer J Clin 2010;60:277-300.
Objectives for the Research Block
Collaborate with TVG to create a MultiAntigen Vaccine to prevent CRC
– Identify potential immunogenic CRC antigens
– Verify cancer-specificity
– Purify and Isolate the antigens
– Sequence the antigens
– Literature review
Rationale
CRC is immunogenic
Th1-type immune response is associated
with improved prognosis
Suggests CRC-specific Th1 immunity may
prevent disease or disease recurrence
HYPOTHESIS
Certain CRC antigens may trigger a Th1
immune response that could be used to develop
a multi-antigen vaccine
Rationale
Methodology validated in breast cancer
Disis ML, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:2624-32.
X
X
Disis ML, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:4685-92.
SEREX
Serological Analysis of Recombinant
cDNA Expression Libraries
Testis/Tumor
+
XL Blue
E.coli
mRNA
30 min
at 41 C
cDNA
5 hours
at 41 C
+ top agar
NZY Agar
λ-phage cDNA library
+ IPTG-soaked
Nitrocellulose
membrane
SEREX
overnight
at 37 C
Wash & Block
Membrane
Immunoscreening with
cancer mice sera
Expression of antigen protein
and transfer to membrane
+ AP-GoatAnti-Mouse
IgG
+ NBTBCIP
Incubation with
secondary antibody
Color Development
Primary
Screening
SEREX
Immunoscreening with
CANCER mice sera
Secondary
Screening
Immunoscreening with
CONTROL mice sera
Mouse Models
Serum
– AOM-induced tumor in FVB mice
– APC/Min in Black6 mice
– Rejection Sera: MC38 injected in FVB mice
λ-phage cDNA libraries
– Mouse-testis
– MC38 tumor cell line
– APC tumor
– AOM tumor
SEREX Data…aka “what did I do
for 8 weeks???”
Primary Screening: 215 membranes and
955,000 plaques
– cDNA libraries
Mouse Testis: 515,000 plaques
MC38: 300,000 plaques
APC-F12B: 140,000 plaques
– Sera
AOM: 470,000 plaques
APC: 295,000 plaques
FVB-MC38 Rejection: 190,000 plaques
Results
APC Sera & Mouse Testis cDNA
SEREX Data
Secondary Screening
– 48 clones
– 15 positive results
Single-clone Excision, PCR & Sequencing
– No positive results
Results
Clones #1-4
#1
#3
#2
#4
TF3-32 #2 1:100
SCE
PCR
Future Projects
Screen AOM sera against AOM tumor cDNA
library
Screen additional APC/APC & MC38/Rejection
Trial of varying dilutions for APC & Rejection
Sera
Using anti-IgA secondary Antibody
Create mouse-vaccine model using peptides
from literature review
Human CRC SEREX
Acknowledgements
Special Thanks
– TVG
– Elizabeth Broussard, MD
– Mei Wu, PhD
– Erik Espling
References
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Jemal A, et al. Cancer Statistics, 2010. CA Cancer J Clin. 2010 SepOct;60(5):277-300.
Galon J, et al. Type, density and location of immune cells within human colorectal
tumors predict clinical outcome. Science 313, (2006);1960-64.
Pages F, et al. Effector Memory T cells, Early Metastasis, and Survival in
Colorectal Cancer. N Engl J Med 2005;353:2654-66.
Pages F, et al. Immune infiltration in human tumors: a prognostic factor that
should not be ignored. Oncogene 2010;29:1093-1102.
Disis ML, et al. Generation of T-cell immunity to the HER-2/neu protein after active
immunization with HER-2/neu peptide-based vaccines. J Clin Oncol.
2002;20:2624-32.
Knutson KL, et al. Immunization with a HER-2/neu peptide vaccine generates
HER-2/neu CD8 T-cell immunity in cancer patients. J Clin Invest. 2001;107:47784.
Goodell V, et al. Level of HER-2/neu protein expression in breast cancer may
affect the development of endogenous HER-2/neu-specific immunity. Mol Cancer
Ther. 2008;7:449-54.
Disis ML, et al. Concurrent trastuzumab and HER2/neu-specific vaccination in
patients with metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:4685-92.
Modifications
AOM: no positive results
– Varying dilutions of sera
– 0, 1, and 2 –times Pseudoscreening
Secondary Screening
– 1:100 dilutions
Stopped Pseudoscreening Sera
Results
AOM Sera & Mouse Testis Library
– Few positive results on Primary Screen
– No positive results on Secondary Screen
Results – PCR
(Courtesy of Erik)
3.0
2.0
1.5
1.0