Climate change, land use planning and the EU Floods Directive

Download Report

Transcript Climate change, land use planning and the EU Floods Directive

Climate change, land use
planning and the EU Floods
Directive: Lessons from the
Schelde
Katrien Debeuckelaere
Legal Advisor, Land Use Planning, Flemish Region
Gretta Goldenman
Director, Milieu Ltd, Environmental Law & Policy, Brussels
Outline of presentation
• Impacts
of climate change on flood risk in
Europe
• Climate change & the EU Floods Directive
• Land use planning as an instrument for
bringing together flood risk management &
nature protection
• Case study of the Schelde River
• Lessons learned
Europe is concerned about floods
• Over
100 major damaging floods in Europe
between 1998 & 2004
- Danube (2002)
- Elbe (2002)
• Impacts
include
- 700 deaths + half a million people displaced
- Over €25 billion in insured economic losses
• Trend
continues
- Czech Republic & Romania (2010)
Climate change impacts predicted
for Europe
• More
rain in northwestern Europe, less rain
in southern Europe
- Over most mid- & high latitudes of Northern Hemisphere
flood magnitude & frequency likely (66-90% probability) to
increase in most regions, & low flows likely to decrease in
most regions (IPCC, 2001)
• More
extreme precipitation events
• Not yet possible to analyse climate change
impacts on water resources at catchment
scale (limited resolution of current CC simulations - grids
200 km2)
Climate change & flood risk
•
Map showing the number of times more likely it is that a European winter will be
extremely wet in 50 to 100 years, compared with today.
Source: Palmer and Räisänen (2002).
EU Floods Directive
Directive 2007/60/EC on the assessment and
management of flood risks
• applies to all inland waters & coastal waters across
the EU territory
• Member States required to
- carry out preliminary flood risk assessments by 2011
- prepare flood risk maps by 2013
- develop flood risk management plans focused on
prevention, protection & preparedness by 2015
- facilitate public participation in this process
EU Floods Directive (2)
• Closely
linked to Water Framework Directive
- Requires coordination with e.g. river basin
management planning & public participation
procedures in their preparation
• Coordination
required for shared river
basins, including with third counties
- MS must not undertake measures that would
increase flood risk in neighbouring countries
EU Floods Directive (3)
• Aim:
to reduce & manage the risks that
floods pose to human health, environment,
cultural heritage & economic activity
• Recognises:
- climate change as long-term risk factor
- importance of sustainable land use in planning for
flood risk prevention & management
Land use planning
• Land
use planning as an instrument for
bringing together flood risk management &
nature protection
• The Schelde
Key dates for the Schelde
•
•
•
•
1953 flood
1976 flood – impetus for Sigma
1977 – Sigma Plan (focus on dikes)
2005 – Sigma Plan revised
Wintam
Sigma Plan revised
change – rise of sea level – 1/70
years a flood – 1/lifetime – safety
• Opportunity to combine flood
prevention/safety – shipping - nature
protection - recreation
• SEA and CBA for SIGMA Plan
• Climate
Land use planning
Framework
• Spatial structure plan for Flanders is a
Policy plan
• Implementation by Land-use plans - Spatial
Implementation Plan – defines zoning
Spatial Structure Plan →
Spatial Implementation Plan
• Designation
of and development
prospects for the natural structure
• Important role of the Schelde river as
an important part of the natural
structure
• Sigma Plan + Spatial Structure Plan
• Spatial Implementation Plan
Kruibeke-Bazel-Rupelmonde
•
•
•
Part of original Sigma Plan
600 hectares
Spatial implementation plan needed for a flood
control area – wetlands – reduced tidal area - dike
- Protection against floods
- Development of nature: mudflats and salt marshes;
- Recreation;
- Agriculture.
Prosperpolder
•
•
•
Sigma Plan revised
Longterm vision Schelde estuary (co-operation
Flanders – Netherlands-) Hedwige polder – total
465 hectares
Spatial implementation plan needed for an intertidal
area – 170 hectares
- Protection against floods
- Protection and development of nature: mudflats and salt
marshes;
- Recreation;
- Agriculture.
Instruments
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Policy plan: Spatial structure plan
Sigma plan
Land use plan
Expropriation
Social plan
Landbank
Natureplan –SEA
CBA
…
At project level: permits
Who is involved
• Several
administrations at regional level
• Flanders and the Netherlands: co-operation
• Several communes
• Civil society eg nature protection, farmers,..
• Individual stakeholders
Lessons – Climate change
→ adaptable: Sigma plan → revision
• New research results → implementation
• Participation
• Co-operation between administrations and
cross-border
• Land use plan is one of several instruments
• Planningsystems in EU differ
• Plans
Lessons – EU Floods Directive
•
Planning needs to be at regional as well as at
national & local levels
• The process takes time
• Stakeholder participation helps, but there will be
conflicts
• Schelde case shows how flood risk assessment
helps make the case for spending public funds on
prevention & mitigation
• Potential win-win situation for nature protection
• In the end, political will essential
Thank you
www.rwo.be
www.milieu.be