Transcript Smart Focal Planes

Opticon JRA5: Smart Focal
Planes
Colin Cunningham
UK ATC, Edinburgh
11th November 2008
OPTICON Smart Focal Planes
Consortium
• Partners:
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
UK ATC, Univs Durham & Cambridge (UK)
LAM, CRAL (France)
IAC (Spain)
TNO/TPD, ASTRON (Netherlands),
CSEM (Switzerland)
INAF-Padova (Italy)
Univ Bremen (Germany)
Reflex s r o (Czech Republic)
– Anglo Australian Observatory (UK/Australia)
2
Objectives
• Evaluate, develop and prototype of
technologies for Smart Focal Planes
• Build up and strengthen a network of
expertise in Europe, and encourage mobility
between partners
• Engage European Industry in the
development of technologies which can be
batch produced to enable future complex
instruments to be built economically
• Enable these technologies to be developed
to the stage where they can be considered
for the next generation of telescopes
3
Survey of Smart Focal Plane
technologies
4
Science Motivation: Multi IFU
Spectroscopy
Prominent Science
Cases
1. First light – the
highest-redshift
galaxies
2. Physics of highredshift galaxies
Secondary Science
Cases
1. Resolved Stellar
populations
2. Initial Mass
Function in stellar
clusters
5
Multi-Slit Spectroscopy
•Multi-slit
spectroscopy in the
NIR provides an
alternative, which
may be better fitted
to some science
cases
•MOSFIRE on Keck
> TMT instrument
Image courtesy Ian McLean
(UCLA)
6
Methodology
• Start with Instrument concepts to define
technology requirements – SmartMOS &
SmartMOMSI
• Develop and prototype technology
• Feed lessons back into iterations of
instrument concepts
• Feed this into ELT instrument Design
Studies and Phase A studies
– Very successful > EAGLE, SMOS, OPTIMOS
consortia
7
Phase B
• WP6: Prototype Technologies: Design: Build
and test prototype devices and subsystems.
Complete
• WP7: Verify Technology: Design, build, and
test laboratory test equipment, and evaluate
the new technology prototype devices in
test equipment. Demonstrate
manufacturability of chosen technology.
Complete
• WP8: Feasibility studies: Continue studies of
feasibility of technologies with medium to
long-term availability and potential high
performance Yes – MOEMS devices & Micro
robots
8
Technology Highlights
since Corfu Meeting
TipTilt Focus cryogenic
unit
• NOVA-ASTRON: Johan
Pragt & Lars Venema
• Aimed at focal plane
alignment at temp.
down to 70K
• Based on Industrial
(low-cost) piezo motor
10
Piezo characterisation at
low temperature
• Several motors tested
• Piezo material characterised till 77K
(dielectric strenght, voltage - expansion)
• Piezoleg of piezomotor tested till 100K
– Modified electronics
– Motor speed and force at low temperatures equals room
temperature
11
Design of prototype
• Mechanical design
• Mechanical calculations
• Specifications based on Xshooter nIR
•
Moving mass 1 kg
detector
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Speed: 0.5 mm/sec
Focus (along z axis) total stroke: ± 0.6 mm,
res.:2.5 µm
Tip/Tilt stroke: ± 1.2 mrad , resolution: 0.1 mrad
Self braking system
Earth quake resistant to 4 g without damage
First natural frequency > 60 Hz
All gravity directions
Environment: 293 K, 105 K vacuum, 77 K vacuum
12
Working prototype
•
Low-cost Industrial piezo
motor, modified and tested for
cryogenic use
•
Design of a small TipTiltFocus
unit for Hawaii 2RG detector,
suitable as building block for
optical components
•
Build of a full working unit
•
Publication and
demonstrated working unit
at SPIE Marseille 2008
13
Micromirror Array:
Frederic Zamkotsian, LAM
with IMT & Université de Neuchatel
• Array micromirrors
• Freely configurable
• Millisecond response time
• Fully functional at 100K
• Flatness < 50nm PTV
• micromirror array
• 5x5 mirrors
• Size: 100x200 µm
14
Double-Stopping Operation Concept
electrodes
stopper
spacer
flexure
mirror
stopper
frame
Wilfried Noell, IMT
15
Double-Stopping Operation Concept
actuation V > 85V
16
Double-Stopping Operation Concept
actuation V > 85V
1st point of contact
 new pivot point
17
Double-Stopping Operation Concept
actuation V > 85V
1st point of contact
 new pivot point
2nd point of contact
18
Double-Stopping Operation Concept
holding V < 80V
1st point of contact
 new pivot point
Mirror is fixed in place
within 1 arcmin
2nd point of contact
19
Programmable slits in Europe (2/3)
Multi-Object Spectroscopy: bench demonstration
 Large field illumination
 Long slit mode
(2 rows ON, the others OFF)
Tilt accuracy
< 1 arcmin
 Object selection
Two objects in the
FOV
Right object
selected
Left object selected
20
F. Zamkotsian, LAM
Programmable slits in Europe (3/3)
 Specific cryo test chamber developed,
compatible with the interferometric bench
 Vacuum 10-6 mbar,
Temperature, below 100K
92K - 0V
92K - 90V
Gold coated micromirrors
300 K: 35 nm
PtV
92 K: 50 nm 21
F. Zamkotsian, LAM
PtV
Programmable Mirror Arrays: future
• Application in E-ELT OPTIMOS & ESA
EUCLID dark energy mission
– If TRL can be enhanced
• Developments under way:
– Feasibility of large arrays: 20,000 mirrors;
early 2009
– Demonstration of addressing all mirrors in
large arrays: early 2009
– Operation of these arrays: late 2009
22
Beam positioning for Multi IFU
Spectroscopy: EAGLE
VLT  ELT
KMOS  EAGLE
Arms  ??
23
EAGLE Target Acquisition
System
output to 3D spectrometer
42 channels each with a deformable mirror &
24
6 plane mirrors
from
telescope
field image
at IFU slicer
cold stop at
pupil image
re-imaging
optics
beam-steering
mirror (BSM)
pupil image at
deformable
mirror
pick-off
mirror (POM)
pupil-imaging
mirror (PIM)
schematic of optics for alignment
Placement of POMs and Intermediate
Field Mirrors (IFMs)
Solutions
Options
Problems for EAGLE
issue
Pick-and-place or wireless robot
Robotic arm, Mitsubishi RH-12SH535, or
- Custom designed robotic arm
- Custom Star picker
- Snake arm, OC Robotics
- Wireless robots, UKATC in-house project
Not enough space due to back-focal distance
Mitsubishi RH-12SH535.
Gripper reach - 278 to 850mm
Repeatability - +/-25 m
Star picker
Gripper reach - 450Ømm
Repeatability - +/-2m
26
Placement of POMs and IFMs
Snake Arm Robotics
Gripper reach – design dependant
Repeatability - 5m difficult but
consultation required
Wireless robots
Range – TBC
Accuracy – 3 to 10m expected
Conclusions
– More investigation to find ‘of the shelf’ robot to include consultation with
manufacturers for specific gripper design requirements
- But space restrictions for EAGLE may restrict use of commercial robots
Further investigation into wireless solution as the technology develops – PhD project
started
27
Micro Autonomous Positioning
System
(MAPS)
Hermine Schnetler (UK ATC)
& William Taylor (Univ Edinburgh PhD
student)
Tank POM Models
29
Starbugs
Work well!
• All orientations
• Cryogenic
• Non-planar ‘focal
plane’
But EAGLE does not
have these
requirements, as
SmartMOMSI for OWL
did!
30
Why develop MAPS?
Is there another way?
• Yes - a pick and place module
– (STARPICKER)
But… MAPS would give us:
• Lower configuration times.
• Potentially very small POM-footprint.
• Associated sub systems would require less space.
At the moment the technical readiness of the whole system is
low but the readiness of the component systems is higher
31
Driving Mechanism
Requirements:
•
•
•
•
x-y drive
Accuracy: ±10 μm
Speed: 10mms-1
Ability to rotate about z axis
Possible drive mechanism:
• Micro brushless d.c. motors.
High speeds, but high power?
• Piezoelectric actuators used to form inch worm.
High precision and low power, but low speed?
We have completed a Master’s project thesis from Heriot Watt Robotics
department, analysing drive options & friction/torque trade-offs
May need to separate the problem: use x-y drive and then a
piezoelectric rotator stage for angular alignment.
32
Telemetry and control
• Are the robots and their mirrors where we want them to
be?
– Focal plane will be imaged.
• Form a closed-loop positioning system.
– Use LEDs to identify position and distinguish robots.
– Tests have shown satisfactory precision can easily be achieved.
• Interface with the robot via a Zigbee wireless link.
– Only send commands to robots.
33
Phase 1 in OPTICON
Build a proof of concept prototype utilising
existing technologies.
Building a simple chassis to hold motors
circuitry and a simple battery.
PIC microcontroller with pre-programmed
patterns.
Set up telemetry system using LEDs and camera
as before.
Show how accurate can the x-y drive be
with standard dc motors
Aim to complete this year with rapid
prototyping & subcontract electronics
34
PIC Controller &
motors
35
Active Beam Steering Mirror:
Astigmatism compensation
F. Madec, E. Hugot, E. Prieto, M. Ferrari, P. Vola, J.-L. Gimenez, J.-G. Cuby, LAM
36
Active BSM - Concept
Specific profiles


Astigmatism
compensation
Focus compensation
Diameter
200mm
Curvature radii
1800 ± 50mm
Surface quality
l/4 RMS
Surface quality
on 10mm zone
l/10 RMS
Material
Stainless steel
Central fixed
clamp
Four active
points
37
Active BSM
© CNRS Photothèque / PERRIN Emmanuel
Demonstration at SPIE 2008 - Marseille
38
Active BSM – WF analysis
• Astigmatism 200µm
PTV
• Focus 5µm PTV
• Residual aberrations
due to the partial
polishing
– Spherical aberration
– Astigmatism
• Final polishing in
progress
Astigmatism variation from 200µm PTV in one
direction to 200µm PTV in the other direction
39
OPTICON SFP achievements
• 2 ELT Instruments in E-ELT Phase A studies based on our
Smart Focal Plane Technologies
• MOSFIRE instrument for Keck using European Slit mechanism
from CSEM
• Potential application for MOEMS mirrors in ESA Euclid Dark
Energy Mission
• Working prototypes:
– Starpicker
– Starbugs
– Phase 1 MAPS Robot soon!
– Deformable Beam Steering Mirrors
– MOEMS mirrors
– Replicated image slicers
• Reports on enabling technologies: actuators, positions
sensing, slit mechanisms, internal metrology
40
Last Board Meeting: Planned
work to completion
WP 3.2 Cryomechanisms –Tip-Tilt Focal Plane ASTRON
WP 5.0 Management and Systems Engineering – UK ATC / IAC
WP 6.2 Pick-off Prototype – Gripper Cold Tests – CSEM/UK ATC
WP 6.2 Pick-off Prototype – Star-Picker Cold Tests –UK ATC
WP 6.3 Beam manipulator prototype - active optics – LAM
WP 6.4 MOEMS mirror array prototype – LAM/CSEM
WP6.5 Integration of Star-Picker and Cryo-Mirrors in Smart Focal Plane
Demonstrator
New: WP6.6 Evaluation of cooled and cryogenic mirrors for SFP based NIR &
MIR instruments with AO built-in - Coordinated by TNO-TPD, Delft,
Partners: Astron, Leiden, UK ATC (& Paisley Univ)
41
Achievements & changes in
last year
• WP 3.2 Cryomechanisms –Tip-Tilt Focal Plane ASTRON - Complete
• WP 5.0 Management and Systems Engineering – UK ATC / IAC Ongoing
• WP 6.2 Pick-off Prototype – Gripper Cold Tests – CSEM/UK ATC –
Gripper broken during tests: not worth repair due to EAGLE
requirements changing
• WP 6.2 Pick-off Prototype – Star-Picker Cold Tests –UK ATC – not
worth proceeding due to EAGLE requirements changing
• WP 6.3 Beam manipulator prototype - active optics – LAM Complete
• WP 6.4 MOEMS mirror array prototype – LAM/CSEM - Complete
• WP6.5 Integration of Star-Picker and Cryo-Mirrors in Smart Focal
Plane Demonstrator -not worth proceeding due to EAGLE
requirements changing
• New WP: Evaluation of cooled and cryogenic mirrors for SFP based
NIR & MIR instruments with AO built-in – TNO + others – delayed,
but report expected by end of 2008
• New WP: Micro robotic pick-off mirrors: UK ATC – Good progress
42
Overall Objectives Met?
• Evaluate, develop and prototype of
technologies for Smart Focal Planes - YES
• Build up and strengthen a network of
expertise in Europe, and encourage mobility
between partners – YES
• Engage European Industry in the
development of technologies which can be
batch produced to enable future complex
instruments to be built economically –
Partial – image slicers
• Enable these technologies to be developed
to the stage where they can be considered
for the next generation of telescopes - YES
43
Cost Summary
• Spend to end 2008 (EU only)
– Budget: €1,968,000
– Total Spend: €1,867,137
– Very little left for final year: €100,863
• Budget for 2009
– UK ATC Micro robots and Commercial Robots
study
• €70k
– ASTRON Piezo Focal Plane Mechanism
Completion
• €30k
• We expect to spend these amounts
44
Smart Instrument Technologies
Proposal for FP7: Summary
• Smart Focal Plane Technology developments are
now being carried forward into ELT instrument
Phase A programme for EAGLE and possibly
OPTIMOS
• Proposal for FP7 addresses 2 further questions:
– How to build lower mass, active instruments to meet
flexure requirements of wide-field or high resolution
cryogenic instruments?
• Note that mass/volume constraints for EAGLE & HARMONI
result in density <20% of water, compared with > 30% for
current instruments
– Are there science and operational gains from expanding
the Smart Focal Plane concept into a Smart Instrument
Suite where several different instruments a fed from a wide
field pick off system, and if so what technologies need
development?
45
Objectives in FP7
• Provide instrument builders with a suite of building
blocks that will enable a paradigm shift in the way
the ground-based astronomical community builds
optical and infrared instruments.
• Smart technologies and devices will be developed
so that European astronomical instrument builders
can meet the demands made by the science
community for
–
–
–
–
wider fields-of-view,
higher spectral and spatial resolutions,
wider bandwidths and
simultaneous spectroscopy of multiple objects
• while fitting within demanding size-footprints,
mass budgets and engineering tolerances.
46
E-ELT Instrument
Platform
• 9 focal stations
– 2 gravity
invariant
– 1 Coudé
• How will we deal
with the other 6?
• And outside
Europe: all the
GMT focal
stations?
47
Example of closed loop
compensation: X-shooter for
VLT
• Requirements:
– Stability of 0.08
asec (goal 0.04)
• Challenge
– 3 arm UVB/Vis/NIR
(300-2400 nm)
spectrograph at
Cass
48
Solution: Active Flexure
Compensation
Rasmussen et al, SPIE 2008
• 2 tip-tilt piezo mirrors align 3
slits using pinhole illuminators
• Correct after slew or every hour
49
Reducing size and mass
will help reduce flexure
• How?
– Lightweight and stiff
structural materials
– Ultra lightweight metal
optics
• ASTRON example
– Integrated Optics devices
• Astrophotonics
– More compact optical
designs
50
Reduce flexure with more
compact instruments
New instrument optics?
• Flexure
• Extreme aspheres can
produce more compact
instruments
• Less flexure as linear
dimensions are less goes as L2
51
Smart Technologies
Toolkit
• Active Focal Planes – motor
or piezo drives
• Active Structures
• Active mirrors
• Built-in metrology
• Highly Aspheric Mirrors
• New materials and
corresponding
characterisation data
• Integrated Modelling Tools
• Micro spectrometers – see
Jeremy Allington-Smith
Astrophotonics
52
Plan
• Develop a novel instrument architecture
– drive the requirements of these Smart Instrument building blocks
and then use this to model operational and observing efficiency
in the context of a practical instrument
• Develop Smart Instrument Technologies
– active mirrors,
– micro-actuation
– metrology devices.
• In addition, the drive for wider fields-of-view pushes us
towards large and heavy instruments, exacerbating the
flexure problems, so we will develop
– smart structures and
– highly aspheric mirrors to enable more compact and lighter
instruments.
53
Work package 5.1: Technical
Management and System Analysis
• A Smart Instrument architecture concept
will be developed based on an existing
telescope such as the VLT instrument suite
– Concept drawn up through a joint team
workshop, then developed by the lead team at
the UK ATC
• The instrument concept will be evaluated
against existing instruments to assess the
improvements in terms of performance,
mass, volume and cost
• This concept will then be used to determine
the requirements for the technology to be
developed
54
Work package 5.2: Optical Components
with Extreme Aspheric Surfaces
• LAM will develop the concept of a highly compact optical
design that makes use of extreme aspheric surface optical
components
– Develop a plug-in design tool that can be used in conjunction
with existing optical analysis software such as Zemax to design,
optimise and analyse the performance of extreme aspheric
surface optical components.
– Develop and evaluate the manufacturing processes (including
stress polishing) required to manufacture these extreme aspheric
optical surfaces
– Design and manufacture an optical component demonstrator
with extreme aspheric surfaces (in the context of an astronomical
instrument for wide field spectroscopy)
– Devise methods to differentiate between low and mid/high order
deformations, e.g. combining passive low/mid order
deformations and high order active deformations
– Laboratory characterisation of the extreme surface optical
component.
– Define the optical requirements of the demonstrator’s55extreme
surface optical components
Work package 5.3: Smart Micro
Actuation Devices and Cryogenic
Structures
• Investigate the combination of piezo actuators, miniature motors
and miniature optical devices to produce a number of SIT building
blocks that can be used in, for example: a moderate speed, low
density wavefront compensator to correct for instrument
deformation, and thus actively control the stiffness of a structure
over a large dynamic range.
• These devices can also be used to position optical components
accurately to replace heavy and large structures with dynamic
equivalents.
• Evaluation and test of actuation, encoding, measurement and control
devices at cryogenic temperatures, down to 20K
• Evaluate optical and dimensional metrology systems used in the
growing application of Smart Structures in the aerospace, defence
and civil engineering industries
– optical sensors (including CCD/CMOS cameras and interferometers)
– strain gauges (including fibre devices)
– inclinometers.
• Investigate the application of cryogenically cooled extension sensing
actuators to maintain open loop nanometre position accuracy for
instrumentation applications
• Investigation of bonding of piezo-devices to Zerodur and 56
silicon
carbide using silicate bonding.
Cost
SUMMARY
Total E ffort Cost
E quipment Cost
Travel Cost
Total
UK ATC
LAM
NOVA
CS E M
12.0
18.0
12.0
5.5
128.5
60.0
10.0
€ 198.48
128.4
30.0
10.0
€ 168.39
97.6
60.0
10.0
€ 167.59
90.8
30.0
10.0
€ 130.84
€ 665.30
€ 500.00
Total
TOTAL EU
57
Key Outcomes
Smart Instrument Architecture
(T0+6)
Smart Technology Device Specifications
(T0+12)
Zemax plug-in software module for extreme
aspheric surfaces
(T0+12)
Extreme aspheric mirror demonstrator analysis
and design report, including a description of the
manufacturing processes
(T0+24)
Prototype active focal plane system building block
(T0+24)
Extreme aspheric mirror prototype demonstrator
(T0+36)
Piezo array bonded to optical structures
(T0+36)
Cryogenic smart structures design and
manufacturing report
(T0+40)
58
How Smart Instrument
Technologies will make an
impact
• Will provide engineering solutions to
the problems of mass, size and
stability to which Jeremy AllingtonSmith alluded by:
– New design tools for compact aspherics
– New devices for active control of surfaces
and optical components within
instruments
– Providing medium-term solutions to these
problems, which may ultimately be solved
59
by photonic instruments
Additional Slides
Dissemination of results:
publications
Proc. SPIE 5382 (2004)
Smart focal plane technologies for ELT instruments
Colin R. Cunningham, Suzanne K. Ramsay-Howat, Francisco Garzon, Ian R. Parry, Eric Prieto, David J. Robertson,
and Frederic Zamkotsian
Proc. SPIE 5904 (2005)
Progress on smart focal plane technologies for extremely large telescopes
Colin Cunningham, Eli Atad, Jeremy Bailey, Fabio Bortoletto, Francisco Garzon, Peter Hastings, Roger Haynes,
Callum Norrie, Ian Parry, Eric Prieto, Suzanne R.Howat, Juergen Schmoll, Lorenzo Zago, and Frederic
Zamkotsian
Proc. SPIE 6273 (2006)
A scalable pick-off technology for multi-object instruments
Peter Hastings; Suzanne Ramsay Howat; Peter Spanoudakis; Raymond van den Brink; Callum Norrie; David
Clarke; K. Laidlaw; S. McLay; Johan Pragt; Hermine Schnetler; L. Zago
SMART-MOS: a NIR imager-MOS for the ELT
Francisco Garzón; Eli Atad-Ettedgui; Peter Hammersley; David Henry; Callum Norrie; Pablo Redondo; Frederic
Zamkotsian
New beam steering mirror concept and metrology system for multi-IFU
Fabrice Madec; Eric Prieto; Pierre-Eric Blanc; Emmanuel Hugot; Sébastien Vivès; Marc Ferrari; Jean-Gabriel Cuby
Deployable payloads with Starbug
Andrew McGrath; Roger Haynes
It's alive! Performance and control of prototype Starbug actuators
Roger Haynes; Andrew McGrath; Jurek Brzeski; David Correll; Gabriella Frost; Peter Gillingham; Stan Miziarski;
Rolf Muller; Scott Smedley
Micro-mirror array for multi-object spectroscopy
Frederic Zamkotsian; Severin Waldis; Wilfried Noell; Kacem ElHadi; Patrick Lanzoni; Nico de Rooij
Proc. SPIE 6466 (2007)
Uniform tilt-angle micromirror array for multi-object spectroscopy
Severin Waldis; Pierre-Andre Clerc; Frederic Zamkotsian; Michael Zickar; Wilfried Noell; Nico de Rooij
Proc SPIE 2008
EAGLE: an MOAO fed multi-IFU in the NIR on the E-ELT
Jean-Gabriel Cuby, Simon Morris et al
61
CIMTECH 2008
•
Configurable slit-mask unit of the multi-object spectrometer for infra-red
exploration for the Keck telescope: integration and tests
Peter Spanoudakis, Laurent Giriens, Simon Henein, Leszek Lisowski, Aidan O'Hare,
Emmanuel Onillon, Philippe Schwab, and Patrick Theurillat
•
Smart instrument technologies to meet extreme instrument stability requirements
Colin Cunningham, Peter Hastings, Florian Kerber, David Montgomery, Lars Venema, and
Pascal Vola
Micromirror array for multiobject spectroscopy in ground-based and space
telescopes
Severin Waldis, Frederic Zamkotsian, Patrick Lanzoni, Wilfried Noell, and Nico de Rooij
•
•
Piezo-driven adjustment of a cryogenic detector
Johan H. Pragt, Raymond van den Brink, Gabby Kroes, Niels Tromp, and Jean-Baptiste
Ochs
•
CIMTEC 2008 (invited)
•
•
Paper 7018-94, F. Madec & al, SPIE 2008
Paper 7018-173 Hugot & al, SPIE2008
62
Light & stiff Structural
Materials
•
Optical bench or box and reflective
optics can be made from one
material
–
–
–
–
•
Aluminium
SiC
CSiC
New alloys – aluminium/beryllium ?
But they need low-thermal
conductivity structural supports at
cryogenic temperatures
–
Composites
• CFRP
• G10 glass fibre
–
Plastics
• Vespel
• Tensioned Kevlar
•
•
Results in differential contraction
issues
Yesterday we saw an idea from Oliver
Saw at JPL for a zero CTE truss using
an actuator and range gating (sub
nanometre) sensor combination
UK ATC: SCUBA-2
63
Image Slicers
• Invented by Ira Bowen in
1938, but only now
coming into use as
optical fabrication
techniques make it
possible
• Now possible to
replicate using
electroforming
• For visible light: Sub
10nm rms surfaces
needed – still only
possible with glass
slicers
• Economic study shows
cross-over at about 30
daughter
mother
mandrel
64
W P5
1
2
3
S mart Instrument
UKATC
LAM
NOVA
Technologies
W ork P ackage Number
WP 5.1
W ork P ackage Title
Technical Management and S ystem Analysis
Activity Type
J oint Research Activity (RTD)
P articipate Number
1
2
3
P erson-months per participant
2
2
2
4
CS E M
Total E ffort Cost
E quipment Cost
Travel Cost
Total
GRAND Total
€ 16.36
€ 0.00
€ 5.00
€ 21.36
€ 16.86
€ 0.00
€ 5.00
€ 21.86
€ 88.78
3
0
4
0
€ 0.00
€ 0.00
€ 0.00
€ 0.00
€ 0.00
€ 0.00
€ 0.00
€ 0.00
€ 134.98
€ 21.54
€ 0.00
€ 5.00
€ 26.54
€ 14.02
€ 0.00
€ 5.00
€ 19.02
W ork P ackage Number
WP 5.2
W ork P ackage Title
E xtreme Aspheric S urfaces
Activity Type
J oint Research Activity
P articipate Number
1
2
P erson-months per participant
0
14
Total E ffort Cost
E quipment Cost
Travel Cost
Total
GRAND Total
€ 0.00
€ 0.00
€ 0.00
€ 0.00
€ 99.98
€ 30.00
€ 5.00
€ 134.98
W ork P ackage Number
WP 5.3
W ork P ackage Title
S mart Micro-Actuation Devices and Cryogenic S tructures
Activity Type
J oint Research Activity
P articipate Number
1
2
3
P erson-months per participant
10
2
10
Total E ffort Cost
E quipment Cost
Travel Cost
Total
GRAND Total
4
1
4
4.5
€ 106.94
€ 60.00
€ 5.00
€ 171.94
€ 14.39
€ 0.00
€ 0.00
€ 14.39
€ 81.23
€ 60.00
€ 5.00
€ 146.23
€ 73.98
€ 30.00
€ 5.00
€ 108.98
€ 441.54
UK ATC
LAM
NOVA
CS E M
12.0
18.0
12.0
5.5
128.5
60.0
10.0
€ 198.48
128.4
30.0
10.0
€ 168.39
97.6
60.0
10.0
€ 167.59
90.8
30.0
10.0
€ 130.84
€ 665.30
€ 500.00
SUMMARY
Total E ffort Cost
E quipment Cost
Travel Cost
Total
Total
TOTAL EU
65
MILESTONES
Detailed Project Plan
(T0+2)
Smart Instrument Architecture
(T0+6)
Smart Technology Device
Specifications
(T0+12)
Zemax plug-in software module for
extreme aspheric surfaces analysis and design report
(T0+12)
Zemax plug-in software module for
extreme aspheric surfaces
(T0+12)
Extreme aspheric mirror
demonstrator analysis and design
report, including a description of the
manufacturing processes
(T0+24)
Extreme aspheric mirror prototype
demonstrator
(T0+36)
Extreme aspheric mirror
demonstrator Test Report
(T0+40)
Piezo and Metrology evaluation
report
(T0+18)
Prototype active focal plane system
building block
(T0+24)
Piezo array bonded to optical
structures
(T0+36)
Rotation unit with extreme dynamic
range
(T0+36)
Cryogenic smart structures design
and manufacturing report
(T0+40)
66