Transcript Document
Factors
Influencing
Respondent &
Operant Learning
Lesson 6
Respondent & Operant Together
SD :
B
CS :
SR
US
CR
UR
Associative Learning & Language
Language acquisition
Interaction of nature & nurture
Respondent & operant
Respondent
Association of sounds & symbols
English: “deh” = d;
“err” = r
Russian: “deh” = д; “err” = р ~
Respondent Learning & Language
Associatе sounds/symbols with
objects/actions
English:
dog;
woman;
speak
Spanish: perro;
mujer;
hablar
Russian: собака; женщина, говорить
Words/ideas
Conditional stimuli
Conditional responses ~
Operant Learning & Language
Babies start off babbling sounds
Inherited behavior
Certain sounds are reinforced
Directly by parents, etc.
Also by consequences
words are understood consequences
Mother ~
Respondent vs Operant
Both associative
Involuntary vs voluntary
Biologically important events
R
US vs S
Signals/cues
D
CS vs S
Contingency
R
~
CS : US vs B S
Factors Influencing Acquisition
Frequency
# learning trials
Predictivity
contingency & probability
Contiguity
timing
Salience
Intensity / novelty ~
Acquisition: Frequency
Gradual
usually requires many pairings
Respondent:
CS : US UR
Operant:
SD : B SR
Measuring the learned response
magnitude
latency / probability / frequency
Asymptote
limit to how much can be learned ~
Respondent
Acquisition
CS : US UR
CR
Hi
Asymptote
CR
Strength
Lo
CS : US pairings
Operant
Acquisition
SD : B SR
Hi
Asymptote
Bar
Press
Rate
(B)
Lo
B SR Trials
Acquisition:
Detour Learning Task
Acquisition: Detour Learning
Chicks performance on detour learning task
FIGURE 1
Males
Mean Latency to Social Contact
350
300
Strangers
Cagemates
250
200
150
100
50
0
1
2
3
Detour Learning Trial
4
Acquisition: Predictivity
Contingency
CS+ / CSD
∆
S / S
Probability
Usefulness of cues
Hi faster learning
Low slower learning ~
Contiguity: Respondent Learning
Order & Timing
Anticipate important event
strongest to weakest CR
CS
Delayed
US
CS
Trace
US
Contiguity: Respondent Learning
Simultaneous
Backward
CS
US
CS
US
Contiguity: Respondent Learning
CS-US interval
In general...
shorter interval more effective
longer interval less effective
Depends on response system
Fast: .5 - 2 seconds)
e.g.,
Slow: 2-3 min
e.g.,
eye blink, skeletal muscle reflexes
CERs, physiological responses
Nausea (CTA): hours ~
Contiguity: Operant Learning
Delay of Reinforcement
Immediate consequences most effective
temporal contiguity
reinforcement & punishment
longer delays:
probability of other behaviors being
reinforced
instead of intended behavior ~
Delay of Reinforcement
20
Bar presses
per minute
15
10
5
0
0
20
40
60
Delay between B and SR (sec)
Salience: Operant Learning
SD / S∆ intensity
More noticeable faster learning
SR intensity
Magnitude of reinforcement
magnitude faster learning
SR value
value faster learning ~
Operant: Delay vs Magnitude
Delay most important factor
Small, immediate reinforcer more
powerful…
Than large, delayed reward
Immediate consequences
More closely connected to situation
e.g., hangovers as punishment ~
Salience: CS Intensity
CS intensity
intensity
Faster conditioning ~
Hi
stronger CS
Asymptote
CR
weaker CS
Lo
# of CS - US pairings
Salience: US Intensity
Increased intensity
Faster conditioning and…
Stronger CR possible
Raise
Asymptote ~
Salience: US Intensity
Hi
stronger US
Asymptote
CR
weaker US
Lo
# of CS - US pairings
Salience: Novelty
Surprisingness of US important
Novel stimuli best cues
D / S∆
CS+ / CS- and S
Not cues for other
R
only occur with US/S
Latent Inhibition
Slower acquisition if CS is familiar
Cues associated w/ other events
R ~
Inhibits association w/ new US/S
Conditioned Taste Aversion (CTA)
Exception to usual rules of conditioning
Delay can be hours
Requires only single CS-US pairing
Adaptive ~
Conditioned Taste Aversions
Learn to avoid foods that make you sick
Eat a novel food
Taste = CS
Become sick
Avoid food
Resistant to extinction ~