Learning to Listen Sounds
Download
Report
Transcript Learning to Listen Sounds
Educational Audiology
Audiologic Rehabilitation for Children and Educational Audiology
SPA 6581 – Spring 2015
Lecture Date: 03/24/15
Educational Audiology
The practice of audiology in educational or school settings
Topics
Educational Audiology
Association
Student Counseling and
Self-Advocacy
Roles and Responsibilities
of Educational Audiologists
Hearing Loss Prevention
The Cross-Check Principle
in Educational Audiology
Classroom Acoustics
Case Management and
Habilitation
Educational
Considerations for Students
Who Are Deaf and Hard of
Hearing
Where Are We Headed?
Numbers…
State
2006-2007 Estimated
Population
# of Audiologists
Employed
Alabama
754,110
21
Arizona
1,076,801
63
Arkansas
461,752
4
Florida
2,669,242
60
Hawaii
184,996
0
Mississippi
507,977
1
Oklahoma
588,016
5
Rhode Island
159,214
0
Texas
4,240,524
40
EAA recommends target ratio of one full-time
educational audiologist for every 10,000 students
What could influence the need for adjusting this ratio?
Geographical coverage and Extensive travel time
Number of students with hearing loss beyond the expected
prevalence
Support: secretarial, scheduling, computer
Time-intensive services
Direct intervention
Services to infants, toddlers, and students with multiple
disabilities
Service provision to regional or self-contained programs
designed for multiple students who are DHH
Educational Audiology
Association
EAA
International organization
Audiologists and related professionals
“The mission of the EAA is to act as the primary resource
and as an active advocate for its members through its
publications and products, continuing educational
activities, networking opportunities, and other
professional endeavors.”
Resources
Educational Audiology Association: Educational
Audiologists and Cochlear Implants
Educational Audiology Association: Minimum
Competencies for Educational Audiologists
Educational Audiology Association: Recommended
Professional Practices for Educational Audiology
Educational Audiology Association: Guidelines of the
Consensus Panel on Support Personnel in Audiology
Roles and Responsibilities of
Educational Audiologists
Roles of Educational Audiologists
Vary depending on other services and personnel
available to assist children within the school system
Educational audiologists are a member of the
educational team
Traditional Audiological Activities
Service Coordinator
Instructional Team Member
Consultant
Educational Audiologists as Service
Coordinators
Service coordinator
When a student with a hearing loss is not receiving any direct
special education services
When a student with a hearing loss is receiving multiple special
education services
Audiologist is the individual responsible for monitoring and
managing the educational program for the student, in order
to provide appropriate services and classroom
accommodations
Routine diagnostic audiology services
Works with general and special education teachers
Works with student, parents, and other relevant individuals
Educational Audiologists as Service
Coordinators Continued
Service coordinator responsibilities (English, 1995):
Prepare teachers and other
service provides to work with
students with hearing loss
Ensure that all appropriate
services (e.g., SLP, OT, etc.)
are coordinated and
implemented in a timely
fashion
Provide ongoing support to
teachers and other school
staff
Monitor student progress
Monitor student placement and
make recommendations for
review and further assessment if
needed
Support transitions to other
grades, schools, and programs
Maintain complete and
accurate information regarding
placement options within the
local education agency (LEA),
as well as those in the region
and state
Educational Audiologists as
Instructional Team Members
Audiologist provides
support to the:
“Support?”
Special education teacher
Assessment of the hearing loss
General education
teacher
Other related service
professionals
Student
Parents
Understanding of the hearing
loss
Management of amplification
and the student’s learning
environment to ensure
communication accessibility
Direct habilitation
In-service
Consultation
Educational Audiologists as
Consultants
May provide consultations to ALL teacher, includes those who may
not have children with identified hearing losses in their classrooms
Teachers may request the following:
Information about a child’s hearing sensitivity or auditory processing
ability
Activities for improving their students’ listening skills
Information about how to integrate and reinforce specific auditory skills
into the classroom curricula
Classroom presentations related to the function of the ear, hearing loss,
hearing loss prevention, or deaf culture
Information about classroom acoustics
Assistance with the use of classroom amplification systems
Suggestions for classroom accommodations for standardized testing, as
well as general instruction
Educational Audiologists in Schools
for the Deaf
Their role may be limited community support and collaborations rather than screening
and identification.
Schools for the deaf are typically structured around a Deaf culture environment
Why?
Requires a unique sensitivity to issues which may not be encountered in public school programs
Main goal?
Still maximizing audition and listening
These audiologists may have to be more creative in designing environments for students to use
and practice these skills
May have more of an opportunity to provide habilitation
What about all of the cochlear implant recipients?
Audiologists are a critical resource to help design communication strategies and structure learning
in the classroom to maximize outcomes for students
Responsibilities of Educational
Audiologists
Responsibilities may overlap with other school staff
(nurses, SLPs, counselors, teachers of the deaf)
Identification
Hearing loss prevention
Assessment
Counseling and guidance
Habilitation
Amplification, cochlear
implants, and other
assistive technology
Responsibilities of Educational
Audiologists
Identification
Assessment
Collaborate with community
resources to promote awareness
of hearing loss, its implications,
and programs and services to
support children with hearing
loss and their families
Select and maintain audiometric
equipment
Provide comprehensive assessments
Analyze classroom noise and acoustics
Establish, administer, and
coordinate programs to identify
disorders of hearing and
auditory processing
Assess central auditory function
Provide written & verbal interpretation of
assessment, functional implications, and
management recommendations
Make appropriate referral for further
audiological, communication,
educational, psychosocial, and medical
assessments
Train and supervise auditory
support personnel
What is an Educationally
Significant Hearing Loss (ESHL)?
Any hearing loss that potentially interferes with access to classroom instruction &
impacts a child’s ability to communicate, learn, and develop peer relationships.
Responsibilities: Habilitation
Recommend methods for improving acoustic accessibility in the learning
environment
Plan and implement programs related to the care and use of amplification,
cochlear implants, and other technology
Provide support and training to facilitate auditory skill development
Develop and implement treatment plans to facilitate communication
competence using speechreading, auditory skill development, communication
repair strategies, and other visual support and technology
Collaborate with other service providers in selection of appropriate materials
Recommend classroom accommodations and instructional modifications to
facilitate access to the students’ communication and learning environments
Serve as a member of the IFSP and IEP, and instructional teams responsible for
educational plans for children with hearing loss
Responsibilities
Hearing Loss
Prevention
Establish, manage, and
implement hearing
conservation programs
within the school
environment
Provide for education
about and access to
hearing protection devices
Amplification, CIs, etc.
Evaluate, select, and fit HAT
Ensure proper fit and
functioning of HAs, CIs,
BAHA, and HAT in the
educational environment
Collaborate with CI centers
concerning the evaluation
and management of
students considering or using
cochlear implants
Responsibilities
Counseling & Guidance
Provide information related to the implications and impact
of hearing loss to families, caregivers, and students
Provide support to students, parents, and caregivers related
tot eh educational and psychosocial aspects of hearing loss
Provide information to assist students with hearing loss to
network with other students with and without hearing
difficulties
Facilitate communication among families of children and
youth with hearing loss
Make appropriate referrals to address counseling needs
beyond the student’s hearing loss
Ethical Considerations
Compliance with federal and state laws, regulations, and policies
Relations among private and educational audiologists related to
the dispensing and management of technology
Issues of confidentiality
Conflicts of interest
Restrictions on information provided to families and caregivers
Referral procedures
Perceived pressures to compromise recommendations for or
against services and technology
Educational Audiology Service
Delivery Models
School Based
Contractual Agreement
Combined School-Based & Contractual Agreement
Telepractice
Educational Audiology Service
Delivery Models
School Based
This model is effective only
if the audiologist’s
caseload is reasonable
Contractual
Agreement
May be less costly and the only
means of obtaining audiological
services in small or rural districts
Many districts limits services in their
contracts so that the majority of the
services related to the educational
support for students with hearing loss
are addressed minimally, if at all.
Audiologists should emphasize to
administrators that a full range of
audiology services is required by
IDEA (2004).
May need to differentiate between
educational and clinical audiology
services
Many districts assume that
the audiologist can
provide services to an
infinite number of students
School-Based vs. Contractual
Agreement Service Delivery Models
School-Based Audiology Services
Contracted Audiology Services
Direct employee
Contract employee
Relatively autonomous
Completely autonomous
Services are typically comprehensive based on
job description
Services may be limited by scope of contract
Peer of other school employees; perceived as
“insider” with increased opportunities for
collaboration
Considered an “outside expert”; collaboration
with teachers may be difficult
Caseload may be large
Caseload can be specified in contract
District typically purchases and maintains
audiological equipment
District not usually responsible for diagnostic
audiological equipment
Overall cost to district may be less per service
Lower capital outlay
Often less efficient in small, rural systems with
small student population unless part of a
regional cooperative
Higher cost per service
May be appropriate for small, rural systems
unless part of cooperative with greater number
of students
Educational vs. Clinical Audiology
Educational Audiology
Clinical Audiology
Identify hearing loss at earliest age
Identify hearing loss at earliest age
Diagnose hearing impairment
Diagnose hearing and balance impairment
Evaluate hearing abilities and skill development
to determine hearing function in various
communication and learning settings
Communicate with physicians, families, and
referral sources
Select, fit, verify, and validate hearing
technology for educational settings
Dispense and monitor appropriate amplification
for personal use
Identify audiological information for educational
implications
Identify appropriate instructional modifications
and accommodations
Consult with students, teachers, parents, and
other relevant staff regarding hearing and
amplification needs
Ensure that amplification is working properly in
schools
Provide or assist with (re)habilitative needs within
learning environment
Educational Audiology Service
Delivery Models
Combined School-Based &
Contractual Agreement
Telepractice
This model can be useful
when the school-based
audiologist is not able to
provide services to all of the
students within the district or
when an audiologist with
specialized skills or
equipment is needed
Relatively new
Both audiologists must have:
Clearly outlined
responsibilities
Ability to collaborate to
eliminate duplication
ASHA (2005), Audiologists
PROVIDING Clinical Services
Via Telepractice: Technical
Report (available from
www.asha.org/policy).
Contracted arrangement
CI mapping
EDHI programs
Establishing and Expanding Educational
Audiology Services in Schools
Reimbursement for Educational Audiology Services
Dispensing Personal Hearing Instruments
Cerumen Management
Reimbursement for Educational
Audiology Services
A number of school systems have implemented third-party reimbursement from
Medicaid for audiology as a health related services provided to students under
IDEA (2004).
Educational Audiologists must be certified as Medicaid providers
Permitted by the guidelines from Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
(CMS)
Provided to Medicaid-eligible children
Medically necessary
Delivered and claimed in accordance with all other federal and state regulations
Included in the state Medicaid plan
Each state has the authority to:
Determine the type, amount, duration, and scope of services
Determine state eligibility standards
Set rates of payments
Administer its own program
Training for Educational Audiologists
Amplification
Educational management
of children with hearing loss
Mainstreaming
Auditory (re)habilitation
Working with special
populations
Sign language
counseling
Educational referral, followup procedures, and special
education eligibility
requirements
Evaluation of the need for,
selection, and maintenance
of personal FM and
classroom audio distribution
systems and other HAT used
in educational environments
Structure of the learning
environment, including
classroom acoustics, and
implications for learning
Training for Educational Audiologists
IFSP and IEP planning process
and procedures, including
interpretation of auditory
assessment results and their
implications, educational
options, and legal issues and
procedures
Consultation and collaboration
with classroom teachers and
other professionals regarding the
relationship of hearing and
hearing loss to the development
of academic and psychosocial
skills
Participation in team
management of
communication treatment
Knowledge of the various
communication modes used by
individuals who are deaf and
hard of hearing
Implementation of in-service
training for educational staff
and support personnel
Knowledge of school systems,
multidisciplinary teams, and
community and professional
resources
Additional Readings
ASHA: Guidelines for Audiology Service Provision In and
For Schools
Suggested Discipline Responsibilities for Identification,
Evaluation, Referral, and Services for Children with
Hearing Loss
Colorado Department of Education: Listening
Requirements for School Audiologists
Standards of Practice for Audiology Services in the
Schools: Colorado Department of Education
Assessment: The Cross-Check
Principle in Educational
Audiology
Cross-Check Principle in Educational
Audiology
Educational audiologists are seeing an increasing
number of children identified with hearing loss at very
young ages and with multiple learning challenges
Jerger and Hayes (2006)
Children should always be diagnosed using a test battery
Not just a single measure
Functional listening component of assessment battery often
falls under the scope of the educational audiologist
Assessment
Basic Assessment of Hearing Loss
Modifications for Special Populations
Monitoring Hearing Sensitivity
Additional Audiometric Information and Functional Hearing
Assessment
Assessment of Educational Effects of Hearing Loss
Communication of Assessment Results
Personal Vulnerability and Safety
When standard instructions don’t
work…
Bright-colored soft toys, bubbles, or
stickers
Keep materials for activities not in use
within easy reach, but out of sight
Reinstruct, but remember not to ask…
If activity is too interesting to maintain
attention to the task, simplify it
Change response activity often:
Objects dropped or put into a
container may need to be out of
sight after the child’s response (lids)
Ask the child to count beeps
Turn over picture or playing cards for
each beep
Use a soft band for bone-conduction
testing
Park cars in a garage
Place simple puzzle pieces or pegs
in holes
Assemble Mr. Potato Head
Place blocks on board, or checkers
on checker board
Put coins in a bank
Place objects on matching pictures
Toss bean bag or small, light balls
into a box/basket
Put pop-beads together
Additional Audiometric Information
and Functional Hearing Assessment
Speech Recognition for Sentences and Phrases
Listening in Noise
Speech Recognition with Visual Access
The Functional Listening Evaluation
Auditory and Listening Development Skills
Additional Audiometric Information
and Functional Hearing Assessment
Speech Recognition for
Sentences & Phrases
Listening in Noise
More realistic in terms of everyday
communication as compared with
word recognition
Critical part of audiological
assessment
Most do not have normative data,
but provide us with information
Examples:
Word Intelligibility by Picture
Identification Sentences
(4.5y+)
Pediatric Speech Intelligibility
Test (3y+)
Hearing in Noise Test for
Children
Word recognition scores
obtained in quiet are not
reflective of children’s ability
to understand speech in
classroom
Useful in alerting and
demonstrating to teachers
problems the child may
experience
Additional Audiometric Information
and Functional Hearing Assessment
Speech Recognition
with Visual Access
Auditory and Listening
Development Skills
Most audiometric speech
tests are administered using
auditory input alone
Some Tests of Auditory Skills:
Early Speech Perception
Test (ESP)
Functional Auditory
Performance Inventory
(FAPI)
Auditory Perception Test
for the Hearing Impaired
(APT-HI)
Cottage Acquisition
Scales for Listening,
Language, and Speech
(CASLLS)
Can be used to determine if
the child relies on visual cues
Can also be helpful to
determine if there is an
actual lack of
understanding, or if speech
production is actually
decreasing their auditory
only word recognition score
The Functional Listening Evaluation
Need to document a student’s ability to hear in environments other
than the soundbooth
The Functional Listening Evaluation (FLE)
Developed by Johnson and Von Almen (1993) using a paradigm
suggested by Ying (1990) and Ross, Brackett, and Maxon (1991)
Used to assess the effects of noise, distance, and visual access on a
students’ listening abilities
Designed to evaluate students in their classrooms
Due to room acoustics and individual classroom characteristics
8 lists of words, phrases, or sentences are used in 8 conditions
4 in quiet with close and distance proximities
Auditory only and auditory + visual access
Same 4 conditions are repeated with background noise present
30 minutes to administer
Classroom Acoustics
Classroom Acoustics
Classroom Acoustics and At-Risk
Children
Children
Adults
More vulnerable to the
effects of poor classroom
acoustics
More mature and skillful
listeners who rely on their
language and life
experiences to assist with
auditory closure and
gaining meaning in less
than optimal acoustical
conditions
More adversely affected
by noise and reverberation
as central auditory
pathways
(interhemispheric
organization & neural
synchrony) do not reach
maturity until adolesence
Perform better during
complex listening tasks
Classroom Acoustics and At-Risk
Children
In every classroom there are children who either have permanent
or fluctuating hearing loss or difficulty processing speech and
language, and the incidence is more prevalent with younger
children.
Listening and learning are affected when students cannot hear
clearly. Skills involved in auditory processing and learning to read
are impacted.
Listening and learning problems can be intensified because of
excessive noise and reverberation and the loss of intensity of the
teacher’s voice over distance or change in directionality.
Improving classroom acoustics may require attention to
architectural design principles and elements; acoustical
modifications; and the use of hearing assistive technologies
Classroom Acoustics and At-Risk
Children
At-Risk Populations for Learning in Poor Acoustical Environments:
Young children (<15 years old)
Conductive hearing loss
History of recurrent otitis media
Language or articulation disorder
Learning disability or dyslexia
English as a second language (ESL)
Auditory processing deficit
Minimal bilateral sensorineural hearing loss
Unilateral sensorineural hearing loss
Developmental delays
Attention deficits
Cochlear implants
Auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder (ANSD)
Properties of Classroom Acoustics
Noise
Any auditory disturbance that
interferes with what a listener wants or
needs to hear
Internal building noise, classroom
noise, external building noise
3 variables that contribute to speech
masking by noise are:
Long-term acoustical spectrum
of the noise (masking
consonants?)
Average noise intensity relative to
the intensity of speech
Fluctuation of noise intensity over
time
Signal-to-Noise Ratio
(SNR)
Relationship of the intensity of
the following:
Auditory signal (i.e.,
teacher’s voice, etc.)
Background noise
Young listeners need a quieter
listening environment
Goal for SNR without hearing loss
= +15 dB or more
Goal for SNR with hearing loss =
even more!
Properties of Classroom Acoustics
Reverberation
Occurs when sound persists in a
classroom as a result of repeated
reflection from surfaces in or
surrounding the enclosed space
Warning signs:
Hard ceilings without acoustical
tiles
High ceilings greater than 10 feet
Painting ceiling tiles (reduce
absorption)
Hard surface flooring
Lack of sound absorption
materials
Irregularly shaped classroom
Inverse Square Law &
Critical Distance
The distance from the sound
source has a significant
effect on the SNR. The direct
sound level decreases in
linear proportional to the
distance between the talker
and the listener
6 dB decrease in sound
pressure level (SPL) occurs
with each successive
doubling of distance from
the sound source
Classroom Acoustical Standards
ANSI/ASA S12.60-2002, Acoustical Performance Criteria, Design Requirements and
Guidelines for Schools (June 26, 2002)
Revision in 2010
Purpose = to assist school planning and design professionals in providing learning
environments that allow for good speech communication between teachers and
students in classrooms and other learning spaces without the use of electronic
amplification systems.
Standard is voluntary, unless referenced by state code, ordinance or regulation
Looks at:
Background Noise Considerations
Instructional Equipment Noise
Heating, Ventilation, and AC (HVAC), Building Services, and Utility Noise
Reverberation Time
Noise Isolation Design Requirements
Classroom Audio Distribution systems
Conformance and Tolerance Verification
Which states have adopted the
standard?
http://www.access-board.gov/acoustic/index.htm
New Hampshire Department of Education
New Jersey School Construction Board
State of Connecticut
Ohio School Facility Commission
New York City Public Schools
Arlington County (VA) Public Schools
Classroom Acoustics Resolutions and
Guidelines
AAA and ASHA both have developed position
statements on classroom acoustics
Roles of audiologists and acoustical consultants
U.S. Green Building Council (2009)
Classroom acoustics is a national agenda item for this
council
Measuring Classroom Acoustics
Classrooms of the 21st century are dynamic with active
learning environments where the acoustical parameters
change by time, the specific learning activity, and other
factors (Smaldino, Crandell, & Kreisman, 2005).
Specific Procedures to be used in measuring classroom
acoustics:
Classroom Observation
Measuring background noise levels in dBA
Measuring or estimating reverberation time
Measuring or estimating the SNR
Estimation of the critical distance
Measuring Classroom Acoustics
Classroom
Observation Tools
Classroom and Student
Observation and Assessment
Tools
Children’s Auditory Perception of Speech
(CHAPS)
Children’s Realistic Index of Speech
Perception (CRISP)
Evaluation of Classroom Listening Behaviors
(ECLB)
Classroom Acoustical Screening
Survey Worksheet
Fisher’s Auditory Problems Checklist
Modeling Classroom Acoustics
Listening and Learning Observation
Subjective Assessment of
Classroom Acoustics
Listening Environment Profile
Scale of Classroom Listening Behaviors
Screening Instrument for Target Educational
Classroom Acoustical
Modification Efficacy Scale I
(CES-I)
Classroom Acoustics
Documentation Form
Role of the Educational Audiologist in
Classroom Acoustics
Advocacy
Acting as an information resource
Performing observations and acoustical measurements in
classrooms and other learning spaces
Collaboration with educational facility planning teams
Ensuring acoustical access for special populations
Conducting efficacy measurements to determine the need
for and benefits from acoustic treatments and
modifications, as well as, HAT
Case Management and
Habilitation
Case Management and Habilitation
Planning Case Management and Habilitation
Implementing Audiological Habilitation
Services for Special Populations
Inclusions
Planning Case Management and
Habilitation
Service coordination for students with hearing
impairment
Implies communication and collaboration with more than
one service or service provider
Clarification of the needs and services for the student
with hearing loss
Identification of currently available school personnel
Arrangements for effective collaboration among service
providers
Development and implementation of a written
communication system
Implementing Audiological
Habilitation
Primary role of educational audiologist in habilitation is to facilitate optimal access to and use of
auditory input during the learning process
Direct
Indirect
Management of amplification
Development of auditory skills
Speechreading
Communication repair training
Management of environmental barriers to communication
Counseling
Classroom audio distribution systems and other HAT
Teacher collaboration
Selection of classrooms and teachers
Selection of auditory curricula and materials
Facilitation of auditory skill development
Information concerning student hearing loss and auditory function
Combination
Services for Special Populations
Unilateral, minimal, or high-frequency losses
Students with fluctuating hearing problems
APDs
ANSD
Children with multiple learning challenges
Four areas:
Amplification and other technology recommendations
Strategies for classroom management
Development of auditory goals and objectives
Monitoring student progress and auditory function
Categories of School Accommodations and
Modifications for Children with Listening Difficulties
Amplification
Assistive technology devices
Communication
Instruction
Physical environment
Curricula
Evaluation
Student Counseling and SelfAdvocacy
“One of the most difficult facts that
students with hearing loss will face is
that their hearing loss never goes
away.” Karen Anderson
Counseling Students with Hearing Loss
Service is typically overlooked or referred to another member of the
team
Teachers are often unaware of student feelings about the impact
of the hearing loss on relationships with peers
May not always refer the student for counseling
By providing information and support in the early years, many
adolescent frustrations can be lessened or even avoided
Enabling vs. Empowering
Remember back to “Family-Centered AR”
Tell them where to sit vs. teaching them variables to consider when
choosing where to sit
Hearing Loss Prevention
Planning a Hearing Loss Prevention
Program
Ongoing Programming
Curricular Interface
All materials should be reviewed by the teachers before use
Ensures developmental appropriateness of the materials and increases teacher support
Targeting the School Environment
Focus on noise produced within the school environment at each educational level
Noise levels in class have ranged from 85 to 115 dB, up to 128 dB in a woodworking class
Noise Criteria Standards
Make sure to design it with objectives related to general education
Consider how much class time the program will take
Teacher Involvement
Introduction
Activities that can be done by the teacher, para, or students
Designing a curricular sequence from preschool to highschool
OSHA: 90dBA for 8 hours (older) and NIOSH: 85 dBA for 8 hours (newer)
Permissible noise exposure criteria for children over a lifetime are unknown, more conservative damage-risk are warranted
Architectural Information
Hearing Loss Prevention Curricula
Preschool Hearing Loss Prevention Program
Elementary Hearing Loss Prevention Program
Middle School Hearing Loss Prevention Program
High School Hearing Loss Prevention Program
Preschool Hearing Loss Prevention
Program
Outcome: Early awareness
of need to protect ears
and hearing
Objective
We hear with our ears
We need to take care
of our ears
Loud sound can hurt
our ears
Content
Location and # of ears
Sources of sound; loud
vs. soft
Causes of damaging
noise (toys, etc.)
Ways to avoid noise
damage
Elementary Hearing Loss Prevention
Program
Outcome: Increased
awareness of hearing
process and danger of loud
noise exposure
Objective
Interface with school’s
curricular objectives on
hearing (one of 5 senses)
Loud noises can damage
hearing
We can help protect our
ears from loud noises
Content
How the ear transmits
sound
Damage to the ear
cannot be seen but can
be temporary or
permanent
Causes of damaging
noise
Some rooms and
locations are noisier than
others
Ways to avoid noise
damage
Middle School Hearing Loss
Prevention Program
Outcome: Understanding of the
implications of damaging noise
exposure and need for active
use of ear protection in specific
situations
Objective
The inner ear is susceptible to
permanent damage from
noise
Specific strategies can
prevent this noise damage
from occurring or from
increasing
Content
How the ear works and what
part is damaged by noise
exposure
Noise damage can be
permanent but can be
prevented; increased loss
can also be prevented if a
problem already exists
Sources of damaging noise
exposure
Ways to prevent damage
from noise
Symptoms of excessive noise
levels
Different surfaces reflect or
absorb sound waves
High School Hearing Loss Prevention
Program
Outcome: knowledge necessary
for prevention of hearing loss
caused by occupational and
recreational noise
Objective
Damaging noise levels can
occur in the workplace
Laws requiring employers to
protect employees from
noise-induced hearing loss
You can take precautions to
prevent noise-induced
hearing loss from
recreational sources
Content
Interface with vocational
and health curricula
Expanded information
regarding anatomy of the
ear with specific attention to
cochlea and cochlear
damage
Audiogram and
configuration associated
with noise-induced hearing
loss
Sources and levels for
damage from noise
exposure
Etc.
Numbers…
State
2006-2007 Estimated
Population
# of Audiologists
Employed
Alabama
754,110
21
Arizona
1,076,801
63
Arkansas
461,752
4
Florida
2,669,242
60
Hawaii
184,996
0
Mississippi
507,977
1
Oklahoma
588,016
5
Rhode Island
159,214
0
Texas
4,240,524
40
References
Cole, E. B., & Flexer, C. (2007). Children with hearing loss: Developing listening and
talking birth to six. San Diego, CA: Plural Publishing, Inc.
Deconde Johnson, C., & Seaton, J. B. (2012). Educational audiology handbook. (2nd
ed.). Clifton Park, NY: Delmar Cengage Learning.
Educational Audiology Association. (2012). Educational audiology association. Retrieved
from http://www.edaud.org/
Educational Audiology Association. (2012). Position statements. Retrieved from
http://www.edaud.org/displaycommon.cfm?an=1&subarticlenbr=4
Ling, D. (2002). Speech and the hearing-impaired child: Theory and practice. (2nd ed.).
Washington, DC: Alexander Graham Bell Association for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing.
Ling, D., & Ling, A. H. (1978, 1980, 1985). Aural habilitation: The foundations of verbal
learning in hearing-impaired children. (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: AG Bell Association for
the Deaf, Inc.