Transcript Powerpoint slides here.

Descending Control,
Attention & Summing Up
How Your Brain Works - Week 10
Dr. Jan Schnupp
[email protected]
HowYourBrainWorks.net
Recapping from Previous Lectures
• Electrical and chemical signalling in nerve cells is
used to link sensory input to motor output.
• The link can be very simple (unconditioned
withdrawal reflex), moderately complex
(conditioned reflex) or highly complex (“cognitive”
tasks).
Motor
Output
CNS
Sensory
Input
Recapping from Previous Lectures
• The central
nervous system is
composed of
many subsystems
that are organized
in a hierarchical
manner.
• Generally, more
complex the
“sensory input →
behaviour
mappings” require
more involvement
of “higher order
centres”.
Cortex
Cerebellum
Midbrain
Sensory
Input
Motor
Output
Brainstem
Sensory
Input
Motor
Output
Spinal Cord
Sensory
Input
Recapping from Previous Lectures
• Synaptic connections along the
neural pathways can perform
computations by summation of
excitatory and inhibitory inputs
and divergent and convergent
connection patterns.
• Many synapses are modifiable,
allowing connection patterns,
(and hence the function of
neurons) to be shaped by
experience.
• Examples we considered
included early visual
development, reinforcement
learning and episodic memory
formation.
LGN
- + - + -+
-
Cortex
+ - + - + - +
Recapping from Previous Lectures
• Neurons in many parts of the
central nervous system are
highly spontaneously active,
and are parts of networks that
are wired up “recurrently”.
• In other words, nerve
impulses could in principle
come about for apparently no
good reason at all, keep going
round and around endlessly
through countless parallel
loops, and may trigger
spontaneous (pointless?!)
action.
• Remember the dyskinetic
patient we saw in an earlier
lecture? Or the spinal pattern
generators?
Motor
Output
CNS
Recapping from Previous Lectures
• The “loops” through the brain provide key short- and
long term memory functions, and are subject to
regulation by “neuromodulator” (dopamine,
noradrenaline …) and hormonal (leptin, ghrelin,
oxytocin,…) systems. They therefore link experience
and emotional and physiological state into our action
patterns.
“Memory”
Motor
Output
CNS
Internal State
Sensory
Input
Split-brain Patients and the
Conundrum of the Single “Me”
What “unifies” the massively parallel
and widely distributed brain activity
into an apparently single “mind”?
We don’t know for certain, but:
1. the single, unified “self” is probably much
more of an illusion than we normally admit to
ourselves, and
2. Being able to focus attention on “one thing
at a time” probably helps.
Competitive (“Winner Take All”)
Networks
Backprojections in
Sensory Pathways
• Connections along
ascending sensory
pathways tend to be
two-way.
• Descending connections
can outnumber
ascending connections.
• In the case of hearing,
backprojections go all
the way back to the
cochlea.
Cortex
Midbrain
Brainstem
Spinal Cord
Fritz et al.: Measuring STRFs in a Behaving Ferret
Ferrets drink from water spout while listening to sound stimuli. Broadband
“TORCs” signal that the animal can drink in comfort. Pure tones signal that a
mild but unpleasant electric voltage is about to be applied to the spout. The
animals quickly learn to interrupt drinking until the TORCs resume. The sound
frequency of the warning (“target”) tone is held constant throughout an
experimental session. A1 STRFs can be constructed by reverse correlation
with responses to TORC stimuli.
Attention Induced STRF Changes
• From Fritz et al Nature Neuroscience 6, 1216 - 1223 (2003)
• Filter properties (STRFs) of A1 neurons change rapidly as the
animal attends to particular target frequencies.
Attention Retunes Sensory
Receptive Fields :Experiments by Shamma and
Colleagues
Attention Has a High Metabolic Cost
:Experiments by Heeger and
Colleagues
Pattern Detection Task
• Stimulus:
versus
threshold contrast
pattern
uniform field
• Auditory
Task:cue:
Stimulus:
present
present
yes
no
Response:
0
10
20
Time (s)
absent
yes
30
40
Strong response when stimulus is present
Individual trial
time series
average of 296 trials
subject: DBR
0.5
fMRI response
(% BOLD signal)
0.4
mean, std. error
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
-0.1
-0.2
0
2
4
6
8
Time (s)
10
12
14
16
Large response even when stimulus absent
• Base response when stimulus absent — attention?
• Small increment when stimulus present — sensory
signal?
Stimulus present
0.5
Increment
fMRI response
(% BOLD signal)
0.4
0.3
0.2
Base response
Stimulus
absent
0.1
0
subject: DBR
-0.1
-0.2
0
2
4
6
8
Time (s)
10
12
14
16
Base response depends on task difficulty
Varying task difficulty by changing stimulus contrast
Threshold (0.8%) contrast
fMRI response
(% BOLD signal)
0.8
2x (1.5%) contrast
subject: DBR
0.8
Pattern present
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
Pattern absent
-0.2
-0.4
0
2 4
6
High (50%) contrast
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
-0.2
-0.2
-0.4
8 10 12 14 16
0 2
-0.4
4
6 8 10 12 14 16
0
2 4
Time (s)
Easier task:
- attentional response decreases
- sensory-evoked increment in response increases
6
8 10 12 14 16
How the Brain Works
“Memory”
Motor
Output
CNS
Internal State
Sensory
Input
“Attention”