History Through Literature
Download
Report
Transcript History Through Literature
History Through Literature
UNIT 2
CHAPTER 5: GRANT AND RECONSTRUCTION
Grant
From Ohio
Graduated from West Point (middle of class)
Good horsemen
Sent to infantry in Mexican War
Left army before court-martialed – alcohol
Worked in father’s leather store in Galena
Civil War started – great!
Bad Grant
Butcher Grant
Scandal
Drinking, recklessness, disregarded the lives of his
troops
Corrupt administrations
Abandoned the newly freed African Americans
Native Americans – turned over to Christians dogooders
Turned Republican party of common man, slaves,
and Lincoln into the party of big business
Grant the General
Only General that beat Robert E. Lee
Losses were regrettable
After WWI – butcher again
Everything is expendable, so long as you win
Goal was not to annihilate the Rebels, but to force
them to lay down their arms and rejoin the Union.
Johnson and the Radicals
Fought over reconstruction
Johnson lenient towards Southerners
Radicals , wants suffrage towards Freemen
1867 – Radicals take over Congress – impeach
Johnson – survives by one vote
Radical Reconstruction begins
Ku Klux Klan
Scottish
Founded in Tennessee in 1866
African Americans subject to random terror
Wanted to replace Freemen with Confederates in
local governments
Operated at night – lynching, murder, arson, rape,
whipping, mutilation, and economic coercion
Terrorize Blacks who would be leaders
Grant to the rescue
Only ran because he thought he had to save the
Union – very splintered
Goal was to bring peace and rights for citizens to
blacks – found out he couldn’t do both.
Grant as President
Grant and Civil Rights
1871 got passed the Ku Klux Act in response to the KKK
attacking South Carolina’s state government (first ever
Civil Rights Act)
Sent 16 companies of troops to South Carolina
Threatened to send more troops – violence subsided
1874 – riots broke out in New Orleans – again threatened
to send troops – worked
Grant damned no matter what he did. If he supported
the blacks – charged with promoting the Republican
party. If he did nothing, then only whites would vote and
vote all Democrat and the blacks would be up the creek.
Sheridan
In December of 1874 – New Orleans flared up again
Sent Sheridan to take care of it
Sheridan took on the “White League” and wanted
them declared banditti and tried in military courts
Congress was outraged (Democrats had taken
control) – Grant defended himself, allowed Sheridan
to do his work, but never again sent troops into the
South.
The End
Election of 1876 Samuel Tilden and Rutherford
Hayes
Hayes could be president if the North removed
troops, the south promised not to use force to make
Tilden President and to treat the freemen
“humanely.”
The Republicans gave up on the Freeman to keep the
Presidency
Ambrose
Whished he would have wrote a book on Grant
Next President to send troops to the south for Civil
rights was Eisenhower in 1957 to enforce Brown v.
Board of Education
Tried to do more for blacks then any President until
LBJ in the 60’s. Only time Grant every gave up.
“Failures have been errors of judgment, not of
intent”
He was a great American who did far more good for
our country that most generals or Presidents can
even approach.
Read
Read in the Kennedy book – pages 504-511
Is there a big difference between Kennedy and
Ambrose? Explain some differences.
Is Kennedy bias? Give some adjectives.
Is there two different sets of history for Grant?