Lesson-8-Dopamine-hy..
Download
Report
Transcript Lesson-8-Dopamine-hy..
Evaluation of the dopamine
hypothesis (biological explanation)
Using SODAR – using slides 16-23
Worksheet – learning space
Complete using the information provided on the learning space, the slides
and your own research
Remember the importance of having enough
A01
S
O
Dopamine
hypothesis
(SOAR)
D
A
R
Support for dopamine hypothesis
Post mortems of brains of people who had have had schizophrenia show a higher density of dopamine receptors is in
certain parts of the brain (cerebral cortex) than those who have not suffered from schizophrenia (Owen et al. 1978)
Wong et al. (1980) – PET brain scans show increase of dopamine in patients of schizophrenia (research details for more
A01)
Medication – symptoms are treated with dopamine antagonists (chlorpromazine)
Blocks dopamine receptors therefore less dopamine is taken up therefore the effects of excess dopamine is avoided
Helps alleviate positive symptoms in 60% of cases
SZ- more sensitive to the action of dopamine
Seeman (2013) People diagnosed with schizophrenia may have a higher number of D2 receptors with a high affinity to
dopamine
More likely to bind to the neurotransmitter when it is present in the synapse
More likely to overreact to the presence of the neurotransmitter
This may result from a combination of increased presynaptic neural pruning, a high release of dopamine (Howes et al.,
2012), altered numbers of dopamine D2 receptors (Seeman, 2013a), and/or an increased sensitivity of the D2 receptor to
dopamine (Seeman, 2011).
This view is supported by the fact that the positive symptoms of delusions and hallucinations are alleviated in the majority
of patients by D2-blocking medications.
Support:
Leiberman et al. 1987
Those treated with dopamine enhancing levodopa for Parkinson's disease can experience
psychotic side effects mimicking the symptoms of schizophrenia.
Up to 75% of patients with schizophrenia have increased signs and symptoms of their psychosis
upon challenge with moderate doses of methylphenidate or amphetamine or other dopaminelike compounds, all given at doses at which control normal volunteers do not have any
psychologically disturbing effects (Kammen, Docherty and Bunney 1982)
However not all users of amphetamine suffer from psychotic symptoms – Suggesting there is something
different about how people’s brains react to dopamine
However 40% don’t have a response to dopamine antagonist medication –
therefore the medication still lowers levels of dopamine but doesn’t always treat
the disorder. Therefore there must be another cause of symptoms.
There is lack of impact on the negative symptoms
PET scans show that blocking dopamine receptors does not always remove
symptoms
The scans show that the medication does not alleviate symptoms if the
patient has had schizophrenia for 10 years or more even if the block is 90%
effective
If the medication is administered early on in the disorder then more than 90%
of patients respond
Amphetamines only produce symptoms that are like the positive
symptoms and not the negative symptoms which suggests that dopamine
hypothesis is not sufficient enough explanations
People experience symptoms of mania when taking amphetamines which
is not a symptom experience by those with schizophrenia
Difference theories
This hypothesis does not
negate the dopamine
hypothesis. Perhaps
scientists should be
looking at both
neurotransmitters?
Other neurotransmitters may be involved in the development of schizophrenia linked to psychosis
The glutamate hypothesis
Those who take PCS ‘angel dust’ experience symptoms similar to those who have schizophrenia (positive symptoms and negative e.g. psychotic state and
inability to pay attention and changes cognitive function)
PCP acts at one of the receptors that glutamate stimulates to block the affects of glutamine
From this it is hypothesis that schizophrenia symptoms may be due to a deficiency in this receptor (NDMA) and the receptor cannot properly be
stimulated by glutamate (Moghaddam and Javitt 2012)
In the last 15 years 26 placebo controlled double blind trials have been carried out to identify if sarcosine can reduce symptoms of schizophrenia
Sarcosine helps increase NMDA receptor activation
Effects of this drug on negative symptoms are highly significant. Effects on cognition, positive symptoms, and general psychopathology are more modest
but still significant (Lin, 2010)
Enhancing NMDAR function can significantly reduce symptoms in schizophrenia, especially those least responsive to existing antipsychotic medications.
Correlation only
Perhaps neurotransmitter functioning takes place because of other issues in our genetic make up or stimulation from the environment
Perhaps stressful events in life can trigger production of excess dopamine or the blocking of glutamate.
Application - usefulness
Why is the explanation useful to those with schizophrenia?
Dopamine antagonist medication is seen to work 60% of the time
(Leiberman, 1987)
This ensures there distress is decreased and that their wellbeing is
enhanced.
Point: People with Schizophrenia are more sensitive to dopamine
uptake (Carlsson)
How can this be used as evidence for usefulness?
Reductionism
Does this theory
oversimplify the
explanation of
schizophrenia?
This is a reductionist explanation as it explains the disorder by the smallest
possible ‘unit’ of explanations – an imbalance of a single neurotransmitter.
This ignores the complex interrelationship between neurotransmitter levels
and other biological, psychological and social factors that may influence
the whether an individual may develop the disorder.
Evidence on the next slide…..
Seeman (2014) a more holistic/interactionist
explanation should be used
“It is further here suggested that dopaminergic overdrive is a necessary
step on the path between initial causation and symptom expression.
As such, therapeutic interventions need to focus on preventing
dopamine overstimulation through a combination of means:
• biological (dampening dopamine release and transmission)
• psychological (muting stress that is mediated through dopamine
pathways)
• sociological (alleviating poverty and discrimination, which raise
dopamine activity in large swaths of the population).”
‘To what extent does the dopamine
hypothesis explain Schizophrenia.’ (16)
Further evaluation
Psychology as science?
Use of psychological knowledge in society? Change towards a medical
treatment as it has a physical cause has led to the development of
antipsychotic medication. Enhance well being and decrease distress.
Prevents hospitalisation.
Ethics of research with patients with schizophrenia - informed consent?
Link to developmental psychology
5.1.6 of specification requires this link
The neurochemical balance can be affected by many things during
development
Genes from conception
Prenatal factors – maternal illness or exposure to infection o lack of nutrition
(Opler & Susser, 2005)
Chemical exposure (i.e. drugs)
Schizophrenia developed in late adolescence and early adulthood – why is it
important for developmental psychologists to take this into account?
Individual differences
5.1.5 of the specification
Symptoms are diverse
Individual differences are not taken into account in this explanation
Not everyone will have the same reaction on treatment
Leiberman et al. (1987)
‘However 40% don’t have a response to dopamine antagonist medication –
therefore the medication still lowers levels of dopamine but doesn’t always treat the
disorder. Therefore there must be another cause of symptoms.’