PAPAHANAUMOKUAKEA
Download
Report
Transcript PAPAHANAUMOKUAKEA
USES OF THE OCEAN
CHALLENGES & LESSONS LEARNED
James R. Walpole
Ocean Law Conference
May 22–23, 2008
Seattle, WA
PAPAHANAUMOKUAKEA
NATIONAL MARINE MONUMENT
140,000 square miles; 1,200 miles long
46 individual states are smaller
virtually untouched marine, coral and
island ecosystem
Designated 2006, Antiquities Act
Co-Trustees: Commerce (NOAA);
Interior (FWS); Hawaii (LNR)
PAPAHANAUMOKUAKEA
Federal, State overlap jurisdictions
U.S. Conservation areas (NOAA)
U.S. Wildlife refuge and battle monument (FWS)
Hawaii lands and water (LNR)
DOC – DOI regulations August 19, 2006
DOC –DOI-Hawaii December 8, 2006
Draft Monument Management Plan April 23 2008
Comments to July 8, 2008
Co-Trustees
PAPAHANAUMOKUAKEA
1200 pp. Draft
Vision; mission; management
Arrangements for Co-Trustees
Regulations
Management Needs
22 Action plans
PAPAHANAUMOKUAKEA
IMO “Particularly Sensitive Sea Area”
April 3, 2008
Listed on international navigation
charts
To/from U.S., report to Monument
Co-Trustees helped
U.S. OFFSHORE AQUACULTURE
For Commerce and Recreation
45% world fish from aquaculture
70% world aquaculture from China
60 million tons
70% U.S. seafood consumed is imported
40% of U.S. imports from aquaculture
U.S. aquaculture 600,000 tons (value $1B)
National Offshore Aquaculture Act
NOAA coordinates permit process (other
permits still required)
Aquaculture products not subject to
fishing definitions that restrict size,
season and harvest methods
NOAA to ensure the aquaculture
operations do not interfere with wild
stock conservation and management
National Offshore Aquaculture Act
Environmental requirements,
monitoring, enforcement Authority to
suspend, modify, revoke permits Bonds
or other financial guarantees
Consultations with FMCs, states,
federal agencies, stakeholders
Consistency with state plans
Act - Selected Provisions
Identification of farmed fish
Species allowed
Exemption from definition of
“fishing”
Savings clause
Extraterritorial jurisdiction
Offshore Legislation Rationale
Limited near shore areas in most states
No easy way to allow operation in federal waters
No easy way to set standards under current law
Over 10 years of preparatory work, new
technology
Demo and commercial operations in state waters
showing good environmental & production
results
Act - Enforcement Provisions
Unlawful activities
Enforcement provisions
Civil enforcement and permit sanction
Criminal offenses
Forfeitures
Severability & judicial review
Status of Offshore Legislation
March 17, 2007 Transmitted to
Congress
April 24, 2007 Introduced in House
June 14, 2007 Introduced in Senate
July 12, 2007 House hearing on H.R.
2010
Pass next Congress?
Acoustics & Marine Mammals
Focus man-made, not Nature
Whether and what effects?
Mask essential info, or no harm?
Whales, dolphins, porpoises - variables
Series: clicks, whistles, music-like - variables
Find way home, food, friends
In water 2900 mph; air 740 mph, all directions
Pitch, volumes, distances, temperature -
variables
Acoustics
ESA “jeopardy” MMPA “take”
NMSA, MPA “designate
Some evidence clear; some not clear
Research since 1940s
Much active research NOAA, MMC, Office Naval
Research, NRDC, NAS, universities, foundations…
Acoustics
Science studies - wide variables
Sounds variable-pile driver port construction,
energy platform; ship propellers (cargo, fishing,
cruise, charter), dynamite; research, military); air
guns; sonar; seismic exploration or research,…
No consensus – 2006 Advisory Committee report
28 members
Necessary scientific work continues U.S., foreign,
United Nations – policies being developed
Acoustics
Research is cutting-edge, involves many disciplines
Vets, physicists, bios, stats, pathols, engs, audios…
Much research - little priorities, coordination
Need overall program, probably USG (transparent)
Research priorities, methods via pub/priv
scientists
Public-private mitigation if needed
Eng. tools, intense/frequency reduce, contain,
seasonal
Coordinate internationally