bcs513_lecture_week11_class2
Download
Report
Transcript bcs513_lecture_week11_class2
Neural representation and decoding of
the meanings of words (continued)
Some PubMed search tips
that you might not already know
Selecting by subfield, e.g. title
Boolean searches and wildcards
Different ways of referring to same thing
Review tag
Ways of representing meaning
Corpus semantics / distributional semantics
• See how words co-occur with each other in large
bodies of text
Semantic network
• Relations between words: “is-a”, etc.
• WordNet
Embodied semantics
• Meanings are grounded in sense modalities
The Mitchell study:
word stimuli and semantic features
Stimuli: concrete nouns
• E.g. hammer, shirt, dog, celery (60 words in all)
• 12 categories (tools, clothing, food, etc.), each with 5
words
Semantic features: action verbs
• E.g. push, move, taste, see (25 semantic features in all)
• Each noun has a 25-element semantic feature vector of
its co-occurrence freqs with the verbs, from Google textcorpus
• hammer = 0.13*break + 0.93*touch + 0.01*eat + …
• celery = 0.00*break + 0.03*touch + 0.84*eat + …
Example co-occurrence features
Features for cat:
say said says (0.592),
see sees (0.449),
eat ate eats (0.435),
run ran runs (0.303),
hear hears heard (0.208),
open opens opened (0.175),
smell smells smelled (0.163),
clean cleaned cleans (0.146),
move moved moves (0.088),
listen listens listened (0.075),
touch touched touches (0.075) …
http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~tom/science2008/semanticFeatureVectors.html
Mitchell model architecture:
represent nouns in terms of
semantic features (action verbs)
fMRI data and semantic features publicly available at
http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~tom/science2008
Interpolating between stimuli,
using a model of the stimulus space
Pattern-information
analysis: from stimulus
decoding to
computational-model
testing. Kriegeskorte
N. Neuroimage. 2011
May 15;56(2):411-21.
Corpus based approach:
pros and cons
Advantages:
•
•
•
Works quite well in practice
Used a lot in computer language processing
Good for capturing semantic relations between single
words
Disadvantages:
•
•
Unclear how to relate it to neural representations
Unclear how to handle logical relations between words
Semantic network
http://www.visualthesaurus.com
WordNet
Founded by George Miller (“magic number 7”)
http://wordnet.princeton.edu/
Huth et al. (2012)
Semantic space in cortex
Representing categories in WordNet
Principal Components Analysis (PCA)
http://web.media.mit.edu/~tristan/phd/dissertation/figures/PCA.jpg
Representing multiple semantic
principal components
A closer look at semantic space
What do the components mean?
Highly distributed representations
How much of each region’s activation
does the model explain?
Embodied theory of meaning
Words are represented in terms of bodily sense
modalities: vision, hearing, movement, etc.
•
•
•
Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annu.
Rev. Psychol., 59, 617-645.
Pulvermüller, F. (2013). How neurons make
meaning: brain mechanisms for embodied and
abstract-symbolic semantics. Trends in cognitive
sciences, 17(9), 458-470.
Binder, J. R., & Desai, R. H. (2011). The
neurobiology of semantic memory. Trends in
cognitive sciences, 15(11), 527-536.
Embodied theory of meaning
•
Binder, J. R., & Desai, R. H. (2011). The neurobiology of semantic
memory. Trends in cognitive sciences, 15(11), 527-536.
Embodied theory of meaning
•
Pulvermüller, F. (2013). How neurons make meaning: brain
mechanisms for embodied and abstract-symbolic semantics. Trends
in cognitive sciences, 17(9), 458-470.
Example: somatotopic
representation of motor words
Example: somatotopic
representation of motor words
Pulvermüller, F., Trends in Cog Sci (2013).
Embodied-looking activation shows
up even using corpus statistics
“Gustatory cortex” for celery in Mitchell et al. (2008)
Mouth / toungue areas
What about abstract words?
Pulvermüller, F., Trends in Cog Sci (2013).
Higher level “abstraction” areas?
Pulvermüller, F., Trends in Cog Sci (2013).
Lots of open questions!
Composition of meaning:
• How does the brain build a representation of “The
child threw the ball” out of its representations of
“child”, “threw” and “ball”?
Systematicity / compositionality
• The brain can recombine words into a potentially
unlimited number of new sentences. How?
Syntax
• How does the brain represent “the cat chased the
dog” vs “the dog chased the cat” ?