Transcript Snímka 1

International marketing and core debate:
adaptation versus homogenization
Elena Horská
Considering global,
regional and local approach
„...Strategies and sources are solved at global level in our
company, .... We produce regionally and sell locally. ... We
support our brand and take care of local customer
preferencies...“
(Herbert Baum, exprezident Campbell´s soup)
„ ... Consideration on globalization and regionalization point at
fact that company Nestle looks for balance between the global
strategy and local conditions...“
(Peter Brabech – Lemathe, Nestle)
Think global, act local...
• In the 1970s the argument was framed as
„standardization vs. adaptation.“
• In the 1980s it was „globalization vs. localization.“
• In the 1990s it was „global integration versus local
responsibilities.“
• In the twenty-first century, standardization versus
adaptation is simply not the right question to ask. Rather,
the crucial question facing international marketers is
what are the most efficient ways to segment markets.
Adaptation
• Adapting the marketing features to the
local requirements and consumer needs:
– Product
– Price
– Place
– Promotion
Standardization
• Standardizated products for global
markets:
– Product
– Price
– Place
– Promotion
G-localization
• Combination of standardization and
localization in terms:
– to behave as the home firm
– to accept the local patriotism
– to change the local consumer behaviour
continuously, no rapidly
– consumers to perceive the market changes
as the natural development, no aggressive
marketing.
According to research associated with VanderMerwe and L´Huillier (1989),
companies in Europe can compete effectively in Europe by accurately
targeting customers close to one another,
but not necessary living in the same country.
The six clusters identified by VanderMerwe and L´Huillier (1989) are:
• the UK and Ireland,
• Central and Northern France, Southern Belgium, Central Germany and
Luxembourg,
• Spain and Portugal,
• Southern Germany, Northern Italy, Southeastern France and Austria,
• South Italy and Greece,
• Northern Germany, the Netherlands, Northern Belgium, Iceland, Norway,
Finland and Denmark.
These studies did not consider countries of the Central and Eastern Europe. In
present time they play an important role in processes of the European
economic integration and present challenges for Western companies entering
their markets.
Based on the common features of historic background, geographical location,
culture and consumer habits we can distinguish between Central European
cluster, South – East European cluster and Baltic States. Of course, there are
still certain internal differences within such roughly defined clusters.