Setting a New Course for Electricity in Ontario

Download Report

Transcript Setting a New Course for Electricity in Ontario

Issues Affecting the Electricity
T&D System in North America
Global Utility Summit
Los Angeles, Nov 17, 2008
Presented by
WK (Bill) Marshall
Senior Associate
Personal Background
Retired President, now
Independent Consultant
SPC
2
Why Visit Southern California?
3
System Development Challenge
Balancing the policy drivers
Reliable Supply
Consumers
Acceptable
Prices
Environmental
Sustainability
4
Complicating Factors
• Generation issues
- Fuel costs and availability
- Climate change (and other emission issues)
- Renewable requirements
• Distribution issues
- Demand response
- Distributed generation
- “Smart” components
• Transmission ownership, access and benefits
5
Fossil Fuel Prices in $/MBtu
(Conventional Unit Electricity Cost in Cents/kWh)
20.00
18.00
16.00
14.00
12.00
Coal
10.00
HF Oil
8.00
Nat Gas
6.00
4.00
2.00
0.00
2002
|
2003
|
2004
|
2005
|
2006
|
2007 |
2008
Source – US DOE
NY Harbour HFO, NYMEX Appalachian coal, NYMEX Henry Hub natural gas
6
Forecast
Demand
From David Hughes - NRCan
7
From David Hughes - NRCan
8
NE - Reliance on Natural Gas
Summer 2000
Pumped
Storage
1,679 MW
7.0%
Hydro
1,626 MW
6.8%
Other
Renewables
1,092 MW
4.6%
Summer 2006
Natural Gas
4,255 MW
17.7%
Pumped
Storage
1,672 MW
5.4%
Hydro
1,691 MW
5.5%
Othe r
Renewables
922 MW
3.0%
Natural Gas
11,803 MW
38.1%
Coal
2,846 MW
9.2%
Coal
2,814 MW
11.7%
Nuclear
4,448 MW
14.4%
Nuclear
4,359 MW
18.2%
Total: 23,975 MW
Oil
8,150 MW
34.0%
Oil
7,549 MW
24.4%
Total: 30,931 MW
Note: Units in the “Other Renewables” category include those fueled by biomass, refuse, and wind.
Original Slide
from ISO-NE
10
Climate Change
• Growing international issue
• Increasing state and provincial issue
• Regional climate change initiatives
- Northeast and west
• Targeted reductions
-
Kyoto – 6% from 1990 by 2012
Canada – 20% from 2006 by 2020
G8 – 50% from 2006 by 2050 (Electricity??)
USA - ?????
11
12
Renewable Development
• Major wind increases
- Texas, California, Mid West, Alberta, Maritimes
• Many aggressive state RPS requirements
- Partly climate change strategy
- Partly hedge on fossil fuels
• Possible national RPS of 20%
• Integration issues need resolution
- Transmission access and delivery
- Distributed distribution connections
- Balancing
13
NE States Seek Renewable Energy:
Requirements to Increase 500%: 2006 - 2015
RPS Requirement as a % of
Energy in New England (2015)
•
– 3,750 MW of wind, or
– 1,600 MW of biomass
6.5%
•
93.5%
6.5% RPS requirement in
2015 equivalent to:
Proposed renewable projects
in New England total 1,900
MW
– Not all renewables qualify for
RPS
NE RPS Requirement
NE Energy From Other Sources
Original Slide
from
ISO-NE
www.nbso.ca
14
14
15
Relative Transmission Costs
• Transmission benefits are large yet costs
are relatively small
Transmission
Distribution
Total Electricity Cost
Transmission 6-10%
Distribution 15-30%
Generation 60-75%
Generation
16
Transmission Benefits
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Increased Reliability
Lower system losses
Lower rates for end use customers
Reduced congestion
Improved competition
Greater supply diversity
Lower emissions
Environment siting of generation
National security
17
Transmission Development
• Investment has lagged load growth
• Significant congestion has resulted
• Regulatory changes have not helped
- OATT physical rights
- Locational pricing and financial rights
- Minimum interconnection standards
• Reliability margins have shrunk
• 2003 blackout focused attention
18
Transmission Questions
• Why no investment?
• Why continued congestion?
• Some reasons
-
Cost differential across the congested interfaces
Winners and losers
Disproportionate value
Intra-state concerns
State versus regional interests
19
New Transmission Paradigm
• Energy Policy Act 2005
- Add Section 219 to Federal Power Act
- Provide incentives for transmission development
• DOE identification of “National Interest Electricity
Transmission Corridors” (NIETC)
• FERC incentive rule issued July 20, 2006
-
Higher ROE
100% CWIP
Recover prudent pre-commercial costs
Approval by state or designation by DOE as NIETC not
required but worthwhile
20
DOE NIETC East
Congestion in
the Eastern
Interconnection
21
Transmission Projects
SPC
NIETC
Hydro
Renewable
Market
22
Mandatory Reliability Standards
• FERC empowered through Energy Policy Act
- Approve standards
- Issue sanctions up to $1,000,000 per day
• Actions are a response to 9/11, 2003 Blackout and
security concerns
• NERC designated “Electric Reliability Organization”
• Consequences?
- Increased reliability
- Increased equipment, labour and related costs
23
“Smart” Grid
• Transmission actions
- Reduce reliance on SPSs
- Increase demand response for market and control
- Improve SCADA systems
• Distribution actions
-
Real time monitoring
Two way smart metering and load control
Feeder balancing
Enhanced restoration and service
24
Moving to the T&D Future
25
HR - The Final Challenge
• Work force is old and retiring (CEA Study)
- 50% of transmission workers will retire in 10 years
- Only 7% of trades below age 30
• Looming shortfall at a time of significant growth
with new technologies
• Challenge is huge
-
Transfer existing experience and knowledge
Train new workers with new and old skills
Work smarter
Do more with less
26
Time For Action!
“When you get to the fork
in the road, take it!”
Yogi Berra
27