Transcript Document

Exotic baryons: predictions, postdictions
and implications
Maxim V. Polyakov
Petersburg NPI & Liege University
Outline:
- predictions of pentaquarks
- Baryons as chiral solitons
- postdictions
- implications
Hanoi, August 8
What are pentaquarks?


• Minimum content: 4 quarks and 1 antiquark qqqqQ
• “Exotic” pentaquarks are those where the antiquark has
a different flavour than the other 4 quarks
• Quantum numbers cannot be defined by 3 quarks alone.
Example: uudss, non-exotic
Baryon number = 1/3 + 1/3 + 1/3 + 1/3 – 1/3 = 1
Strangeness = 0 + 0 + 0 − 1 + 1 = 0
The same quantum numbers one obtains from uud
Example: uudds, exotic
Baryon number = 1/3 + 1/3 + 1/3 + 1/3 – 1/3 = 1
Strangeness = 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 1 = +1
Impossible in trio qqq
Quarks are confined inside
colourless hadrons
q
q
q
Mystery remains:
Of the many possibilities for
combining quarks with colour into
colourless hadrons, only two
configurations were found, till recently…
Particle Data Group 1986 reviewing evidence for exotic baryons
states
“…The general prejudice against baryons not made of three quarks
and the lack of any experimental activity in this area make it likely
that it will be another 15 years before the issue is decided.
PDG dropped the discussion on pentaquark searches after 1988.
Baryon states
All baryonic states listed in PDG can be made of 3 quarks only
* classified as octets, decuplets and singlets of flavour SU(3)
* Strangeness range from S=0 to S=-3
A baryonic state with S=+1 is explicitely EXOTIC
• Cannot be made of 3 quarks
•Minimal quark content should be qqqqs , hence pentaquark
•Must belong to higher SU(3) multiplets, e.g anti-decuplet
observation of a S=+1 baryon implies a new large multiplet of
baryons (pentaquark is always ocompanied by its large family!)
important
Searches for such states started in 1966, with negative
results till autumn 2002 [16 years after 1986 report of PDG !]
…it will be another 15 years before the issue is decided.
Theoretical predictions for pentaquarks
1. Bag models [R.L. Jaffe ‘77, J. De Swart ‘80]
Jp =1/2- lightest pentaquark
Masses higher than 1700 MeV, width ~ hundreds MeV
Mass of the pentaquark is roughly 5 M +(strangeness) ~ 1800 MeV
An additional q –anti-q pair is added as constituent
2. Skyrme models [Diakonov, Petrov ‘84, Chemtob‘85,
Praszalowicz ‘87, Walliser ’92, Weigel `94]
Exotic anti-decuplet of baryons with lightest S=+1
Jp =1/2+ pentaquark with mass in the range
1500-1800 MeV.
Mass of the pentaquark is rougly 3 M +(1/baryon size)+(strangeness) ~ 1500MeV
An additional q –anti-q pair is added in the form of excitation of nearly massless
chiral field
The question what is the width of the exotic pentaquark
In Skyrme model has not been address untill 1997
It came out that it should be „anomalously“ narrow!
Light and narrow pentaquark is expected ->
drive for experiments
[D. Diakonov, V. Petrov, M. P. ’97]
The Anti-decuplet
Symmetries give
an equal spacing
between “tiers”
Width < 15 MeV !
uud (dd  ss)
uus(dd  ss)
uss(uu  dd )
Diakonov, Petrov, MVP 1997
Chiral Symmetry of QCD
QCD in the chiral limit, i.e. Quark masses ~ 0
LQCD
1 a a


 - 2 F F   (i     A )
4g
Global QCD-Symmetry  Lagrangean invariant
under:

hadron
 u 
A A  u
SU (2)V :       '  exp -i   
multiplets
 d 
 d 
 u 
 u 
A A
SU (2) A :       '  exp -i   5  
 d 
 d 
Symmetry of Lagrangean is not the same
as the symmetry of eigenstates
No Multiplets
Symmetry is
sponteneousl
broken
Unbroken chiral symmetry of QCD would mean
That all states with opposite parity have equal masses
But in reality:
-

1
* 1
N ( ) - N ( )  600MeV
2
2
The difference is too large to be explained by
Non-zero quark masses
chiral symmetry is spontaneously broken
pions are light [=pseudo-Goldstone bosons]
nucleons are heavy
nuclei exist
... we exist
  > 0
10MeV
current-quarks (~5 MeV) 
Constituent-quarks (~350
MeV)
Spontaneous
Chiral symmetry
breaking
  > 0
2*350MeV
Particles  Quasiparticles
QuarkModel
•Three massive quarks
•2-particle-interactions:
•confinement potential
•gluon-exchange
•meson-exchage
Nucleon
•(non) relativistisc
• chiral symmetry is not respected
•Succesfull spectroscopy (?)
Chiral
Soliton
Mean Goldstone-fields
(Pion, Kaon)
Nucleon
Large Nc-Expansion of
QCD ????
Quantum
numbers
Quantum #
Coupling of spins,
isospins etc. of 3 quarks
mean field  non-linear
system  soliton 
rotation of soliton
Quantum #
Natural way for light baryon
exotics. Also usual „3-quark“
Quark-anti-quark
pairs
„stored“
Quantum
in #
Coherent :1p-1h,2p-2h,....
baryons
should contain
a lot
of
chiral mean-field
antiquarks
Analogy in atomic physics: Thomas-Fermi atom.
There is nothing weird in idea „baryon as a soliton“,
Large Z atoms are in the same way solitons!
SU(3): Collective Quantization
3
Lcoll
L
J 
 a
NcB
8
J 2 3
a
7
I1
I2
3 8
a a
a a
 M 0       

2 a 1
2 a 4
2
3
7
1
1
a ˆa
a ˆa
ˆ
ˆ
Hˆ coll 
J
J

J
J  constraint


2 I1 a 1
2 I 2 a 4
From
2Jˆ 8
WessY'  1
Zumino
3
-term
 Jˆ a , Jˆ b   if abc Jˆ c


Calculate eigenstates of Hcoll
and select those, which fulfill
the constraint
SU(3): Collective Quantization
3
Lcoll
L
J 
 a
NcB
8
J 2 3
7
I1
I2
3 8
a a
a a
 M 0       

2 a 1
2 a 4
2
3
7
1
1
a ˆa
a ˆa
ˆ
ˆ
Hˆ coll 
J
J

J
J  constraint


2 I1 a 1
2 I 2 a 4
3, 3, 6 ,8,10,10, 27,...
2Jˆ 8
Y'  1



1
3
1
3
J=T 
....
Known from
2
2
2
delta-nucleon
3
3
splitting
 Jˆ a , Jˆ b   if abc Jˆ c
10-8 =
10-8 =


2I1
2I 2
3
3
Spin and parity are predicted !!!
10-10 =
2I 2 2I1
a
General idea: 8, 10, anti-10, etc are various excitations
of the same mean field  properties are interrelated
Example [Gudagnini ‘84]
8(m*  mN )  3m  11m  8m*
Relates masses in 8 and 10, accuracy 1%
To fix masses of anti-10 one needs to know the
value of I2 which is not fixed by masses of 8 and 10
DPP‘97
~180 MeV
In linear order in ms
Input to fix I2
Jp =1/2+
Mass is in expected range (model calculations of I2)
P11(1440) too low, P11(2100) too high
Decay branchings fit soliton picture better
Decays of the anti-decuplet
p,K,
h
All decay constants for 8,10 and anti-10 can be expressed
in terms of 3 universal couplings: G0, G1 and G2
 decuplet
1
[G0  G1 ]2
2
 anti-decuplet
1
2
[G0 - G1 - G2 ]
2
1
G0 - G1 - G2  0 In NR limit ! DPP‘97
2
„Natural“ width ~100 MeV
 < 15 MeV
Q
Non strange partners revisited
N(1710) is not seen anymore in most recent pN
scattering PWA [Arndt et al. 03]
If Q is extremely narrow N* should be also
narrow 10-20 MeV. Narrow resonance easy to miss
in PWA. There is a possiblity for narrow N*(1/2+) at
1680 and/or 1730 MeV [Arndt, et al. 03]
In the soliton picture mixing with usual nucleon
is very important. p N mode is suppressed,
hN and p modes are enhanced.
Anti-decuplet nature of N* can be checked by
photoexcitation. It is excited much stronger
from the neuteron, not from the proton [Rathke, MVP]
GRAAL results: comparison of eta N photoproduction
on the proton and neutron [V. Kouznetsov]
Theory Postdictions
Super radiance resonance
Diamond lattice
of gluon
strings
Rapidly
developing
theory: >250 papers
Q+(1540)>as2.5
a heptaquark
resubmissions
in 1hep
QCD sumper
rules,paper
parity =Lattice QCD P=-1 or P=+1
di-quarks + antiquark, P=+1
colour molecula, P=+1
Constituent quark models, P=-1 or P=+1
Exotic baryons in the large Nc limit
Anti-charmed Q , and anti-beauty Q
Q produced in the quark-gluon plasma and nuclear matter
SU(3) partners of Q
Constituent quark model
If one employs flavour independent forces between quarks
(OGE) natural parity is negative, although P=+1 possible to arrange
With chiral forces between quarks natural parity is P=+1
[Stancu, Riska; Glozman]
•No prediction for width
•Implies large number of excited pentaquarks
Missing Pentaquarks ?
(And their families)
Mass difference  -Q ~ 150 MeV
Diquark model [Jaffe, Wilczek]
No dynamic explanation of
Strong clustering of quarks
Dynamical calculations suggest large mass
[Narodetsky et al.; Shuryak, Zahed]
JP=1/2+ is assumed, not
computed
(ud)
L=1
s
(ud)
JP=3/2+ pentaquark should be close in
mass [Dudek, Close]
Anti-decuplet is accompanied by an octet of pentaquarks.
P11(1440) is a candidate
No prediction for width
Mass difference  -Q ~ 150 MeV -> Light  pentaquark
Implications of the Pentaquark
 Views on what hadrons “made of” and how do they
“work” may have fundamentally changed
- renaissance of hadron physics
- need to take a fresh look at what we thought we
knew well. E.g. strangeness and other “sea’s” in nucleons.
 Quark model & flux tube model are incomplete and
should be revisited. Also we have to think what questions we have to
ask lattice QCD.
 Does Q start a new Regge trajectory? -> implications
for high energy scattering of hadrons ! What about duality?
 Can Q become stable in nuclear matter? -> physics
of compact stars! New type of hypernuclei !
 Assuming that chiral forces are essential in binding of quarks
one gets the lowest baryon multiplets
(8,1/2+), (10, 3/2+), (anti-10, 1/2+)
whose properties are related by symmetry
 Predicted Q pentaquark is light NOT because it is a sum of
5 constituent quark masses but rather a collective excitation
of the mean chiral field. It is narrow for the same reason
 Where are family members accompaning the pentaquark
Are these “well established 3-quark states”? Or we should
look for new “missing resonances”? Or we should reconsider
fundamentally our view on spectroscopy?